Posted on 11/08/2020 6:36:10 PM PST by dangus
In their ‘pseudoverse’, there is no probable cause for making such allegations. In the real world, there is an abundance of it, and together with additional actionable intelligence, I don’t see how we don’t have a case.
Initiate, strike and follow through. Wash, rinse and repeat. Drain the swamp and the pseudoverse implodes at a safe distance. Proceed with caution and keep the faith.
>> Registrations may not have been up to date. <<
That would mean there is an even larger excess of registrations.
“Then Dearborn ...”
Then the City of Dearbornistan, formerly known as Dearborn.
Which requires a complete revote-—IN PERSON. WITH PURPLE FINGERS !!!
The most obvious fraud is to check for numbers of ballots in a ward vs the numbers of those who were noted as having officially voted on election day, either in person or by absentee. Each ward caries a sign in book that show who has voted and who hasn’t among those who are actually registered.
Some have said just checking watermarks is not good eevidnece. I disagree. Each state of local precinct would have ballots printed specifically by the one company they contracted with. Differing watermarks in a ward or precinct would because for suspicion even if other wards used another company or printer than what the others use. It would be like a fingerprint unique to a ward, country or precinct.
There is a Wayne in PA but it doesn’t have the poplulation
they are discussing. It is a class six county.
Population of 45,000 to 89,999
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.