Skip to comments.
Problematic Women: Women Are Increasingly Embracing Socialism … but Why?
The Daily Signal ^
| June 13, 2019
| Lauren Evans and Kelsey Bolar
Posted on 06/13/2019 6:44:25 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 next last
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Here’s another question for you:
Why do women use makeup and perfume?
81
posted on
06/14/2019 5:27:06 AM PDT
by
utax
To: gaijin
Because they consider Government as a better provider than a husband. Correct. Too many weak men.
82
posted on
06/14/2019 5:29:03 AM PDT
by
Sirius Lee
(“Individual liberty and freedom are not outmoded concepts.”)
Comment #83 Removed by Moderator
To: gaijin
"Because they consider Government as a better provider than a husband." Bingo. I might change 'better' to a safety net (in some cases), but the sentiment is exactly right IMO.
84
posted on
06/14/2019 6:45:33 AM PDT
by
HangThemHigh
(Entropy is not what it used to be.)
To: gaijin
Because they consider Government as a better provider than a husband.
Yup. The institution of marriage has broken down in this society to such a degree that they've gone shopping for a more reliable means of support.
This also preys on the tendency of women towards compassion. "Well gee, no one should go without food, or shelter, or medical care. Doing Socialism would just be NICER than what we have now."
85
posted on
06/14/2019 7:16:22 AM PDT
by
Buckeye McFrog
(Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
To: HangThemHigh
"Because they consider Government as a better provider than a husband."
In many cases no husband, as a lot of young men now consider Tinder and porn to be a preferable alternative to alimony and a lifetime of legal harassment.
86
posted on
06/14/2019 7:17:36 AM PDT
by
Buckeye McFrog
(Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
To: sauropod
87
posted on
06/14/2019 8:18:01 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(This space for rent...)
To: the OlLine Rebel
re: “If they are naturally more protective...why would they desire more outward security from someone else?”
They seek passivity from the environment; govt (well, dem politicos) promise just that.
88
posted on
06/14/2019 8:28:25 AM PDT
by
_Jim
(Save babies)
To: gaijin
Because they consider Government as a better provider than a husband.
Theyve been indoctrinated to believe that, for many decades now. And women just love how it tastes.
But, the fruit of their belief is bitter, indeed: broken marriages, lower (single) income families, fatherless children, feminized children, high illegitimacy rates, boys on mental drugs, harsh judgement$ against fathers, high youth and male suicide rates, fewer marriages, demasculization and demonization of boys and men. Bad stuff for a society.
I believe the vile seed was sown in 1919.
89
posted on
06/14/2019 8:37:45 AM PDT
by
polymuser
(It's discouraging to think how many people are shocked by honesty and how few by deceit. Noel Coward)
To: exDemMom
Liberal women: so stupid they make the rest of us look bad.
More than just women who identify as liberal, imo.
90
posted on
06/14/2019 8:39:34 AM PDT
by
polymuser
(It's discouraging to think how many people are shocked by honesty and how few by deceit. Noel Coward)
To: shanover
They as a voting bloc will destroy the nation.
They ARE destroying the nation. Look around, listen, observe.
91
posted on
06/14/2019 8:40:52 AM PDT
by
polymuser
(It's discouraging to think how many people are shocked by honesty and how few by deceit. Noel Coward)
To: DoughtyOne
What did you think about the MSNBC and CNN bimbos going ga-ga over the creepy porn lawyer Michael Avenatti?
92
posted on
06/14/2019 8:41:55 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
(Send Ebola illegals from Congo to Martha's Vineyard - let them kill liberals elites first...)
To: the OlLine Rebel
Nah, youre simply reading forbidden, uncomfortable truths that are rarely spoken publicly.
Just like saying blacks are racist.
93
posted on
06/14/2019 8:42:53 AM PDT
by
polymuser
(It's discouraging to think how many people are shocked by honesty and how few by deceit. Noel Coward)
To: ProudGRITS
Do you realize what your post actually demonstrates?
94
posted on
06/14/2019 8:45:33 AM PDT
by
polymuser
(It's discouraging to think how many people are shocked by honesty and how few by deceit. Noel Coward)
To: GOPJ
I expect that kind of “stuff” out of the Leftists.
I’m concerned with middle class women and their ability to slide Left on some matters such as voting for Obama or some such.
Clinton would not have been president except for women, if I recall the numbers correctly.
It is concerning.
95
posted on
06/14/2019 8:46:30 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(This space for rent...)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Women’s equality notwithstanding, too many of them feel that they have to be taken care of.
96
posted on
06/14/2019 9:04:05 AM PDT
by
JimRed
( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
To: Lisbon1940
We should withhold sex from them until they come crawling back to capitalism. Capitalism is producing all those sex robots the girls love.
97
posted on
06/14/2019 9:05:49 AM PDT
by
itsahoot
(Welcome to the New USA where Islam is a religion of peace and Christianity is a mental disorder.)
To: polymuser
Women, like the impoverished, have a compulsion and need to acquire resources while having less skill to do so then the more able-bodied and capable. This imo is one of the reasons women and non-property holders were not given the vote in the Constitution. They would use government to acquire what they can not earn.
The property holding requirement is just common sense. The Constitution is not written for the needy or foolish. If someone lacks the wisdom the acquire and hold property they lack the wisdom for deciding the country’s course.
98
posted on
06/14/2019 9:10:27 AM PDT
by
Justa
To: Justa
There is NO requirement in the Constitution! Read it.
The STATES were to decide.
And guess what? Contrary to popular history, New Jersey allowed women voting in 1790 - long before WY. Problem was by 1820 or so it was abolished as some politician didn’t like losing because women didn’t like him. He managed to change it.
You’ve bought into the pop history of “property and white male”. That did not always hold and NEVER was in the Constitution!
BTW, thanks for all the veiled insults thrown in there against the people who BORE you. It’s a lot harder than sticking a stick in a hole.
99
posted on
06/14/2019 10:34:46 AM PDT
by
the OlLine Rebel
(Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs)
To: Justa
One of the strangest posts......ever.
100
posted on
06/14/2019 10:40:45 AM PDT
by
Mears
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson