The Only Force That Can Beat Climate Change Is the U.S. Army

Foreign Policy ^ | January 9, 2018 | BY ANATOL LIEVEN

[TADSLOS]

Jodie calls to follow.

“I wanna be a Climate Ranger...”

[M Kehoe]

I didn’t see “climate scientists” in his bona fides.

5.56mm

[blueunicorn6]

“Live a life of lecturing strangers”

[familyop]

Lieven is having difficulty seeing through his European naivete and lack of education on the matter. The U.K. is the only force that can beat climate change. It’s caused by the City of bankers in London, and only they, with their control of all of the wealth of the world and their empire, can solve the problem. If they are unsuccessful, then Europe is clearly at fault.

See? Even a working class U.S. peasant can write that kind of trash to turn Lieven’s nasty, accusatory implications back toward him.

;-)

[Lazamataz]

The Only Force That Can Beat Climate Change Is the U.S. Army

He's right.

If we send in the US Army to round up and imprison global fraudsters, it would do wonders.

[Wuli]

The author comes from the New America Foundation, which is a Soros, Google, Gates ect. funded foundation, so that alone should establish why NOT to listen to him.

And the line he is peddling is one the New America Foundation has been peddling nearly since it’s inception - make “climate change” a “national security” issue.

You can be sure their deep state tentacles are working hard to get as many active senior military folks and active foreign policy folks to internally, in the active military-defense establishment to push this agenda.

Yet, one thing I want to know is among the senior people at the New America Foundation, what is this guy doing at the “Conservative” National Review:

https://www.newamerica.org/our-people/reihan-salam/

[Valpal1]

I want to know how the extent of an unequivocal basic science can be unclear.

People are so illiterate these days, you can convince them of anything by throwing word salads at them

[rlmorel]

"...If we send in the US Army to round up and imprison global fraudsters, it would do wonders..."

I suspect that it isn't the "global fraudsters" this turd wishes to round up and imprison...

[Windflier]

"The precise extent of human-induced climate change is unclear..."

Oh, it's clear alright. There isn't a single shred of evidence that human activity has impacted the earth's climate in any way.

[cgbg]

the basic science is unequivocal

Less than ten words into the article and the author starts spouting raw bulls___t!

Calling it "basic science" and "unequivocal" doesn't make it basic science and unequivocal.

[AndyTheBear]

The precise extent of human-induced climate change is unclear, but the basic science is unequivocal, as is the danger it poses to the United States.

Now wait a minute....if the extent is unclear, how can the danger be un-equivocal?

[old curmudgeon]

One of the marvels of free speech is that we get to see the fools out in the open.

[jonrick46]

Anatol Lieven is in the wrong line of work. He could make far more money writing fiction novels than all the effort he spends trolling for research grant money.