Jamelle Bouie
Posted on 02/03/2018 6:29:08 AM PST by C19fan
Exactly!
What astonishes me is that the Dems assume that a merit based system will exclude black people-——— THAT’S what I would call racism.
.
Sorry America is a white country with minorities. If it ain’t broke don’t fix it.
I think I’ve read something like that recently. “SJWs Always Lie.”
The same type of people yelling racism are the same whom praise the so called Browning of America.The cohesion Trump espouses isn’t national or ideological. It is racial.
The Republican Party was founded on the limitation, and soon the abolition, of slavery. Blacks - up until the 1960s or 70s they preferred to be called ‘negros’ - were Republicans until the 1930s, when the Democrats started buying black votes. And blacks sold their allegiance for a very modest price. They were in bad straits and . . .As Democrats, blacks now have to hold the position that they don’t have to work because they aren’t white - but let a conservative black immigrate from the Caribbean - or from Africa - and DemoBlacks cry “Foul!” if such nonpeople get counted toward black
quotas“goals.”Democrats claim Republicans are white racists, all the while promoting poisonous policies towards poor people which seduce them into selling their birthright for “a mess of pottage.” “Self esteem” based on arrogance is no substitute for the real thing - respect based on willingness to find a way to be useful - another way of saying, “getting a job.”
Jamelle Bouie
Slate article confesses merit based immigration weeds out undesirables due to skin color.
This article is racist and demeaning by assuming white immigrants are more intelligent than immigrants of color.
You make some reasonable points.
I certainly did, judging from the name. Oh Well.
Merit-based immigration is rational immigration is color-blind immigration.
“This article is racist and demeaning by assuming white immigrants are more intelligent than immigrants of color”
Does the article say ALL white immigrants are more intelligent than ANY immigrant of color?
No.
OK. Now, define “racist” in a way that is both a) accurate and b) makes your accusation against the Slate author make sense.
“So obviously racist on the part of the author (and pols like Pelosi) to proclaim that a merit-based system excludes non-white people”
Can you define “racist” in a way that would make your accusation against the author and pols like Pelosi true?
1. Explain why policies that would result in more Whites are bad
2. Explain why policies that would result in less Whites are good
If Whites are bad, Whites deserve to be chased, erased, and replaced.
If Whites are not bad, Whites do not deserve to be chased, erased, and replaced.
The only reason would be if Whites are evil, which is exactly the position that liberals promote.
Civilization’s guardians.
In the whole wide world, only 16% of the people are white. Whites are the real minority. 84% of the whole wide world is non-white, and most that is shi+holes.
White people are the true minority in earth terms. And the left is determined to destroy that. Mark my words, if white folks were to disappear, this planet would shortly thereafter turn into a smoking nuclear cinder, after the brown tribesmen went at it with each other with nuclear weapons.
It’s white people who work everyday to keep a lid on the stewing pot of shi*holes.
_______________
And who would create and maintain those cell phones that the non-whites are attached to like glue?
Me? Heavens no! I was just using THEIR definition of racism. I assume they think non whites have no merits, since a merit based system is automatically exclusionary. I do appreciate the snarky nature of your question, though! Carry on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.