And what was the hair doing hanging in her face? Almost like she googled “what does a sex victim look like?”
Whether or not she got at the real incident, she formed vivid but false memories of something that didn't happen.
Not to mention, she misunderstood some straight questions. And didn’t know the committee had offered to fly to her? And she is a professor, who is used to public speaking.
Nice to see this article.
I was struck by all the media types saying how powerful and credible her testimony was. It’s as if the media types completely ignored everything about her appearance as noted by the writer of this article.
I don’t know if those were her real glasses or a prop, but the minute I saw them I knew something was off. They were dirty and made her look ridiculous. As her testimony went on (that voice) it was plain to see that she is a very disturbed individual. I hope and pray Mrs. Ford can someday come to the realization of how badly she was used and abused by that hag Feinstein.
Giant dirty glasses. Don’t know how she could do all that reading with such dirty glasses. I said yesterday she was probably swigging down Irish coffee and rum and coke. Still think so. Hair hanging in her face and slack mouthed. She was not all there. Couldn’t answer the most mundane questions. Sure, professors can be goofy but if this is the persona that stands at the lectern, her students would have eaten her alive decades ago.
My take is that the whole thing is concocted.
I believe the dems needed someone who could verify a loose connection to BK. They got on the phones to people from his yearbook, social circles, etc. They easily found someone who is a dem activist who would be very happy to come up with a story for a nice payment via gofundme.
This story was easy as pie to make up. Using the ol’ repressed memory meme, she could easily just not remember what it suited her to not remember. She came out as the week, pathetic, poor little injured bird with coke bottle glasses (poor thing - probably picked on by brute men constantly) and with that feeble trembling voice, she could just spew whatever they had rehearsed. There’s no way she was going to be pressured, lest the big bad Republicans come across as bullies.
I don’t believe she was sexually assaulted. I believe she was very sexually active, and perhaps that’s why she is unstable. Or perhaps she was sexually assaulted as a child, perhaps leading to her promiscuity.
This is a show - which is why there is no corroboration or witnesses. And no memory of where or when. It’s all BS.
I didn’t watch - couldn’t bear to - but after the first excerpt I heard on Rush I remarked she speaks like a sixteen-year-old. She’s a PhD clinical psychologist.... she reminds me of AOC - a highly educated know-nothing. Whether she’s self-deluded or an outright liar I dont care - she should withdraw from public view immediately and seek professional help.
Maybe she was trying to look older for tactical reasons - to attract sympathy. She certainly wasn't trying to look younger, as many people do. The absence of make-up may account for some of what the writer perceives, so I wouldn't dwell too much on appearances.
Has anyone asked her if she’s under the care of a psychiatrist for chronic mental health issues?
She was pathetic. I mean she looked and sounded deranged. Normal people do not behave like that
Oh! Furthermore, I believe the dems set up this so-called letter supposedly sent to Feinstein. Bull. This was just to get the ball rolling, maybe after the Washington Post didn’t bite. It’s all crap - all of it.
The “afraid to fly” thing sure evaporated.
It was all an ACT, designed to garner sympathy. EPIC FAIL.
Her csv/resume should be amended to include that she’s got two front doors. :)
But the left is one big safe space, and so long as you tow the party line, you are promised protection in their circles. IN fact, the more weak you are, the higher your status. The more disabilities, the higher your social rank.
That doesn't guarantee she's lying or subconsciously fabricating memories ... but it sure suggests it.
Lefties have a difficult time enough as it is distinguishing reality from the their own thinking and imagination ... add a little mental illness and there's no line between what's real and what isn't.
Ford was outright lying and Rachel Mitchell was effective in subtly exposing her deceptiveness on many levels. At the time I questioned the use of Mitchell, but in retrospect it worked to perfection.
There was NO ANGER in her voice.
I expected ANGER TO THE MAX.
There was NONE....................
Of course the entire thing is a fabrication. No doubt in my mind whatsoever. Zeo, nil, zilch credibility.