The Day My Son Called Me A ‘Faggot’

So I guess the all bold thing means that YOU REALLY MEAN IT.

Whoever that is that you cut and pasted says a whole lot of nothing about nothing.

He says,

In this part we have criticized the common assumption that sexual desires, attractions, or longings reveal some innate and fixed feature of our biological or psychological constitution, a fixed sexual identity or orientation.

But I don't see the criticism. You should cut and paste that. All the rest is jibber jabber and doesn't address the issue.

He won't be able to, of course, and his attempt will be weak and devoid of facts. It will be his opinion, just like your strident chatterings.

He seems to think that mine is a commonly held opinion, though, which is nice. I came up with my theory all on my own. And I have no problem using my own words to explain it.

You should try it.

Also, your meme sucks. Too wordy. In the world of memes, less is more. Just a word of advice from the master.

Dig the screen name, though. Too bad its wasted on such a dullard.

And just to show what a nothing article this is that you cited, the author says this;

While some claim that sexual orientation is a choice, others say that sexual orientation is a fixed feature of one’s nature, that one is “born that way.” We hope to show here that, though sexual orientation is not a choice, neither is there scientific evidence for the view that sexual orientation is a fixed and innate biological property.

So, according to him, faggotry is neither innate (born this way) OR a choice. While both types of faggotry are present in homo world, there are no other options to choose from. Its either innate (born this way), or a choice. This fraud chooses neither. How is that possible?

His having said this, the rest of his article can be safely dismissed.

At one point in human history, there was no 'scientific evidence' that the world was round. Ponder that one.

Ignorance is not proof. Write that down and put it on your fridge.

After he stated this;

Epidemiological studies show a rather modest association between genetic factors and sexual attractions or behaviors, but do not provide significant evidence pointing to particular genes. There is also evidence for other hypothesized biological causes of homosexual behaviors, attractions, or identity — such as the influence of hormones on prenatal development — but that evidence, too, is limited.

After here admitting that there is a 'modest association' and there IS evidence for the 'born that way' theory, however 'scant', 'insufficient', and 'limited', he concludes; We hope to show here that, though sexual orientation is not a choice, neither is there scientific evidence for the view that sexual orientation is a fixed and innate biological property.

He goes from a 'modest association' and 'scant', 'insufficient', and 'limited' evidence (without letting his readers examine the evidence) to saying that there is no evidence at all.

From his own words, we can conclude that there IS an association and evidence to support my claim.

And with that, your article is doomed. Thank you for proving my case. I will not be paying you.

Next time you use another's words to support your weak argument, examine those words more carefully.

Think of this as a learning experience. You will come out of this conversation less ignorant, if you pay close attention.

And work on those memes.

Seems clear to me genetics is part of it. (Recessive genes one would assume.)

And so what, it’s part of schizophrenia too.

Anyway, this faggot seems to think bumblebees can’t fly even though they do. Maybe he should look them up on Wikipedia and teach “his” son how they fly instead of repeating nonsense that’s almost as bad as “we only use 10% of our brains”.

My...I forget what grade, 2nd maybe, teacher told us blood was blue till it got oxygenated so if you were in space and got cut you’d bleed blue, that’s wrong on so many levels.

Lol, neither innate.

Your a degenerate ignoramus taking that bait since there is NO scientific evidence/consensus of what homosexuality even is (Did you even read the entire study plus the citations).

Hint: Male individuals have gone from performing fellatio and being a bottom (Which I believe you are judging by your defense of male-on-male sexual practices) to being in an exclusive heterosexual relationship and raising a natural biological family. Tell me how is that innate (And that is just one example of the desire, arousal, conformity conundrum)?

How the heck does a Western African dark pigmented individual suddenly morph into a light skinned far eastern Asian? Read the rest of the study and get back to me. You also never explained pedophilia, do you like sodomizing eight year old boys too, you sick individual?

Dude, you are soooo mad. You act like nobody's ever made you look retarded before. Maybe so. Maybe you live in a trailer in the Mojave desert far away from other people.

Learn to socialize, brah.

Your whole rant is from crazy town, but I'll address one point and one point only cause yer a hopeless case. Logic and reason has no effect on you.

Male individuals have gone from performing fellatio and being a bottom (Which I believe you are judging by your defense of male-on-male sexual practices) to being in an exclusive heterosexual relationship and raising a natural biological family.

See, this is where choice comes in. Its very possible and happens quite often that natural (born that way) homos CHOOSE not to follow their natural desires. Just as some natural non-homos may choose to act as homos.

Not all who call themselves and act as homosexuals born that way. And vicey versey.

Think of it this way, and it may help. Some people are born normal and are attracted to the opposite sex, and yet die of old age never having performed a sexual act. I know you're very familiar with this concept. People choose to have sex or not have sex.

What I'm talking about is natural homosexuals. Those who are physically and mentally attracted to the members of their own sex, even though they may know its wrong and unnatural and comes at a cost. The are compelled by their f'd up body chemistry, which was settled in the womb.

They are birth defects.

This is science and there is no argument against it.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.