Posted on 06/20/2018 5:17:10 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
The FBI may have "edited and changed" key witness reports in the Hillary Clinton and Russia investigations, a top House Republican charged in a hearing into FBI and Justice Department misconduct Tuesday.
Freedom Caucus Chair Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C, also raised the possibility that the FBI misled the DOJ watchdog in an attempt to hide the identities of FBI employees who were caught sending anti-Trump messages.
The House Judiciary and Oversight committees were questioning Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz over his bombshell report into FBI and DOJ misconduct during the Hillary Clinton email probe.
"The other thing that I would ask you to look into, there is growing evidence that 302s were edited and changed,” Meadows told Horowitz. “Those 302s, it is suggested that they were changed to either prosecute or not prosecute individuals. And that is very troubling.”
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
I’m not impressed with Wray and don’t believe he understands the gravity of the situation at the corrupt FBI.
They are thick as thieves.
name the journalists who provided “gifts” to FBI agents.
let’s see how the names line up with those Clinton-friendly journos exposed in the Podesta emails.
We know the FBI is corrupt.
We know they make up stupid excuses AND believe their own excuses.
We can assume any crime within the FBI IS POSSIBLE
We know the FBI is corrupt.
We know they make up stupid excuses AND believe their own excuses.
We can assume any crime within the FBI IS POSSIBLE
Did the FBI kill Seth Rich? Or cover for the crime?
That sucking sound you hear is the Swamp swallowing up any and all truth it can.
YES! We need to know who, what, how, why, when in regards to gifts lavished upon FBI/DOJ officials via the propaganda media.
This would be key in finding the TRUE collusion before, during and after the election of our president DJT.
I love this is all coming back to haunt the leftist..and some of the RINO’s. Hint hint...McCain.
Hard to imagine why, in an era when tape recorders have been around for decades, the FBI allows the retention of agent “notes” to represent an interview...
—
How else can they fabricate “evidence” like they did with Mike Flynn?
Wray doesn’t understand the gravity of the situation?? No, HE DOESN’T CARE. And if he really doesn’t understand the gravity, he is too stupid or biased to be in charge of the FIB!
What won’t they do to cover stuff up?
RE-OPEN THE INVESTIGATION
shut up and do something about it
If I was a defendant in ANY CASE in court being prosecuted from an FBI investigation I would be bringing up this information.
Tell the jury that the FBI can not be trusted.
GREAT WORK COMEY, et al.
Such as? Besides voting properly.
What are you doing?
MAY have?
If 302’s were changed to reflect favorably or unfavorably on a witness, that would be Direct Evidence of bias influencing decisions made.
“There is growing evidence that the 302s were edited and changed...it is suggested that they were changed to either prosecute or not prosecute individuals.” -Meadows.
“>>There was a time in my younger and more innocent (ignorant) life when I thought the FBI and CIA were acting in our best interests. That youthful fantasy has long been crushed.
<<”
Agree. I’d like to add “the media” to your list.
>>“>>There was a time in my younger and more innocent (ignorant) life when I thought the FBI and CIA were acting in our best interests. That youthful fantasy has long been crushed.
<<”
Agree. I’d like to add “the media” to your list.<<
It was BBQToadRibs who authored the original post. I just added the actors we admired in their TV roles that gave us the impression.
But FWIIW, I do remember believing newspapers and TV news and in fact they were more truthful than not and kept their agendas for the most part to the opiions and editorials.
Of course as a adult I look back at that commie cronkite and watching his recorded broadcasts you can SEE the genesis of slanted, agenda-driven fake news reporting.
We all miss Murrow.
Every FBI conviction over the last 50 years MUST be overturned. It should only take one good Republican judge nearing retirement.
How many other criminal investigations & convictions that have nothing to do with Trump of politics will be challenged by defense attorneys over this kind of behavior???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.