Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump asks US trade representative to consider $100 billion in additional tariffs
CNBC ^ | 04/05/2018 | Chloe Aiello

Posted on 04/05/2018 4:09:49 PM PDT by SpeedyInTexas

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 last
To: chuckee

“Two arguments”

Actually, here is a 3rd argument. Produce some of the goods in the USA to avoid the 25% tariff.


101 posted on 04/06/2018 11:38:49 AM PDT by SpeedyInTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: CDB

Down 1% on an annual basis. Hey only will take 100 years to balance our trade.


102 posted on 04/06/2018 11:40:26 AM PDT by SpeedyInTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo
“the impact of China dumping US treasuries.”

"...Whatever debt China does sell is simply purchased by other countries. For instance, in August 2015 China reduced its holdings of U.S. Treasuries by approximately $180 billion. Despite the scale, this selloff did not significantly affect the U.S. economy, thereby limiting the impact that such an action may have on U.S. decision-making..."

Is it a risk for America that China holds over $1 trillion in U.S. debt?.

103 posted on 04/06/2018 11:58:44 AM PDT by CDB ("I thought that 'gun control' was shooting with both hands")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: QuigleyDU

Just say maybe or probably.


104 posted on 04/06/2018 1:11:42 PM PDT by mikhailovich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

China needs to be confronted about some of its practices (we have won against them in the WTO on many things but they just ignore the rulings), but many “average Americans” will also take a hit on their businesses and this will result in a loss of jobs even without the tariffs due to uncertainty - not to mention consumers getting less bang for their buck.

In addition, “trade deficits” aren’t just a number on paper - the part of it pertaining merely to the purchasing of goods is not a loss of wealth but an exchange of wealth. For example, if they are truly running the prices down on goods like steel to be less than their actual worth, then on that product they actually would have a trade deficit with us. But, there are also other aspects to a trade deficit than just this - such as them imposing tariffs on our own products and not opening their own market to our products.

The economics are far more complex and far reaching than you are describing. Bush also imposed steel tariffs which did not have a positive effect and caused more people to lose their jobs than those that gained and did damage to US GDP. That is not helpful to the “average American citizen” by any stretch of the imagination.


105 posted on 04/06/2018 10:42:02 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

It was indeed already underway - did Smoot-Hawley make it far, far worse and much longer lasting? Yes...then Roosevelt’s policies exacerbated it even further.


106 posted on 04/06/2018 10:45:54 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: central_va

The Tariff Act of 1930 (codified at 19 U.S.C. ch. 4), otherwise known as the Smoot–Hawley Tariff or Hawley–Smoot Tariff, was an act sponsored by Senator Reed Smoot of Utah and Representative Willis C. Hawley of Oregon and signed into law on June 17, 1930, that raised U.S. tariffs on over 20,000 imported goods to record levels.


107 posted on 04/07/2018 2:09:00 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

My understanding is the law was signed in 1930 but didn’t go into effect until 1931.


108 posted on 04/07/2018 7:38:13 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson