Posted on 05/29/2019 11:34:04 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Sorry didn’t see your post until now. Please see my post #100 on this thread and remember, I’m not saying those examples are evidence, the Dems are.
Thank you for that, and I won’t shoot the messenger!
It still seems to me those items you cited hardly add up to evidence. More like innuendo. In fact doesn’t he contradict himself in part?
I just now read, on Redstate, that a joint statement has been put out by Barr and Mueller spokespersons, that Mueller absolutely did NOT mean to imply that the only reason the President wasn’t charged is because you can’t charge a sitting president. He’s had to backtrack, not that the demonrats will pay ANY attention to that. I’ll bet Barr ripped him a new one, after that stunt he pulled yesterday.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.