Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Good Read on "What Exactly is the DEEP STATE?"
American Intelligence Media ^ | 1-3-2018 | American Intelligence Media

Posted on 03/21/2018 10:28:25 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich

Most people know that a new president gets to name over 4,000 political appointees when they are elected. This political cronyism is partisan politics and fills our bloated government with unqualified employees.

Some think that these are the people that comprise the Deep State.

But the Deep State is much deeper than that.

There is a much more sinister system in place that controls Washington D. C.’s bureaucracies through an actual, organized shadow government called the Deep State.

It is the heart of the swamp.

And in this American Intelligence Media citizen intelligence report, we are going to show you exactly who they are and how we can remove them.

The Washington D. C. Deep State is a group of 8,156 appointed mangers in 75 federal agencies that control the executive bureaucracy and tell new political appointees what they can and cannot do. Yes, that’s right, the Deep State is an official government program, well-organized, comprehensive, and “in charge.”

Out of the 8,156 members who make up this Deep State of ensconced bureaucrats, over 7,000 were appointed by Obama.

(Excerpt) Read more at aim4truth.org ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: deepstate; obama; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: jjotto

Seems to me that 7,000 appointees just in Obama years is quite a high percentage, if they were following government employees rules and coming up through the ranks. I don’t really know what to believe these days though, so thanks for the information.


21 posted on 03/21/2018 2:05:57 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
The actual core of the Deep State is fewer than a hundred people.

While Hillary Clinton was SOS, there was no IG at DOS for 4 years. How was this possible? Sally Yates blocked the DOJ IG from having oversight over the counter intelligence division. Those are decisions that are made by cabinet level politicians. This kind of stuff is overlooked or ignored by congressional oversight committees.

22 posted on 03/21/2018 2:06:21 PM PDT by EVO X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

The office of a Senator or Congressman could shed light.

Or there’s research like looking at lists of jobs that are under SES.

https://www.federalpay.org/ses/level-5


23 posted on 03/21/2018 2:08:35 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

Thanks.


24 posted on 03/21/2018 2:09:57 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

I am sorry you are soooooo wrong. There is a deep state and they are rogue and under no authority but their own.


25 posted on 03/21/2018 2:12:36 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich
Out of the 8,156 members who make up this Deep State of ensconced bureaucrats, over 7,000 were appointed by Obama.

That's actually encouraging. Because that means that after 8 years, Trump should have at least that many appointed himself. Probably more because Trump doesn't take a lot of time off.

26 posted on 03/21/2018 2:21:15 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va
I am sorry you are soooooo wrong. There is a deep state and they are rogue and under no authority but their own.

Really? Who put them there and by what authority?
27 posted on 03/21/2018 2:42:09 PM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

It doesn’t matter. A perfect example is the FBI still wont turnover documents to congress. They are rogue and that is just one example.


28 posted on 03/21/2018 2:48:36 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: central_va
It doesn’t matter. A perfect example is the FBI still wont turnover documents to congress. They are rogue and that is just one example.

That's one example of the state, operating in broad daylight, in clear violation of the constitution. Nothing "deep" about that. That's what the state does when no one holds it accountable.
29 posted on 03/21/2018 2:52:11 PM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: central_va
A perfect example is the FBI still wont turnover documents to congress. They are rogue and that is just one example.

How is this aspect of the executive branch operating as a "rogue" bureaucracy an example of a "deep state"? By contrast, can you name one aspect of the federal government that is acting "above board" and within it's constitutional limits as an example of the "good state" as opposed to the "deep state"? I can't seem to lay my finger on one aspect of the federal government that is struggling against this so-called, ambiguous and nefarious "deep state".
30 posted on 03/21/2018 3:04:59 PM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich

Okay, please cut to the chase and tell us how they recommend Trump get rid of them.


31 posted on 03/21/2018 3:33:54 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

I think they are still under civil service rules so almost as good as being in a union. I know when Carter set up the SES program they supposed to be under far less civil service protections. I am sure in the past 40 years those “protections” have crept back in.


32 posted on 03/21/2018 3:43:00 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

I wish i knew how!!!


33 posted on 03/21/2018 4:07:37 PM PDT by CincyRichieRich (There are no more accidents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich

So are they false in their claim that they show how they can be removed?


34 posted on 03/21/2018 4:30:04 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich

Toward the end of 2015 and into 2016 Valerie Jarrett had many non-career appointees move to career appointees because it is hard to get rid of career appointees. It isn’t as hard a getting rid of a civil service employee but it isn’t easy.


35 posted on 03/21/2018 4:39:00 PM PDT by tschatski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich

Read and skimmed enough to comment.

“Trump can’t fire us”. no.. arrest them.
There is something desperately wrong if there is any law that says barack can set up a treasonous bunch to rule, and not be fired by the new President. FIRE THEM ALL!!


36 posted on 03/21/2018 4:44:35 PM PDT by frnewsjunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reily

Protections!
Words used make this law?
I’m not a cusser.. but this makes one want to become one.
Cant stand to see all this.. dont say it cant be changed. Barack can do this.. then we can do whatever it takes


37 posted on 03/21/2018 4:51:49 PM PDT by frnewsjunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Awww.. how,disappointing. I though for sure they wanted to repeal Obama care, build a,wall, decrease spending and enact national reciprocity.
Maybe if we,keep voting for them they will do what they promised day one.


38 posted on 03/21/2018 5:21:18 PM PDT by momincombatboots (No Wall, No Way 2018.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots
Awww.. how,disappointing. I though for sure they wanted to repeal Obama care, build a,wall, decrease spending and enact national reciprocity. Maybe if we,keep voting for them they will do what they promised day one.

Yeah, we gotta have our dreams afterall.
39 posted on 03/21/2018 7:43:53 PM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots
Awww.. how,disappointing. I though for sure they wanted to repeal Obama care, build a,wall, decrease spending and enact national reciprocity. Maybe if we,keep voting for them they will do what they promised day one.

Yeah, we gotta have our dreams afterall.
40 posted on 03/21/2018 7:44:15 PM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson