On impeachment, Jim Jordan goes for the takedown

The Christian Science Monitor ^ | November 19, 2019 | Jessica Mendoza Staff writer

[GOPJ]

Based on how the House has destroyed these D witnesses, some of the guys in the Senate, like Hawley, Cotton, Scott, Cruz, Rand Paul, will eviscerate these people. Just my take.

I think you're right on every point... and person.

[laplata]

Hilarious!! Thank you!

Please see my tag line.

[matthew fuller]

"I know a great job for Jim Jordan come 2024...."

We think alike.

[matthew fuller]

I think Plosi is looking for the off ramp!

[nutmeg]

Great post, Larry... thanks!

[matthew fuller]

Sun Tzu?

[AppyPappy]

I don’t watch television so I miss everything

[painter]

like Hawley,

He is a BIG Trump supporter. He also young and ambitious. He is a former prosecutor and I bet he is chomping at the bit to make a name for himself.

[Freee-dame]

Is it possible that Senators will try to get Trump to agree to a quick vote in the. Senate, promising him exoneration? This will eliminate the possibility that he will be removed from office but also eliminate the possibility that dirty Senators and lots of others will be exposed. Trump is a fighter but knows how totally dirty so many politicians are, even some that are supposedly on his side.

[karnage]

I hope you are right.

You have a lot of both knowledge and contacts.

It’s possible that Dems overplayed their hand.

And self-interested Pubs see backing the President as a key to their own political survival.

Perhaps their calculus has changed. They have seen Trump fight, without giving an inch, for three years. He has weathered every storm.

The Pubs may not like Trump, and they may not want to be like Trump - but they want to win like Trump.

[FreeReign]

Check him out on YouTube.

[Agamemnon]

Agree with you Larry. For Trump it's bring it on time.

Trump fully expected to be impeached when the (D)'s took over and he has planned his counter attack accordingly long ago. Timing is everything, and I think the reason the Horowitz report has been delayed has in part been due to another famous Trump 3-D chess strategy.

The Shiff Show has been a blow out disaster for the (D)'s and any (D)'s that vote to impeach Trump based on the findings of the Shiff Show will suffer on that basis alone. Trump's polls rise, (D)'s calls for impeachment sink. This is 3-D strategy #1 successfully played.

Strategy 2 can be played whether House impeaches or not. Senate can do its own investigation and call witnesses. Since House set precedent for doing so, Senate can do their own investigation led by Graham. In any event Senate investigation provides the forum for opening the Horowitz can of whoop ass.

In the background - quietly - is John Durham's criminal investigation -- the guy who actually prosecutes what Horowitz and he have discovered. Add to this the recent Ukraine-led indictment of the Burisma clan. No telling what their discovery has uncovered Together this can effectively set up the prosecution of the entire Ukraine conspirators - Biden - Kerry Pelosi - under terms of the treaty signed in 1999 by Bill Clinton. This is truly "3-D" strategy -- a Trilateral Prosecution from which the Deep State Dept (or any of the Vindman/whistleblower "Oba-moles") will not escape.

Strategy 3: BiteMe bites the dust, but recall what he said in his quid-pro-quo call that he bragged about at the CFR:

“I had gotten,” he added, “a commitment from [President] Poroshenko and from [Prime Minister] Yatsenyuk that they would take action against the state prosecutor. And they didn’t. So they said they had — they were walking out to a press conference. I said, nah, I’m not going to — or, we’re not going to give you the billion dollars. They said, ‘you have no authority. You’re not the president.’”

“The president said — I said, call him,” Mr. Biden replied, evoking, the CFR transcript notes, laughter.

(Quoted from ‘Well, Son of a Bitch’ : Ukraine Scandal Is About Biden Editorial of The New York Sun | September 25, 2019)

Call who, BiteMe? Who is "him"?

You mean Obama was personally in on this racket too? As a sitting President" Only a full investigation will reveal this, right?

Who says you can't impeach a President retro-actively for crimes committed during his Presidency?

Strategy 4: Investigation into Obama gets to go anywhere ... just like it did with Mueller against Trump. Columbia U may be getting a call and a subpoena. Trump has a score to settle from an investigation which for him started back in 2011 with the phony birth certificate. Lots of Deep Staters covered for this prick, never mind re-opening Hillary's 33000 scrubbed eMails and Benghazi weapons trafficking cover-up. Might even open up pedo "Liddle" Adam Schiff's connections to the child trafficking cabal in WeHo at the Standard Hotel, hmmmmm?

You see where I am going with this?

FReegards!

[Grampa Dave]

We hope that you are correct here:

Based on how the House has destroyed these D witnesses, some of the guys in the Senate, like Hawley, Cotton, Scott, Cruz, Rand Paul, will eviscerate these people.

Just my take.

[Jamestown1630]

https://van2017.wordpress.com/2017/01/21/i-am-not-afraid-of-an-army-of-lions-led-by-sheep-i-am-afraid-of-an-army-of-sheep-led-by-a-lion/

[CincyRichieRich]

Is it possible that Senators will try to get Trump to agree to a quick vote in the. Senate, promising him exoneration? This will eliminate the possibility that he will be removed from office but also eliminate the possibility that dirty Senators and lots of others will be exposed. Trump is a fighter but knows how totally dirty so many politicians are, even some that are supposedly on his side.
...
Anything is possible I suppose...but it would be like carrying a scorpion on one’s back and it promise you it won’t sting you.