Skip to comments.Live Thread - Impeachment Inquiry Hearings 11/21/2019
Posted on 11/21/2019 6:00:09 AM PST by maggief
Fiona Hill, former National Security Council senior director for Europe and Russia, will testify before the House Intelligence Committee on Thursday, Nov. 21, in the impeachment probe into President Donald Trump. Hill told lawmakers in closed-door testimony last month that then-national security adviser John Bolton expressed concerns that the Trump administration was trying to pressure Ukrainian officials. The focus of the impeachment inquiry is a July 25 phone call in which Trump asked Ukraine's president to investigate 2020 presidential candidate Joe Biden.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
I see. He doesn’t pass your “looks test”. so throw him under the bus.
The whole premise that our enemies prefer a Trump administration over a Hillary or Den administration is illogical...and ridiculous.
Hill did state that it was presumed Hillary would win. Anyone catch that?
CBS really talking up how you can hear on cell phone. Bald black dude saying he does it with his own mother. Holds the phone away from him
true..never understood the big push for him. Huge ego maniac.
His is 100% behind this push in some way
... which biased to outright false statements are the only statements that the vast majority of Amereicans will ever hear. ...infuriating and sad...
what brand cell phone was each person using?
The whole 3 year investigation looking for a crime is ridiculous. If the media were skeptical and non-partisan it would be laughed to a halt.
My sister in law is like that. I can hear her from the next room talking to my husband. The bigger point is, that there was nothing in the call that matters.
OK, they put up some talking point display boards behind the
republican side. Let’s see if hitler Schiff lets them keep them up or not.
“So appearance trumps competence for you? “
Did you even read my post? I said that the best lawyers are the ones that are never seen and never heard from. How is that “appearance?”
There is a bigger issue here about who is placing and covering for the deep state moles.
I've often thought of that and then I realize that the Senate has to confirm his appointments, and that's where the Swamp creeps in.
The only argument you can make and have it be plausible is, the Russians truly believed Hellary would start a war be the US & Russia.
Even with that it’s hard to hold a consistent narrative together.
Rudy is also an accomplished politician. He knows that Trump is being tried in the court of public opinion with the assistance of the MSM. You just have to look at the polls to see how successful the Dems have been in selling impeachment without the President being charged with a crime.
Trump needs more people waving their arms supporting him. Where are the Rep senators? Where are the hearings? The GOPe is MIA.
I was thinking that too.
Did you understand what you posted? You said Rudy, altho a good lawyer, was basically a messy slob. You know what? Mark me down as someone who is going to defend EVERY SINGLE FRIEND of president Trump, regardless of how they look to you.
In the humanities, not in the sciences.
I’m retired now, but in my previous life I handled litigation for major insurers; I dealt with lawyers and courts constantly, as that was my job. The ones I respected the most — and worried about if they were on the other side — were generally the quiet, methodical ones. Bombast and hyperbole make for good theater, but they generally fail (except with some juries, who just want to be entertained for their time, and can reward the side that entertains them the most).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.