Posted on 12/15/2017 5:21:57 PM PST by Kaslin
There is something rotten at the Federal Bureau of Investigation. I mean all of this is just absurd. We have two FBI agents texting one another, one of which is having an extramarital affair with the other, cryptically talking about “insurance” against a Trump presidency. That text between these two agents was delivered on August 15, 2016. You also have Andrew Weissmann, Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s top lieutenant, voicing praise for then-acting Attorney General Sally Yates for refusing to enact President Trump’s executive order on immigration, which got her fired. Then, there’s another DOJ official, Bruce Ohr, who was demoted for meeting the authors of the infamous and unverified Trump dossier, Fusion GPS; Ohr’s wife, Nellie, worked for that firm during the 2016 election. If there is nothing rotten at the FBI, then it’s credibility is definitely in question, something that The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board mentioned in their op-ed about this mess. The two FBI agents at the center of the firestorm right now, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page are obviously no longer working with Mueller; Strzok was removed in August, while Page’s assignment with the investigation has already ended and she has been transferred elsewhere. Still, from this past summer to now—and we’re just learning about these 10,000 text messages between the two. The Journal makes it clear that there appears to be mounting evidence of election meddling emanating from the bureau:
“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office—that there’s no way [Trump] gets elected—but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk,” Mr. Strzok wrote Ms. Page in an Aug. 15, 2016 text. He added: “It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”
What “policy” would that be? The “Andy” in question is Andrew McCabe, the deputy FBI director. FBI officials are allowed to have political opinions, but what kind of action were they discussing that would amount to anti-Trump “insurance”?
In another exchange that month, Ms. Page forwarded a Trump-related article and wrote: “Maybe you’re meant to stay where you are because you’re meant to protect the country from that menace.” He thanked her and assured: “Of course I’ll try and approach it that way.” Mr. Strzok, recall, is the man who changed the words “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless” in James Comey’s July 2016 public exoneration of Hillary Clinton’s emails.
The McCabe meeting came on the heels of the FBI’s launch of its counterintelligence probe into Trump-Russia ties. July is also when former British spook Christopher Steele briefed the FBI on his Clinton-financed dossier of salacious allegations against Mr. Trump. The texts explain why Mr. Mueller would remove Mr. Strzok, though a straight shooter wouldn’t typically resist turning those messages over to Congress for as long as Mr. Mueller did.
Meanwhile, we’re learning more about the political motives of Mr. Mueller’s lieutenant, Andrew Weissmann. Judicial Watch last week released an email in which Mr. Weissmann expressed his “awe” and praise for Sally Yates, after the then acting AG and Obama holdover refused to implement Mr. Trump’s travel ban.
This should trouble anyone who cares about the integrity of the Justice Department.
[…]
Public confidence isn’t helped by the continuing Justice and FBI refusal to cooperate with Congress. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who supervises Mr. Mueller, toed the Mueller-FBI line on Wednesday before the House Oversight Committee. He repeated FBI Director Christopher Wray’s preposterous excuse that he can’t answer questions because of an Inspector General probe. And he wouldn’t elaborate on the news that Nellie Ohr, the wife of senior Justice official Bruce Ohr, worked for Fusion GPS, which hired Mr. Steele to gin up his dossier.
The man who should be most disturbed by all this is Mr. Mueller, who wants his evidence and conclusions to be credible with the public. Evidence is building instead that some officials at the FBI—who have worked for him—may have interfered in an American presidential election.
So, again, what’s the insurance policy? Is it the dossier that contains salacious and unverified information about Trump, something that Katie pointed out in her post? Or, as it seems, is it the FBI investigation into Russian interference in July. Did they hope to find actual evidence of collusion to nail Trump if he were to become president? Strzok was an agent with the counter-intelligence wing of the bureau. Whatever the case, it seems that meddling, or at least conversation of such activities, is coming from inside the house, or to be more accurate—inside the J. Edgar Hoover Building and not the Kremlin. Judicial Watch just filed a FOIA lawsuit to obtain all of Peter Strzok’s files relating to his reassignment from the Russia investigation conducted by Robert Mueller.
That was well-said, Chris, but I don’t think it’s the biggest scandal in American history. It is the just the zenith of an older scandal, and that was the usurpation of an ineligible, CIA plant to the presidency nine years ago.
If we don’t put an end to this sedition, there’ll only be a higher price to be paid later.
The current, large crop of seditionists would never have been able to grab hold of the reins of power and so mightily try to keep hold of it, were it not for the confidence they gained through what was done to bring Barry Soetoro to the fore.
If Trump were to go before a joint session of Congress to announce the arrest of a good number of these Deep State traitors, there would be a lot of dead people before he finished speaking. I would only hope they’d be the ones deserving to be so, but I think they’d probably take a number of innocents with them.
It seems like that same effort has gone national, and the characteristics of straight and masculine are now accompanied by white.
At least that is my perception. there is some weird s*** goin’ on.
Well, some of us talks Mercun.
I think that is it very likely we are going to see something along the lines of what you describe in the near future.
These are bad people, and they are not going to go away on their own, and we cannot coexist.
The course is set.
Later
Question for you...
Was it Schumer that threatened
TRUMP early on about the about
The Deep State?
OR was it McCain?
Good perspective and solid analysis, thank you.
I certainly hope so.
This whole thing has been very troubling from the beginning.
As far as I can see with liberals the Agenda is god, and they will do anything for it.
Those moths felt what they thought was the approaching warm light of a coming New World Order, in which THEY would be the elite and be able to rule tyrannically.
They look jealously at families like the Rockefellers, Rothschilds and Windsors and see lots people who aren’t even on lists of the World’s Richest People because their wealth is off those charts. Those own the Federal Reserve and like foreign banks and organizations. Others own extremely advanced technology that they’ve stolen from the public and keep advancing using taxpayer money. Others own Saudi Arabian Oil and the like or run the top echelons of the drug trade.
To them, Trump’s money is not of an also-ran, but of a piker. Unfortunately for them, Trump isn’t as easily bought as the rest of the Bohemian Club dwellers.
God doesn’t print money, but the truly elite do. That makes some people (and moths) abandon God.
These moths believed they already had bought slots for themselves and their families in underground bunkers against any coming, planned cataclysm (just like the hoaxes we’ve seen on a smaller scale—did I say smaller? Think WARS.). They believe themselves beyond just clever. They work a certain magic, just like they believe their Boss (of this World) does.
They’ve chosen sides (hint: it’s not the one where people can call upon the Savior, Lord God). The rest of us, by the billions, these moths don’t give any chance at all, and that’s sooner than later. That sooner is, I believe, relevant to the answer to your question.
They think they’re gonna win, but it’ll be short-lived. The answers are indeed in the Bible. If we can defeat them now, we may buy ourselves a reprieve. A decade or two or three, perhaps.
Do you need motivation to fight against rulers, against the powers, against the world forces of this darkness you can’t see, against the spiritual forces of wickedness?
What is it worth not to have to tell a soldier’s mother that her son died?
The FBI trying to fix an election for a known slithering criminal and against a good and decent man, and then having failed to do so, trying to destroy that innocent and good man who is now POTUS.
Worst thing is that at least 50%of the country has not been exposed to this truth. They walk among us. They have NO CLUE.
that is a bizarre way of phrasing it, since they are both involved in the affair.... it is not a one-way event.
He watches Huckleberry Hound reruns, too; it helps him with his diction.
What frightens more is the thought that x% of that 50% has been exposed to the truth, knows exactly what is going on, and wants it to succeed.
Only thing that seems to matter is that their people are in charge in the end. Whatever it takes to get there is just fine.
I can’t believe I never connected those two horrible occurrences on the calendar.
Maybe a message for others...
President Trump—in consultation with those he truly trusts—should calmly, carefully and meticulously gather all the salient facts, making sure his ducks are in a row—coordinating with his Chief of Staff; the Secretary of Defense; the Joint Chiefs; the Speaker; the Majority Leader; the Republican Governors of the Several States; Congressional leaders; and the Armed Forces of the United States—and, while outlining this criminal conspiracy to the American People in an address to a Joint Session of Congress, he should declare a national emergency, immediately arresting the ringleaders.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.