Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justices take up dispute over wedding cake for gay couple
AP ^ | 12/5/17 | Mark Sherman

Posted on 12/05/2017 2:21:07 AM PST by markomalley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: DoodleDawg

The Supreme Court should have been smart enough to know if they changed the historical, biblical and natural meaning of marriage, they were declaring open season on Christians.


41 posted on 12/05/2017 12:42:35 PM PST by tuffydoodle ("Never underestimate the total depravity of the average human being.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
Ruling for the baker will basically throw out every anti-discrimination law in the country. Will the Supreme Court be willing to do that even if it is the right course?

Breyer is playing the drama queen. The easiest way to resolve this dispute in favor of Phillips without undermining the civil rights laws is to focus on the freedom of speech aspect, rather than the religious freedom aspect. Under the Colorado Court ruling, Phillips is required to affirmatively create an artistic work to celebrate an event which he opposes based upon deeply rooted religious convictions. In other words, the government is forcing Phillips to express himself when he would rather remain silent. This is different from the situation where peopel walk into a bakery and ask for two dozen pre-made cookies or bagels off the shelf, and the owner refuses to serve them because of their race, ethnicity, gender, age, or sexual orientation.

42 posted on 12/05/2017 1:10:16 PM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: lurk; Albion Wilde
Raise your hand if you’re thankful that Gorsuch was just appointed. . . .

Yes, I'm very happy that Gorsuch is on the Court, to replace Scalia. In this case, that probably means four sensible votes: Roberts, Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch. The left has their four: Breyer, Ginsburg, Kagan, and Sotomayor. However, that leaves the swing vote, Kennedy, who has shown himself in the past to be pro-homo.

43 posted on 12/05/2017 1:59:26 PM PST by Charles Henrickson (Social and constitutional conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SecAmndmt

Actually, it is about sexually abusing them for queer pleasure. The queers call little boys twinks and often pass them around. In the “gay” community. They even adopt them for such purposes.


44 posted on 12/06/2017 3:35:02 AM PST by Neoliberalnot (MSM is our greatest threat. Disney, Comcast, Hollywood, NYTimes, WaPo...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot

I believe that. It at least part of the occult movement it is a kind of anti-baptism of children as well.

I would like to know what % of children raised in the homes of Sodomite unions end up themselves as Sodomites. If it is much less than 100%, I would be very surprised.


45 posted on 12/06/2017 6:31:45 AM PST by SecAmndmt (Arm yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson