Posted on 04/24/2024 8:39:54 AM PDT by bitt
All of that.....and more.
but that is a misdemeanor and the statute of limitations had expired. They had to manufacture another crime that this was supposedly to conceal in order to have a viable felony.
Reminder to the writer: Kangaroo courts don’t often find people “not guilty”.
These “takes” on how Bragg made some error are a joke... they make it sound like this were a serious case that could be muffed through bad prosecution. The case is a joke and it just shows what can happen if you have a judge who just doesn’t care. They want Trump to become “convicted felon” Donald Trump, that is all... because that title will remain until after the election given how long the appellate process takes. Only the jury stands in the way of a conviction now.
Yeah but will Trump’s lawyers file a motion to dismiss..this would seal the deal and get it dismissed under NORMAL circumstances because this “case” should never have been filed to begin with
Trump will either be acquitted or get a hung jury, at most guilty of a misdemeanor. But regardless he will appeal and win on appeal easily based on dozens are reasons.
-PJ
The author seems to think that facts and law have some relevance. They don’t. This is a show trial designed to force Trump to sit in a NY courtoom for weeks while democrats throw crap allegations against him hoping that something sticks.
If the all-democrat jury finds Trump guilty (which most or all of them already decided to do before they were evenpicked for the jury) and the democrat hack judge throws Trump in jail (which democrats everywhere are begging him to do), it will be a bonus.
“Bragg and Colangelo . . . maintain that Trump, Cohen, and Pecker conspired to get Trump elected to President of the United States.”
That is actually the crime being prosecuted, regardless of the tenor of the formal charges.
Were Trump not a threat to become president again, there would be no criminal cases and no civil cases. Pure and unadulterated election interference.
Exactly
But is it a federal election? Looks to me like it's a state election, to determine which slate of Electors the State of New York will send to the Electoral College. Those people vote in a federal election.
“Bragg and Colangelo . . . maintain that Trump, Cohen, and Pecker conspired to get Trump elected to President of the United States.”
Does this premise mean, that all the mainstream media should be targeted for “Not” reporting or burying stories on all other political candidates? Sheesh!
AMEN! & AMEN!
You anticipated my point. It could pass court muster I suppose, plus, in New York, Donald Trump could be convicted of being a Martian invader.🤷♂️ There appears to be no Constitutional law in New York State ➡ governed by the 40 thieves❗
Decent people must leave New York > likewise Fornicalia 😠
If Bragg is using a state crime as his justification for bootstrapping his expired misdemeanors into felonies, I'd think that Trump has to be found guilty of those crimes first. Bragg can't just assert that Trump committed those crimes to revive his misdemeanors because Trump has the presumption of innocence until found guilty in a court of law. And Bragg doesn't have the jurisdiction to indict on those state charges.
-PJ
I’d rather be governed by Ali Baba’s 40 thieves, than by New York.
Just yesterday, we had some “judge” in Noo Yawk XXXXty declaring the Second Amendment nonexistent.
New York Judges are not suddenly going to quit being Corrupt.
= = =
So, when citing a judge, is it like a congressman?
Mr.Smith (D-MA) or Mr.Jones (R-CO)?
We have to add
Judge Wilson (C-NY). Corrupt
Just yesterday, we had some “judge” in Noo Yawk XXXXty declaring the Second Amendment nonexistent.
= = =
So do the remainder move up one notch?
I plead the 4th?
I expect that the Constitution as a whole does not exist in her “court”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.