Posted on 12/24/2017 8:18:25 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
As pointed out in an earlier article, this class is quite deficient in anti-air, anti-sub, and anti-ship weaponry.
It does have water cannons and strobe lights, though...so if they have to fight pirates in speedboats armed with nothing but AK-47s, they’re good to go!
All the better for doing donuts in the parking lot.
Forget Adolph-—Bismark would have had a fit—as would any able leader of the German People. Still, for a nation that will not exist why not get rid of her navy to invest in Mosques and pre-nadal hospitals. Start Arabic Language Madrassas—That or learn Russian.
Here’s a ‘high tech’ carrier with a deisel engine and insufficient protection
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3616553/posts
It’s perfect for anti-warfare operations!
A friends much beloved BMW, brand new pulled to the left.
Every time he returned to Knauz it cost a GRAND or more.
Oh! You must have hit something! The tire is damaged$$$, the wheel is out$$$...
One day he was by the house and while looking under the hood I saw tiny bits of overspray???
He insisted that his baby never had so much as a scratch, ever! I don’t believe the engine is in the car when it is painted???
Years later he takes it to Mr BMW, for a few hundred dollars he will examine your BMW, just look no touch.
The minute he sees the car, he tells my friend “I know this car”! You bought it from Knauz on ...
Hans at the dealer liked to try out the new models after work.He hit a curb with this one!!!!
Must have hit it very hard.
Where is that Schettino guy???
I would not bet against that already being out there.
Well at least the didn’t run into anybody.
Immediate Request previously posted...!
;-) Merry Christmas!
“We build them good in Germany, ja Heinie “ -The Enemy Below Curt Jurgens
Little known nugget: The first few US Navy Ticonderoga Class cruisers were found to be very top heavy in high speed maneuvers and unstable. The Navy dumped heavy stuff (lead I think) in the keel to get stability, but made the "too much weight" problem that much worse. So they initiated a program called "Taking Off Tons, Sensibly" or TOTS. Eventually by the time they introduced the Vertical Launching System they had resolved the issue but the first five ships were doomed to never really be all they could be. They've since been decommissioned.
Stuff happens.
The extra room for Muslim quarters made it overweight.
I guess they found it had no resale value.
rwood
Well, the Germans refuse to fight at home or on deployment, so what if this ship cannot either?
You'd think the USN would remember from WWII. Once it became clear that air power was the threat, they started additional secondary AA to the existing destroyers, causing them to be top heavy.
You'll notice that on some, the aft 5" turret had its top cut off, and replaced by water-proofed canvas to reduce the weight.
“Aside from this troubling situation, Germany is going through some major tribulations with its naval arm, including the embarrassing reality that the country currently has no operational submarines.”
They’re too concerned with diversity enforcement to pay for an actual military.
we could just pull a total weight right off the CAD system.
Germans spend 1.2% of their GDP on defense, roughly $40 billion, depending how you count it.
In that same range are Japan (1%), Canada (1%), Netherlands (1.2%) and Spain (1.2%).
None of them do enough to support their own defense, much less contribute to international missions like NATO or SEATO.
It would lean towards Mecca.
My project this winter is a 1/350th ( about a meter long) model of the Bismarck.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.