Posted on 02/17/2018 11:03:21 AM PST by Oklahoma
As the Wall Street Journal observes in the related editorial today (behind the Journal’s paywall): “The 37-page indictment contains no evidence of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign, but it does show a systematic effort to discredit the result of the 2016 election. On the evidence so far, President Trump has been the biggest victim of that effort, and he ought to be furious at Vladimir Putin.”
The Journal editorial asks a good question: “The indictment also makes us wonder what the Obama Administration was doing amid all of this. Where were top Obama spooks James Clapper and John Brennan? Their outrage became public only after their candidate lost the election. If they didn’t know what was going on, why not? And if they did, why didn’t they let Americans in on the secret? President Obama sanctioned Russia for its meddling only after the election.”
(Excerpt) Read more at powerlineblog.com ...
Zero can always claim that’s why he kicked out those 35 Russian diplo corps.
Crapper to busy Lying
Did Mueller’s “non-partisan”, “open-minded” team investigate whether there was any Mexican, Chinese, Canadian, German French social media meddling in the American election?
Well we know he obviously didn't, because he always only learned about things after seeing it in the press. /sarcasm
The indictments seem to me to be much to do about very little.
It would appear the Russian efforts were trivial compared to the free speech efforts of “The View” or “Jimmy Kimmel”. Compared to the vindictive harangues of Maxine Waters, the Russian product amounts to very little.
There were indictments but I don’t know what laws were broken and there is certainly no convictions with proofs of guilt
Or Iranian.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.