Skip to comments.
The Moore Affair Is in the Hands of Alabama
American Thinker.com ^
| November 15, 2017
| Jon N. Hall
Posted on 11/15/2017 11:46:42 AM PST by Kaslin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: COBOL2Java
During the Bush eras it was said that anyone who could be remotely considered for federal judge would start having his trash gone through... figuratively and directly. Dems are totalitarian
21
posted on
11/15/2017 12:20:55 PM PST
by
Freee-dame
(Best election ever.)
To: jmaroneps37
The wicked left is getting rather obvious, isn’t it?
22
posted on
11/15/2017 12:28:32 PM PST
by
fwdude
(Why is it that the only positive things to come out of LGBT organizations are their AIDS tests?)
To: dartuser
The age of doing something not authorized by the constitution was ushered in by our last President.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Our last President was not authorized by the Constitution.
Usurpation Day, January 20, 2009, happened with the complete cooperation of both parties.
They want the Constitution changed without the hassle of amending the Constitution.
Confuse people about the clear meaning of a three word phrase and voila, every anchor baby and Winston Churchill is eligible.
The bench was the reason the GOP went along with the fig leaf resolution for McCain that was used by the Democrats as cover for Obama.
Jindal, Rubio, Haley, George P. Bush and Cruz were all up and comers and the future of the party and ineligible.
The truth of the Kenyanesian Usurpation will never see the light of day because both parties cooperated in the violation of the Constitution
23
posted on
11/15/2017 12:31:49 PM PST
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I think the media got hamstrung by the internet’s near-instant declaration of forgery on the yearbook signature.
Now they are giving it some space because they want to let that die down a bit.
If it were real, I would expect the media to double down on defending the yearbook signature.
24
posted on
11/15/2017 12:36:06 PM PST
by
Valpal1
(I am grown weary.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
25
posted on
11/15/2017 12:40:47 PM PST
by
stars & stripes forever
(Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord. Psalm 33:12)
To: Kaslin
The Moore Affair Is in the Hands of Alabama
One of the first sensible observations spoken about the incident.
The whining, and the crying, and the lying and the bullshit were getting lower-lip deep and about to drown all involved.
To: Valpal1
forgery on the yearbook signature Ya know, how in the world does a 40-year old yearbook "signature" prove or disprove anything? It proves exactly NOTHING. Meaningless. It was a not-so-clever Gloria Allred prop.
27
posted on
11/15/2017 12:48:46 PM PST
by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: Valpal1
I think the media got hamstrung by the internets near-instant declaration of forgery on the yearbook signature. Proving that they learned nothing from Rathergate.
28
posted on
11/15/2017 12:49:23 PM PST
by
thulldud
To: Kaslin
God, can’t wait until this election is all over.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Moore has denied knowing this particular accuser, so the signature is intended to show that he is lying.
30
posted on
11/15/2017 1:02:28 PM PST
by
Valpal1
(I am grown weary.)
To: ltc8k6
If you can expel a Senator for 40 year old accusations, then a lot of members of Congress are up for expulsion.
********************************************
Id like to see every last male Congress critter (both Senators & Representatives) have DNA samples taken and run them all against the national criminal databases.
31
posted on
11/15/2017 1:04:41 PM PST
by
House Atreides
(BOYCOTT the NFL, its products and players 100% - PERMANENT)
To: ltc8k6
Many are exposable for very recent acts of various nefarious nature, I must suspect. There must st be a lot of nervous folks in DC (and Hollywood) these days.
32
posted on
11/15/2017 1:05:21 PM PST
by
polymuser
(Enough is enough.)
To: Kaslin
Next week I will make a $100 donation to the Moore campaign. Already made a donation this week.
To: Valpal1
Moore has denied knowing this particular accuser, so the signature is intended to show that he is lying. OK, that makes sense.
34
posted on
11/15/2017 1:52:57 PM PST
by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Having grown up in the state, I would suggest this. Print media is going nowhere. Most papers in the state only publish four times a week now, and only about 20-percent read papers regularly. Time and Newsweek are read by maybe 3-percent of folks.
Skeptical nature within the state is at a all-time high. Mccain is probably disliked by 95-percent of republicans in the state. Mass media has a marginal effect on the general public. Massive change from the 60s and 70s I grew up there.
To: Kaslin; All
All Alabama voters need to know is the following.
Republicans That Bail On Judge Moore Have Remained Silent On Clinton & Biden Sex Abuse
To: House Atreides
Id like to see every last male Congress critter (both Senators & Representatives) have DNA samples taken and run them all against the national criminal databases. I'd like to make this a constitutional amendment.
37
posted on
11/15/2017 3:10:01 PM PST
by
Valpal1
(I am grown weary.)
To: ltc8k6
>>If you can expel a Senator for 40 year old accusations, then a lot of members of Congress are up for expulsion.<<
Not meaning to boast, but I made this same observation a week ago, noting that there would be a mass exodus from Capitol Hill if such accusations were given the same credibility as this “trumped-up” nonsense against the Judge.
To: House Atreides
>>Id like to see every last male Congress critter (both Senators & Representatives) have DNA samples taken and run them all against the national criminal databases.<<
And after that’s finished, do the same with all male Hollywood critters, and then do the same with everyone connected with the NFL.
To: Kaslin
Here's an excerpt from Rush Limbaugh's Radio Show:
The Swamp Demands Conformity
Nov 15, 2017
...
RUSH: Heres Mark in Port Townsend wheres Port Townsend ?
Port Townsend what?
CALLER: Thats a little bit west of Seattle.
RUSH: In Washington.
Okay. Great to have you with us.
How you doing, sir ?
CALLER: Im doing great, sir.
I hope youre doing well yourself.
RUSH: I am under siege today, Mark.
Im under siege.
The Drive-By Media is after me because I dared to point out that Roy Moore used to be a Democrat.
CALLER: Thats why you get paid the big bucks.
Im envious of you.
RUSH: (laughing).
CALLER: So the comment I wanted to make was that as a retired law enforcement officer, Jeff Sessions Im speaking as a retired law enforcement officer
Jeff Sessions says he doesnt see any reason to doubt these girls word.
Well, I see a really good reason.
None of these girls have been put under oath and made a sworn statement under penalty of perjury.
And Gloria Allred should be able to tell you that is the first thing you do when you get a client,
you depose them and you get their statement on the record,
and then you go from there.
And if theyre not willing to make a sworn statement, that sounds really fishy to me.
RUSH: I take it you dont believe the women
or you just dont have enough information yet to make a determination ?
CALLER: You dont have enough information to make a determination,
but speaking as an ex-cop, I find it fishy that nobody has made a sworn statement.
And about that yearbook thing,you know, when I was in uniform at a certain time of year
youd get kids walking up to you all the time wanting you to sign their yearbook.Hey, Officer Mark, sign my yearbook.
And I was only a cop.
Can you imagine how politicians get kids wanting doesnt mean you remember all of them.
RUSH: Hang on.
On the yearbook stuff, folks, for those of you who may not be up to speed on this and I doubt there are very many of you
there are allegations that some of these autographs in yearbooks are forged.
There are conservative blog sites claiming to have evidence by virtue of side-by-side comparison
that somebody other than Judge Moore signed some of these things.
This is the first Ive mentioned that.
Im just reacting to you bringing up the yearbooks.
Youre upset with Jeff Sessions.
Hes the attorney general, and he is going ahead and acknowledging thathe believes witnesses before anybodys been put under oath,
and you think thats a little unprofessional, right ?
CALLER: It sounds to me like hes just trying to tread carefully.
RUSH: Well, look, this is politics.
It has its own court, and its not a court of law.
CALLER: But these girls are making public statements
RUSH: They are women.
They are women.
CALLER: Okay, theyre making public statements impugning somebodys honor.
And somebody with responsibility needs to explain to them,if youre gonna besmirch somebody, you gotta put it on the record.
RUSH: No, you dont.
Only in court.
And this is not in court.
This is in politics.
CALLER: I understand its politics,
but Gloria Allred should know what the law is.
RUSH: Im sure she does.
Thats why shes not in court and is instead on TV.
CALLER: I just want to make that point, Rush.
Thank you.
RUSH: Im glad you called, Mark.
Folks, I have to tell you,Im having a little fun with this.
No, dont misunderstand here,
but hes exactly right, but of course that doesnt theres a whole different inertia and movement now that is taking place in the world of politics,
and there is no room for doubt.
I mean,the guy did it, you dont disbelieve the women.
I mean, thats something you must subscribe to now.The women dont lie,except if youre Juanita Broaddrick,
then of course
thats the point.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: I was having fun with the caller and his obvious consternationby confusing what happens in politics with what happens in the law,which is ironic,
because the laws are written by these people.
But what happens thereapparently the law doesnt matter first and foremost.
Find it funny.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Steve in Rochester, Minnesota.
Great to have you with us, sir.
How are you ?
CALLER: Hey, good.
Thanks, Rush. Dittos.
Ive been listening since 1991.
So I was reading through a Fox News story on the various senators,Republican senators and their comments about this whole situation,
and I read read em one after another; there were many.
And I was thinking as I got most of the way through it,this sounds a lot like your media montages, vis-a-vis gravitas,
that I often hear on your show.
The similarities were striking in what they said.
And it was an observation that led me to think thatthis is really a coordinated attack.
And I think that should be the focus, not the he said, she said,
but the fact thatthis guys being attacked by the establishment, big time.
RUSH: Let me put it to you another way in the form of a question.
Interesting observation, by the way, that you,in reading and listening to all of the different people opposing Judge Moore,
theyre all saying the same thing, is that your point ?
Just like when Cheney was mentioned as the potential vice presidential nominee for George W. Bush,
about 85 media people all said,Thats gravitas.
This is to provide gravitas.
They all had that word.
You think the same things happening here with the response to Judge Moore ?
CALLER: Yes.
Exactly.
RUSH: Okay.
So do you think let me just ask you point-blank
do you think that, whether he did it or not, ,b>hes being railroaded ?
CALLER: Yes.
RUSH: Interesting.
CALLER: Yep. I think this is a coordinated attack,
and what spurred me to think thiswas your comments yesterday about Mitch McConnell attacking Bannons choice.
And I thoughthow else could you do this ?
Here we are a month away from the election.
RUSH: Let me tell you something.
I dont think theres any doubt here.
When Bannon went public and said thatJudge Moore was the first of many candidates theyre gonna support
in order to oust the Republican leadership,
I dont think theres any question here that McConnells reacting to that.
Let me just ask you this.Have any of you ever,
do you ever remember Mitch McConnell or the Republican leadership ever going after a Democrat
the way theyre going after (interruption)
You dont remember.
You dont remember McConnell ever going after a Democrat the way theyre going after
40
posted on
11/15/2017 6:38:00 PM PST
by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson