Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary’s Back from the Dead; She Should Have Stayed Buried
Townhall.com ^ | March 15, 2018 | Shawn Mitchell

Posted on 03/15/2018 5:47:31 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: robroys woman

I have another theory based on social science research into the matter. First I need to not that like the two social scientists interviewed, I too am a social scientist.

Single liberal women either vote democrat because their families voted democrat, they have taken a drink from the “I hate all men” well or because they are subjected to group think more than their married counterparts and the result is they fall in line with the propaganda, hoping to fit in.

Another theory I have is after 30 years in or around politics, Hillary from day one had clouds of corruption and left wing ideology swirling above her head, in the open for all to see. Those blinded by their left wing ideology put their hands over their ears and said, “I can’t hear you” while logic and reason said if Hillary wasn’t in politics she would be locked away at Joliet.

A third theory, (yes, I am a very busy social scientist) said over half of the country despises the shrew for the exact things she is going around the world saying to anyone who will give her the time of day. She despises middle America, she hates women, minorities and those in the lower income classes, yet she poorly makes attempts to say she is one of them, after bashing them. For her constituency and the liberal mindset, this is akin to wanting to make peace with those committed to destroying you. We saw shades of this with her reset button and Russia, which she bungled, demonstrating another side or her that many Americans see; her incompetence.


21 posted on 03/15/2018 6:12:39 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (What is a Blue City? First world cities run by third world politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

“Hillary Clinton explained the female problems......”..

The only “female problems” that caused her loss to Trump was SHE herself. Should she plan to run again in 2020, she will have to “transgender” to be rid of those personal female problems. Better yet, she should croak and save us all a lot of anguish.


22 posted on 03/15/2018 6:17:41 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Interestingly, Hillary’s fall is attributable in part to her overweening self-importance. As with many ancient archaeological sites (and many temples and other constructions still in use) in India, the stone steps she was walking down were heavily worn in the middle, having been polished smooth by tens of thousands of feet. Had Hillary walked down the stairs by stepping on the treads on one side or the other, she would have had an easier time maintaining her footing. I know I’ve nearly slipped once or twice while climbing or descending worn temple steps in India, and I’m in much better health than she is.

However, she (apparently) had to maintain the appearance of the Most Important Person in the vicinity, and tried to regally descend those steps as if she owned the place. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if someone hadn’t advised her not to use the middle of the steps, and she ignored it since it came from someone “lesser” than her.


23 posted on 03/15/2018 6:19:50 AM PDT by Little Pig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

At this point, Hillary Clinton is a complete joke. Republicans love seeing her in the news because we know she will inevitably put her foot in her mouth and say something grating, stupid or obnoxious. Dems cringe when she is in the news. Its so satisfying. This is a woman who held political power and used it to advance a corrupt, radical Left agenda and to shamelessly enrich herself, for most of my adult political life. Now she’s a bitter joke. I’ll say it again: that is so satisfying. It would be icing on the cake if she was indicted on some criminal charges. I won’t hold my breath on that though. I guess I’d settle for a video surfacing of her being visibly drunk and ranting and raving about how much she hates conservative voters and how unfair life is followed by a crying jag.


24 posted on 03/15/2018 6:20:08 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

There she goes, again.......lacerating women.

The mean old crone apparently is oblivious to her own mouthings.

Since her husband got lewinskied in the Oval Office, Hillary has been on a rampage against women.

With our tax dollars she ran a Bimbo Eruption Team in the WH that operated for eight years to put-down demean and diminish any woman who dared accuse her penis-twitching husband.

The loser oughta wake up and realize somebody out there in those “backward states” is connecting the dots.


25 posted on 03/15/2018 6:25:06 AM PDT by Liz ((Our side has 8 trillion bullets;the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Kretschmer’s research, is that single women tend to cast votes with the fate of all women in mind, while women married to men vote on behalf of their husbands and families.”

So it is female group think vs pressure by husbands. Either way, women don't use their own independent rational judgment

26 posted on 03/15/2018 6:25:53 AM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

How is her hand doing?


27 posted on 03/15/2018 6:28:09 AM PDT by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

What is so remarkable about the Clintons is the contrast in their basic political makeup. While they both share the same level of corruption and narcissistic ambitions, Bill’s political instincts are platinum-level while Hillary’s are tin - if not wooden. It has always been so - however, Hillary’s ambitions are much stronger than Bill’s; it’s obvious she’s been the driving force behind their ascent to power.

Extreme political ambition, zero instincts. Does she realize this singular inability in herself? Hard to say; I’m sure she has built iron-clad psychological barriers to prevent such self-examination. But the doubts probably creep in from time to time. And the excuses she’s concocted for her failures will at times likely fail her defense mechanisms. This may be the root cause of her alcoholism.


28 posted on 03/15/2018 6:28:53 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It’s VERY SIMPLE. Married women usually have kids - they have a reason to vote to NOT DESTROY our country.

Single women, at least in this context, simply hate men and vote to screw over men, which means they vote Democrat.

So I’d say the MORE IMPORTANT question is why do single women vote to destroy this country, when the vast majority of them, even if they have no kids, have relatives that they love who do have kids? It’s not for economic reasons, as they generally made decent money...so maybe the answer is as I stated above?

(obviously I’m generalizing here...and there are plenty of conservative, America-loving, single women - just not the majority)


29 posted on 03/15/2018 6:29:54 AM PDT by BobL (I shop at Walmart and eat at McDonald's...I just don't tell anyone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leep

Looks like she just got a haircut and still has the barber’s cape on.


30 posted on 03/15/2018 6:36:48 AM PDT by dblshot (I am John Galt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
Some glaring examples of the Clintons using the Clinton Foundation while she was Secy of State.
How the Clintons got-rich-quick---just from foreign entities.

============================================

LEGEND---Donation to Clinton Foundation/Global Initiative (CGI)--followed by favor conferred in return.

================================================

<><>Prince of Abu Dhabi and Foreign Minister of the United Arab Emirates
Shaikh Abdullah bin Zayed al Nahayan and the Al Nahayan family of Abu Dhabi. <$5,000,000 Access to HRC at State Dept. and a $500,000 environmental speech by Bill Clinton given at the Emirates Palace Hotel in Abu Dhabi while HRC was meeting in Washington with Shaikh Abdullah.

<><> Algeria <$500,000 State Dept clearance for U.S. arms sales to Algeria. Deal included biological and chemical agents.

<><>Australia, Commonwealth of <$75,000,000 Strong State Dept. for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), which stands to be a boon for Australian multinational firms.

<><>Bahrain, Kingdom of <$250,000 Muted criticism by State of Bahrain’s abysmal human rights practices.

<><>Boeing Corp.<$900,000 State Dept. clearance for $29 billion arms U.S. arms sale to Saudi Arabia, including Boeing’s F-15 fighter.

<><>Brunei Darussalam, Sultanate of < $5,000,000 State Dept. clearance for U.S. weapons sales to Brunei.

<><>Cameroon, Republic of<$100,000 Influence buying by the Cameroon government with the Clinton State Department.

<><>Govt of Canada <$500,000 State Dept. support for Canada’s Keystone XL pipeline, later vetoed by Obama.

<><> Chagoury Group <$5,000,000 in cash and a $1,000,000,000 pledge HRC delayed designating Nigeria’s Boko Haram as a foreign terrorist organization because of Chagoury Group’s investments and operations in Nigeria. Chagoury Group received the “Sustainable Development Award” from the CGI. Chagooury helped the family of Nigerian dictator Sani Abacha hide his wealth stolen from Nigeria’s oil revenues.

<><> Confederation of Indian Industry <$1,000,000 Access for Indian businesses to U.S. government officials.

==========================================

In addition to the Clinton Global Initiative, there are separate
Clinton family foundations that maintain their own revenue streams.
All these entities maintain separate operations for the Clintons’
pay-to-play global racketeering operations
:

<><>the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI),

<><>the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton (BHCC) Foundation,

<><>the Clinton Foundation Hong Kong,

<><> William J. Clinton Foundation Charitable Trust (Kenya),

<><>William J. Clinton Foundation Charitable Trust (UK),

<><> the Clinton Foundation Insalingsstiftelse (Sweden).

<><> the Clinton/Guistra Partnership, Canada.

=====================================

Note that all of the Clinton's activities operated as a shadow government----setting up the foreign policy machinery for when she was elected president. It's obvious these govt entities were sown a carrot on a stick --- promised much b/c they had a potential US president in their hip pockets.

31 posted on 03/15/2018 6:37:48 AM PDT by Liz ((Our side has 8 trillion bullets;the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Hillary would have won if only we had the secret ballot in this country and married women didn't have to vote as their husbands told them to.

/s

32 posted on 03/15/2018 6:39:12 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Kretschmer called her story “the clearest, most heartbreaking validation of our article that I had ever heard.”

So why is it heartbreaking that the democrat woman who voted for Trump voted for her own interests?

Isn’t that exactly what these leftists are always screaming for women to do?

I know, I know .. only if it fits the agenda.


33 posted on 03/15/2018 6:49:10 AM PDT by Heart of Georgia (truth will trump their lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Women most like her may be white and married but she’s not heterosexual.

Hillary says white married woman are “standing by their men”. She has stood by her man when he raped women and then tried to destroy the women.


34 posted on 03/15/2018 6:53:44 AM PDT by Terry Mross (Liver spots And blood thinners..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross

Exactly.


35 posted on 03/15/2018 6:57:11 AM PDT by Kaslin (Politicians are not born; they are excreted -Civilibus nati sunt; sunt excernitur. (Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig
The wear pattern on well-used stone or concrete steps approximates an up-side-down Normal probability distribution curve, from the random steps of the large number of people using the steps.
36 posted on 03/15/2018 7:28:54 AM PDT by JoeFromSidney (,uld')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Female suffrage is a force multiplier for married men, and it's intensified when they have voting-age daughters.

When I had two grown daughters still at home, they and their mother would have me go to the poll first on election day, so that they could find out how I voted. Then they all went in and voted the same.

Pressure? Only if I tried to send any of them in first! Then the pressure would be on -- ME!

37 posted on 03/15/2018 7:33:38 AM PDT by thulldud ("What makes it news is its dissemination, not its concrete reality." -- Ellul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leep

We keep saying that she stumbled, and she lost her footing, etc.

And we say that this means she isn’t very healthy. Certainly not spry.

But you guys have it all wrong. What you saw there was called “Slithering down the stairs” and it means she’s healthy and slithering.

Its the standing that isn’t healthy for this vomitous worm in pantsuits.


38 posted on 03/15/2018 7:38:21 AM PDT by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

39 posted on 03/15/2018 7:46:06 AM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Why do we keep giving her an audience. If we ignore her, or better yet, laugh at her, she’ll lose her sway over the political landscape.

Can we get the IRS to take away the Foundation’s charitable exemption based on how little charity it performs? While we’re at it, task the IRS to review ALL such exemptions.


40 posted on 03/15/2018 7:56:14 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson