Posted on 02/20/2018 9:16:27 AM PST by SeekAndFind
The effort to explain away Hillary Clinton's loss to Donald Trump began as a propaganda operation the morning after the election results came in. Defense of the Russia collusion hoax requires a sinister foe that might have swung the election. There is every incentive for the propaganda masters to present information in ways that lends itself to exaggeration. So skepticism is warranted toward everything you hear from the media and even from the Mueller probe itself; it is, after all, the spawn of Hillary's campaign-sponsored Steele dossier and staffed by rabid partisans who donate only to Democrats.
Ever since the 13 indictments were announced last Friday, exactly in time to distract public attention from the FBI's bungling that cost 17 people their lives in Parkland, Florida, we have been hearing about "millions" of dollars spent by the Russians "per month." It's become a major talking point. For example, the staid magazine Foreign Policy [i]:
The endeavor, at one point, had a budget of $1.25 million a month, allowing it to pay hundreds of operatives to engage in a surreal campaign meant to interfere in American democracy that appears to have been financed in part through a catering company (one that reportedly treats workers poorly, at that).
But what is the source of this contention? Even if you credit the figure with six zeroes, how many months does it apply to? The Mueller indictment offers scant evidence.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
I was wondering about these millions spent when the advertising was apparently just a couple thousand a month. But then I thought that if the Russians had 80-90 people employed since about 2014, the payroll over that period could be a few millions. FWIW.
I heard they spent about $3,000.
$3,000 apart from payroll, if any.
Did the Russians really spend ‘millions’ trying to swing the election? (Where’s the evidence?)
______________________________________________
If those 13 Russian bloggers had ‘millions’ to spend, then someone - please - show me how to become a Russian blogger.
We all know how humble feels about bloggers, but hey. If the pay is that good....
Russians were against Hillary when she was running against Sanders.
Russians were against Trump when he was running against Hillary.
Russians NEVER did ANYTHING against Sanders... remember when Sanders honeymooned in Moscow? Yep, his first choice.
There was a profit motive around the world in poor (but smart) countries to run positive stories on Trump generating facebook hits Here’s a link to one story - not the best one ... lost that link...
https://www.slavorum.org/how-macedonian-teen-helped-donald-trump-to-win-president-elections/
The problem is if the Russians were trying to spread confusion and to sow discord, they did a spectacularly half-assed job of it.
None of which approaches the meddling alarmism propagated by the fake news media and Democrats.
In the end, we’re left with more questions than answers and if anything seems clear, the Russian government isn’t that invested in subverting our political institutions.
The real irony is the people who refuse to accept the verdict of our democratic process are the fake news media and Democrats who slanderously assert that the Russians somehow helped to elect Trump.
For which no real proof whatsoever exists. And the people laughing at us are the Russians who are amused their puny efforts at sowing divisions among Americans have widened the partisan divide here beyond their wildest dreams.
Placing ads is to interfere in American democracy.
Oh wait it’s democrat logic.
Anything they said or did had already been done by American Citizens. The crime is that they were not “American Citizens”.....or were they?
Free Press in Americans is not for foreigners. Since when?
They allegedly posed as American citizens.
If they were, Mueller’s indictment would be unconstitutional because the government in effect is punishing people for advocating politically incorrect thoughts.
Or the wrong candidate. This is the basis, seriously, of Mueller’s indictment.
Maybe they should be asking if Soros attempted to sway the election and hire people to protest and create chaos.
Doesn’t make too much sense. All they had to do was join a twitter discussion that was anti-Hillary. Then it would be a Russian agreeing with an American. Where’s the crime??
I am thinking that the Russians should call Muellers bluff.
If each of these Russians were to show up all on the same day, turn themselves in for arrest, insist on a jury trial and refuse to waive speedy trial, Mueller’s head would explode within 60 to 120 days.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l84dB0hiDp8&t=650s This is the spending
According to Facebook general counsel (testimony before congress) total spent was $46,000. Testimony before the senate item committee total was about $100,000.
This $1M per month is typical Dem talking point BS. Several Dem pundits have been corrected on panels but they continue repeating it.
item=intel
What we have when litany of evil is actually unwound is something a 12-year-old kid might tell his Dad to explain an embarrassing browser search history. The rallies that were attempted to be fomented were for both sides, and averaged an attendance that you could fit into a fair-sized Starbucks. The author has managed to come up with a picture of one of these featuring that noted Trump follower Michael Moore. This stuff isn't covert, it's available to anyone with an Internet connection, a search engine, and a little patience.
It will, of course, never reach a courtroom, which is precisely the point of the indictments. Along the way, though, we learn that people running the investigation are not only arrogant blowhards spending millions of the taxpayers' dollars in order to try to steer the government in a direction different from the one the voters have indicated is theirs, they're technical morons. These are apparatchiks who tremble at one 70-year-old guy typing with his thumbs on Twitter. The Man Behind The Curtain turns out to be more pathetic then we even thought, and deserves the howling derision he's getting on the Internet.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.