Posted on 01/27/2018 11:39:47 AM PST by bitt
I've seen reports that the avg IQ of a Muzzie is around 92 - the same as Mexicans. If the leadership is around 125+ (that is, 2 std dev above 100, the classic IQ range for higher professionals), then it's quite trivial to control the masses through military and police. Which is exactly what we see throughout MENA and Mexico.
Libprogs are quite confident they can simply keep the masses of Muzzie hoards down with a small cadre of information, economic & power tools. I tend to agree, which is why I understand they have no intention at all of wondering if they will be 'welcomed'. All Morlocks will be segregated, regardless of religion.
When/if an honest history is written about the past 30 years, future generations will marvel at the deceit and governments around the world falling into the Clinton money trap:
<><> Norway donates $500 million to Clinton Foundation.
<><>Prime Minister Stoltenberg is made head of NATO in Europe
<><> Obama wins Nobel Prize after only 11 days as Pres.
==============================================
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/north_america/2016-u-s-presidential-election/foreign-governments-cutting-off-funding-for-hillary/
<><>Comey gets millions from Lockheed Martin, a Clinton Foundation donor and then taints the FBI.
<><>Obama's Justice Dept was mostly corrupt before they had to shield the Clintons but shield they did...they stepped right up to the plate when they had to...but having been the driving force behind Eric Holder's Fast & Furious, shielding corrupt people was no big leap for them.
As Americans, we demand a full airing of the actions of the Clinton/Obama admins over the past few years.
The MSM's pro-Clinton agenda goes back before they arrived on the scene, but certainly accelerated when the Clintons arrived on the national scene. Huge failure by MSM to provide honest, objective information when America needed it most.
===============================================
AFTERMATH (hat tip grampadave) Bubba was a great Ponzi scheme artist maybe the greatest before the Clintoon balloon crashed and burned. Elites have invested millions/billions on the influence of the Clintoons. Now, those investments have zero value for their bad judgement investments. Heads will roll from sea to sea as those who invested their millions now will get nothing of value from the Clintoons.
If the case proceeded, Switzerlands largest bank would face an impossible choice: Violate Swiss secrecy laws by handing over the names, or refuse and face criminal charges in U.S. federal court.
Within months, Mrs. Clinton announced a tentative legal settlementan unusual intervention by the top U.S. diplomat. UBS ultimately turned over information on 4,450 accounts, a fraction of the 52,000 sought by the IRS, an outcome that drew criticism from some lawmakers who wanted a more extensive crackdown.
Well, the Swiss may have gotten off pretty easy, but at least a compromise had been reached, right? Job well done, Mrs. Clinton. Peace is maintained between the US and an influential ally. And now we can all go about our business. Except for one disturbing aspect of the story which cropped up in the following months.
From that point on, UBSs engagement with the Clinton familys charitable organization increased. Total donations by UBS to the Clinton Foundation grew from less than $60,000 through 2008 to a cumulative total of about $600,000 by the end of 2014, according the foundation and the bank.
The bank also joined the Clinton Foundation to launch entrepreneurship and inner-city loan programs, through which it lent $32 million.
And.....it paid former president Bill Clinton $1.5 million to participate in a series of question-and-answer sessions with UBS Wealth Management Chief Executive Bob McCann, making UBS his biggest single corporate source of speech income disclosed since he left the White House.
The WSJ is quick to point out that there is no evidence of any link between these events, but at what point does coincidence become too much to ignore? Youre talking about one of the richest, most powerful financial entities on the planet who, up until Clinton took over at state, had given a grand total of $60K to the foundation. (An amount which likely fell well short of how much USB spent on coffee and donuts during the same period.) And then, in a matter of weeks, the cash spigots opened up and increased tenfold over the next six years.
Tens of millions in loans to efforts supported by the foundation were in addition to a direct set of cash deposits into Bill Clintons pocket totally $1.5M not the foundations coffers. And if I remember correctly, Bill and Hill were still filing their taxes jointly at the time, werent they?
The Swiss bank got a truly sweet deal and millions of dollars flowed immediately thereafter into the accounts of both the Clintons and their foundation. So we are asked to accept that there no causal relationship between these two sets of data points.
We cant prove that there is absent some secret recording turning up, but at what point can the media say that this beggars belief and the empress has no clothes?
No action will be taken over the Swiss governments half-a-million-franc donation to the Clinton Foundation, a parliamentary commission has decided.
The donation to the foundation set up by former US President Bill Clinton and his wife, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, was made between 2011 and 2013 but only surfaced in the press last week in 2016.
The money was donated by the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (DEZA), part of the Swiss foreign office, to support a project aimed at reducing infant and maternal mortality in Liberia........(Excerpt) Read more at thelocal.ch ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.