Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Roy Moore: Alabama Senate candidate denies child sex abuse
bbc ^ | November 9, 2017

Posted on 11/09/2017 12:18:48 PM PST by Red Steel

An Alabama candidate for the US Senate is strongly denying allegations that he sexually abused a 14-year-old girl.

Roy Moore, a Republican firebrand, said claims that he preyed on a teenager while he was a 32-year-old prosecutor were "completely false".

Leigh Corfman and three other women say Mr Moore made sexual advances on them when they were between the ages of 14 and 18, the Washington Post reports.

The top Senate Republican said Mr Moore must step aside if the claims are true.

Mr Moore, who is now 70, said in a statement to the Post: "These allegations are completely false and are a desperate political attack by the National Democrat Party and the Washington Post on this campaign."

The Christian conservative's team said in another statement about the allegations, "this garbage is the very definition of fake news and intentional defamation".

"Judge Roy Moore has endured the most outlandish attacks on any candidate in the modern political arena, but this story in today's Washington Post alleging sexual impropriety takes the cake," its statement added.

(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: al2017; borking; braking; roymoore; smearcampaign; smears; timedsmears; wellsee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-299 next last
To: snarkytart
Luther Strange and McCain are already piling on.

What I want to know is this—when will the Republicans get serious and start using the same tactics against the Dems? Time and time again we hear about the misconduct on their side, yet, other than Breitbart, no one on the right actually in politics ever seeks out this information to use for their own advantage.

21 posted on 11/09/2017 12:30:38 PM PST by binreadin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

I agree...against her and Wapo.


22 posted on 11/09/2017 12:30:50 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Founding Father
He left out that it was also a desperate attempt by the republican party and its senate majority leader to defame him and prevent his election to the senate.

Nope. If they wanted to do that they would have played that hand months ago in the primaries. This is the dems. It is quite a ploy to go after Moore's core strength. If they can get even a chunk of people to believe the ten commandments zealot was a pedophile they will have a chance.

Meanwhile Doug Jones is running a lot of tear-jerker TV ads trying to look like a reasonable conservative that cares about veterans. The dems down here look like RINOs in many other states in that they go to the right at election time. Disgusting.

We will see how many women they come up with this time.

23 posted on 11/09/2017 12:30:58 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Judge Moore: "All these accusations are completely and utterly false!"

Liberal Media: "Can you prove they are false!"

Judge Moore: "Prove they are false? How?!? they're from 38 years ago. And that's not how the system works anyway, the onus is on the accuser to provide any evidence she might have that they are true, not mine to prove they are false.

Washington Post Headline for Tomorrow:

"Moore states he can't prove molestation accusations false, says accuser might have evidence."

24 posted on 11/09/2017 12:31:08 PM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

>> >> Moore needs to file charges.
>> On what grounds?

Libel. Slander. Defamation.


25 posted on 11/09/2017 12:31:43 PM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

He’s not going to a win a defamation case unless the Post knew that the women in this story are conspiring to lie.


26 posted on 11/09/2017 12:31:59 PM PST by WVMnteer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Looks like Roy may have dated young women with the parents approval when he was 30, so they came up with the 14 year old to make the story worse. That way they are claiming it’s 4 women.


27 posted on 11/09/2017 12:32:17 PM PST by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

He’s a public figure. Unless he can prove that the women conspired to lie and the Post knew about it, he’s not going to win.


28 posted on 11/09/2017 12:32:48 PM PST by WVMnteer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain
Libel. Slander. Defamation.

Moore's a public figure. He has to prove malice on the part of either the Post or the accusers. Not easy to do.

29 posted on 11/09/2017 12:33:33 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Sicon

Immediately file defamation suits.


30 posted on 11/09/2017 12:33:39 PM PST by Louis Foxwell (Progressivism is 2 year olds in a poop fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WVMnteer

Agree. Suing is a bad idea. Public figure. Seems desperate.

Just deny and move on.


31 posted on 11/09/2017 12:34:02 PM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

I read the story the older girls claimed he kissed them on dates sanctioned by their mothers. The claim that he made “sexual advances” is not supported.


32 posted on 11/09/2017 12:34:08 PM PST by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

Trump threatened charges against the women and they disappeared.


33 posted on 11/09/2017 12:34:48 PM PST by Louis Foxwell (Progressivism is 2 year olds in a poop fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg; WVMnteer

He’s more of a lawyer than any of us, I’m sure he knows how it works.

But the maliciousness should be obvious. A false accusation of criminal conduct is inherently malicious.


34 posted on 11/09/2017 12:35:19 PM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
This is so orchestrated! They, the Deep State, thinks we are so very stupid.
35 posted on 11/09/2017 12:35:45 PM PST by Chgogal (Sessions recused himself for shaking an Ambassador's hand. Shameful!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

“made sexual advances.” So, he didn’t expose himself, or had sex with them, or rape them or anything like that?

Rediculous...


36 posted on 11/09/2017 12:35:54 PM PST by nikos1121 (Let's get Newt in there to help...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Judge Moore was Chief Justice on the Alabama Supreme Court. There is NFW this is true.

This appears to be a coordinated attack by the media, and uniparty hacks McConnell and even Sen. Shelby.


37 posted on 11/09/2017 12:36:47 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Thanks Ladies, your checks are in the mail. Love, John McCain and his Democrat friends.


38 posted on 11/09/2017 12:36:47 PM PST by Uncle Sam 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

If its really defamation, he should sue.

But a sex abuse charge is virtually impossible to refute...


39 posted on 11/09/2017 12:37:37 PM PST by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Donate to Roy Moore today! Let him see these LIES will not stand!
40 posted on 11/09/2017 12:38:03 PM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-299 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson