Posted on 09/18/2018 3:38:53 PM PDT by detective
No idea what this means. Presumably she wants the GOP to agree not to question Christine Blasey Ford about her personal background, e.g., sexual habits, drinking habits, and so forth, such that the hearing ends up with Ford being dragged through the mud.
I’m in the minority among the commentariat, though, in believing that it’s unlikely they’ll do that anyway. The optics of the hearing are already so terrible for Republicans, and the damage among women voters already so potentially grave, that they’ll be respectful of Ford out of self-interest if nothing else. Barring an unlikely meltdown of credibility at the hearing by Ford, it’s already a no-win situation for Republicans. Why make it worse by putting her through the wringer?
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
Are you making a joke?
If they can't meet the standard of Ford having to stand up to cross examination they shouldn't have the hearing. That's like someone on the stand in court who the defense isn't allowed to cross examine, unacceptable and not part of any reasonable hearing.
That means they can’t ask her what she was doing under the bleachers that certain day and to whom she was doing it?
So she can’t be asked any questions about her credibility. Got it.
Because that’s “blaming the victim.”
The ‘Rat position is that Blasey Ford should be allowed to roll her stinkbomb out with no one questioning her allegations, motives, history, or character.
We’ve seen this too many times. The GOP better stiffen their spines on this or election time will look very grim. No more folding. Fight!
Or how many times she went to unchaperonec house parties with older boys who were drinking.
lol
have a seat
Well, at least there will be no restrictions or conditions on Repubs asking about the rape. /sar
Hotgas is a useless Never trump site ..
Believe nothing from that Gope site.
I hate to say this but the Kavanaugh nomination is one additional reckless allegation away from being sunk. This is what concerns me, not the terms of the Monday hearing. Hey, it’s what the Ds do.
Oh i see. now it will be the Republican’s fault because they want to be mean to her and not abide by her “conditions”
go ()*)( yourself.
everyone outside the loons on the left sees this for what it is.
ain't buying it, she would've gone with a friend at that age
Hold the vote tomorrow.
Can’t hold the vote without getting two out of three women: Collins, Murkowski, Flake.
No conditions. There have been none on the poop-flinging Fartacus and Ugandan Giant to date to say anything they want about Kavanaugh, why should there be any on her?
I actually think they’ll have no problem getting Murky and Collins. That twat from Arizona, however...
Did you not watch the committee hearing? This isn’t respectful, it’s a knife fight.
Me-too-ers are out of control. Used to be, even if what she said had an iota of truth to it, misdeeds from youth were considered adventures, not scandals.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.