Posted on 02/07/2018 5:10:17 AM PST by Kaslin
The news is filled with reports that Republicans in Washington are "attacking" the FBI over the Trump-Russia investigation.
The Washington Post recently compiled a collection of statements by GOP lawmakers under the heading, "Republicans launch attack after attack on the FBI." The New York Times ran a news analysis headlined, "Trump's Unparalleled War on a Pillar of Society: Law Enforcement."
Those words have been echoed many, many times by various talking heads on television.
But have Republicans really been attacking the FBI? The bureau is a big organization -- about 35,000 people. It does many different things. A more accurate way to describe what Republicans are doing is that they are condemning the FBI leadership's handling of two of the most heavily politicized investigations in years -- the Trump-Russia probe and the Hillary Clinton email investigation. All that proves is that when law enforcement wades into politics, it becomes the target of sometimes intense political criticism.
That is an entirely different thing from attacking the FBI as an institution or attacking the role it plays in government.
The FBI does enormously valuable, sometimes heroic things. It breaks up terrorist rings and catches killers and bank robbers and kidnappers and embezzlers and all sorts of bad actors in our society. It investigates complex crimes that victimize large numbers of Americans. Its agents sometimes give their lives to protect the public.
The FBI has a Hall of Honor that recognizes agents who have been killed in the line of duty. Thirty-six agents have been killed "as the result of a direct adversarial force or at or by the hand of an adversary." The most recent was murdered in 2008 while executing an arrest warrant on violent drug traffickers in Pennsylvania.
Another 30 FBI employees are honored for having died in the performance of their duty, although not necessarily in direct confrontation with a criminal. The most recent are several who contracted serious illnesses while aiding recovery efforts in Washington, New York and Pennsylvania immediately after the September 11 terrorist attacks.
That kind of selflessness and dedication is clearly not what Republicans are criticizing.
What Republicans are condemning is the FBI leadership's conduct in the Trump and Clinton probes. For example, in the case of the much-discussed House Intelligence Committee memo released last week, Republicans (accurately) portrayed an FBI leadership that made common cause with an opposition research project paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign right in the middle of a 2016 presidential election -- and then ferociously resisted congressional oversight. An agency that does that can expect some criticism, if its actions ever come to light.
"It's quite obvious that the Intelligence Committee is only questioning the decisions made by a small number of FBI officials at the highest levels," said committee spokesman Jack Langer. "In fact, we've been hearing from a large number of FBI employees, both active and retired, who have asked us to continue the oversight work we're doing."
For all the good it does, the FBI has made some horrendous mistakes. After the post-9/11 anthrax attacks, for example, the bureau focused its search for the perpetrator on an Army scientist named Steven Hatfill. There was a lot of pressure on the FBI to solve the case, and there was a lot of headquarters involvement. But Hatfill was innocent. Nevertheless, the FBI chased him relentlessly, destroying his reputation and ability to make a living. Only after years did the FBI turn toward another suspect, who killed himself before charges could be filed. The FBI had to pay Hatfill millions in damages.
The bureau, led by then-director Robert Mueller, didn't seem terribly sorry about it. When the Justice Department "formally exonerated Hatfill, and paid him $5.82 million in a legal settlement," columnist Carl Cannon wrote last year, "Mueller could not be bothered to walk across the street to attend the press conference announcing the case's resolution. When reporters did ask him about it, Mueller was graceless. 'I do not apologize for any aspect of the investigation,' he said, adding that it would be erroneous 'to say there were mistakes.'"
Today Mueller is, of course, the special counsel investigating the Trump-Russia affair. But one could list a number of other non-heroic episodes under different directors in the bureau's history, starting with the first, J. Edgar Hoover.
So the FBI has deserved its share of criticism over the years. And that goes double when the bureau intrudes into politics. So no, Republicans are not attacking the FBI writ large. But when the nation's premier investigative agency, with all its formidable law enforcement powers, jumps in the middle of hot political disputes, no one should be surprised when things get political.
It is always “Republicans” or “Trump” attacking the FBI as if they are doing so for no reason.
There is no acknowledgement that the FBI was attacking Republicans and/or Trump which sparked this response. I guess that’s because such an acknowledgement would work against liberal democrat goals. Can’t have that.
same dirtbag media outlets that applauded as left wingers marched in the streets of NY shouting “what do we want? dead cops! when do we want them? now!!”
Schumer made a physical threat by insinuating that you don’t go against the intelligence organization if you know what’s good for you. Is lying slime Schumer insinuating that Trump is asking for a Dealey Plaza special by criticizing the upper echelon of the FBI, CIA?
The thing that the Brown Shirt Media is assiduously ignoring is that what was “tinfoil hat” level conspiracy delusion two weeks ago is now accepted fact: the 0bama regime and Hillary wiretapped the Trump campaign. Ponder that for just a minute. Seems to me that alone should have more than a few people doing perp walks today but who am I?
The President should give the stinking democrat memo to the FBI to redact. Then they would be blamed for trying to hide information rather than the FBI White House.
Trump redactions are just a trap to show he’s “hiding” things with this memo.
If you’re not following George Webb you’re behind the curve... https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrQ-wHKVi0JDWjQGcuoYnew
I would just tell Schiff, Swallows well and Co. to have patience; the FBI and DOJ are only the beginning. We’re about to launch all-out frontal attacks on a number of other liberal, big government institutions as well.
True.
So much more to be revealed.
Agreed. And remember all the mockery they slung at Trump for saying he was being tapped and spied upon?
Crazy how they aren’t apologizing for that, printing retractions right? In a sane world that’s what needs to happen.
In reality the Republicans have been exposing serious corruption in the FBI.
Are the NYT and Washington Post making false claims that are seditious and treasonous?
They are part of the vast left wing conspiracy in league with anti-American Democrats. Shameful!
We have the biggest scandal in the history of our Republic unfolding, and the deeply corrupt media is pretending it is something else! They are trying to muddy the water, but that tactic will NOT work!
They will self-destruct under the weight of their own hate for our country and our president.
I understand Wray is quietly cleaning out FBI headquarters and establishing new rules, regulations and SOP to assure it never goes rogue again. It would be very helpful to the FBI if he would indicate he is doing so to the public. He doesn’t need to say what steps he is taking, just the fact that he is.
One step he should make public is what is being done about married agents that begin a sexual relationship. That should be cause for termination.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.