Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas governor defies Supreme Court ruling, continues to fortify border with razor wire
KFOX14.Com ^ | Wed, January 24th 2024 | Jacquelyn Quiñones

Posted on 01/24/2024 9:36:11 AM PST by BradtotheBone

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: BradtotheBone

Is he?

I thought the court said fedgov could damage it.

Did they say Texas could not put it there?


41 posted on 01/24/2024 10:22:23 AM PST by cableguymn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Better late than never. Looks like Abbott finally grew a pair


42 posted on 01/24/2024 10:29:08 AM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone
Bravo Texas ! !
43 posted on 01/24/2024 10:29:31 AM PST by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

The Supreme court said Biden could cut holes in it. They didn’t say Texas couldn’t put it up, or patch the holes..


44 posted on 01/24/2024 10:29:59 AM PST by norwaypinesavage (The power of the press is not in what it includes, rather, it's in that which is omitted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44

LOL 😂 !!!!


45 posted on 01/24/2024 10:30:18 AM PST by 11th_VA (Celebrate Climate Change !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Governor Abbott took an oath to protect the state of Texas.


46 posted on 01/24/2024 10:31:43 AM PST by yldstrk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15
"The possibility of real conflict comes if Texas tries to stop CBP from removing the wire or arrests CPB agents, which Abbott appears to be avoiding."

The truth is the CBP agents have an understanding behind the scenes with the deployed Texas DPS troopers and National Guard soldiers to secure the border regardless of the treasonous communist junta that is the Biden administration. All are Texas patriots who stand firmly for the safety and security of Texas residents. They know the community supports them solidly in their efforts to "Hold the Line!"

47 posted on 01/24/2024 10:32:03 AM PST by Unmarked Package
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
I thought the reaction from the right regarding Barrett was overwrought: she merely opined that the law was not clear enough to show that Texas would win and, therefore, the injunction did not meet one of the two legal tests it required.

The bigger problem with Barrett (Roberts is an administrative state traitor, which we already knew) is that it shows how conservative scruples in following the law allow the left and it's factotum, the Biden regime, to win.

If you're fighting a war and want to win, you first have to recognize that. Pretending the Constitution still functions won't make it so.

48 posted on 01/24/2024 10:33:30 AM PST by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Deserves repeating!

“Go Abbott!!!”


49 posted on 01/24/2024 10:40:41 AM PST by Taxman ((SAVE AMERICA! VOTE REPUBLICAN IN 2024! SAVE AMERICA!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
"Veronica Escobar"

Any relation to Pablo?
Could she want the border open to help move the family product?

50 posted on 01/24/2024 10:44:52 AM PST by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Abbot for PRESIDENT!!!


51 posted on 01/24/2024 10:46:08 AM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Manic_Episode

Ya beat me to it. I guess I need to learn to read all comments before posting.


52 posted on 01/24/2024 10:47:09 AM PST by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Yes! Yes! Yes!


53 posted on 01/24/2024 10:48:25 AM PST by af_vet_1981 ( The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

And before that, the Sanctuary cities ignored the constitution.


54 posted on 01/24/2024 10:51:50 AM PST by Sertorius (A hayseed with no Greek and dam^ proud of it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Lawlessness breeds lawlessness. Suck it up Supreme Court.


55 posted on 01/24/2024 10:54:46 AM PST by Chgogal (Welcome to Fuhrer Biden's Weaponized Fascist Banana Republic! It's the road to hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

“she merely opined that the law was not clear enough to show that Texas would win”

That seems like a weird criteria to judge by. So the judge has to first opine if it’s a clear law. That seems like judging the case before you judge the case.


56 posted on 01/24/2024 10:54:55 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom (“Occupy your mind with good thoughts or your enemy will fill them with bad ones.” ~ Thomas More)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

He is not defying the court, they just said the CBP can cut the wire, it did not say that Texas could place it and did not order them to remove it. So it could be Texas puts up one day, CBP removes the next day and so on and so forth.


57 posted on 01/24/2024 10:56:48 AM PST by gunnut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

Yup. I side with Texas. Especially when Biden and the Democrats always ignore the law when it suits them.


58 posted on 01/24/2024 10:59:52 AM PST by Chgogal (Welcome to Fuhrer Biden's Weaponized Fascist Banana Republic! It's the road to hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Manic_Episode

My exact thoughts when I saw that name. You don’t honestly think ol’ Pablo’s billions just up and vanished like a fart in the wind, do you?


59 posted on 01/24/2024 11:00:42 AM PST by Spacetrucker (George Washington didn't use his freedom of speech to defeat the British - HE SHOT THEM .. WITH GUNS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
The requirements for an injunction are: a) irreparable harm; and b) the plaintiff is clearly likely to prevail.

If the law is unclear, (b) is unclear.

60 posted on 01/24/2024 11:01:16 AM PST by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson