Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Major Effort Underway to Repeal California Gas Tax Hike
cbs2la ^

Posted on 10/18/2017 5:45:58 PM PDT by BenLurkin

It’s the second Republican initiative aimed at repealing the tax increase, passed by lawmakers in April to generate $52 billion over 10 years for road and bridge repairs.

The gas hike includes a 20-cent per gallon increase in diesel taxes, a 12-cent per gallon hike in gas taxes and a 5.75 percent increase in diesel sales taxes. Vehicle license fees will be raised an average $38 per vehicle. Drivers will also face a new annual fee to be paid with their vehicle registration, ranging from $25 to $175 depending on the value of their vehicle. The taxes and fees will rise each year with inflation.

...

Republicans view the tax increase as a highly unpopular move that will draw voters from across California to the polls in the midterm election. Democrats plan to aggressively target seven California Republicans who serve in districts that voted Democratic in the presidential election.

One of those Republicans is U.S. Rep. Mimi Walters of Irvine, who added her support to the Cox-funded campaign.

“The liberal legislature needs to stop increasing taxes on hardworking Californians,” Walters said by phone during the news conference. Republican U.S. Rep. Doug LaMalfa also spoke in support of the repeal effort.

(Excerpt) Read more at losangeles.cbslocal.com ...


TOPICS: US: California
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/18/2017 5:45:58 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The taxes and fees will rise each year with inflation.

That should read:

"The taxes and fees will rise each year as long as Democrats are in control".

It's never enough, plus they're raising all the bridge tolls. Despite all the incoming money, they fail to adequately take care of the roads - because they divert the money to fund liberal causes! Including taking away vehicle lanes and replacing them with seldom used bicycle and walking paths. It's no longer about taking money from car drivers to help car traffic, they'll take car money for non-car use! That includes walking paths, bus systems and ferry boats - and administrator pensions.

2 posted on 10/18/2017 6:03:50 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The problem is nobody will vote for an increase in the excise tax applied at refineries. This is by far the most efficient point of collection, costing less than 1 cent on the dollar (9/10 to be exact) to collect.

By comparison, other taxes such as VMT cost as much as 25 cents of every dollar at the government end and more costs to the private sector.

If nobody in Congress is willing to raise the excise tax, then states have to resort to other means to fix roads that are getting old. Much of the opposition to the excise tax increase is from the GOP.


3 posted on 10/18/2017 6:05:22 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom

Take the money from the High Speed Rail, defund Calaid for Illegals, etc. and there will be plenty of money for roads.


4 posted on 10/18/2017 6:14:05 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (Start using cash and checks or the elite class and bankers will make "cashless" the norm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: roadcat

Not only that but earmarked increases never seem to completely make it to their designated target.

It’s a bait and switch, just like 80% of the lottery profits were to go to education.

Well, at least they’re paying their lottery wins still, for now.


5 posted on 10/18/2017 6:15:23 PM PDT by Fhios (Down with your fascism, up with our fascism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RetiredTexasVet

That is an argument over where funds are allocated. I’m with you on that. Unfortunately, your elected reps in California, both GOP and Dem, have not been willing to change that.

The GOP representatives that complain the most about the diversion of funds consistently vote in favor of continuing the diversion. It is NOT EVEN split votes. And I am not talking about the Legislature. That is Dem controlled.

At the local and regional level where transportation voices can be raised, GOPers and Dems alike are silent and voting yes to things like High Speed Rail and against anything that would stop diversion of transportation funds.


6 posted on 10/18/2017 6:30:28 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
First of there would be plenty of cash for the roads if democrats hadn't been pilfering it and shifting it into the general fund in a ponzi scheme, and demonrat shitzeneggar was a major player, to pretend they have their insane spending in control.

A tiny if any part of these taxpayer rape dollars will go to highways and roads, the demonrats will use almost all of it to fund their social programs, subsidise illegals and ridiculous boondoggles.

The only thing that will save California is if demonrat politicians suddenly and constantly suffer sudden rapid fatal diseases.

7 posted on 10/18/2017 6:33:43 PM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Wait a minute, I thought all of those electric vehicles would save California. Why would they need all of that gas in the first place?


8 posted on 10/18/2017 7:17:58 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom
taxes such as VMT cost as much as 25 cents of every dollar at the government end

Government is mostly a jobs program for Democrats. The only efficiency they want is buying the cheapest voter.

9 posted on 10/18/2017 8:39:44 PM PDT by Reeses (A journey of a thousand miles begins with a government pat down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The pointed attack on diesel is sure to make everything cost more for Kalifornians - I guess they figure more taxes on others will make up for the shortfall to the already poor and allow them to keep “free” stuff “free” for the non-productive as the produces get it in the @$$...


10 posted on 10/19/2017 3:27:11 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredTexasVet

>>Take the money from the High Speed Rail, defund Calaid for Illegals, etc. and there will be plenty of money for roads.<<

Californians were ALREADY paying gasoline taxes specifically for roads and infrastructure.

The legislature just flat-out STOLE those funds and have come begging. Watch — in 5 years they will ask again.

Frankly I think it is funny (I mean as schadenfreude) that liberal California passed the most regressive tax imaginable.

If I was still living there I would wince but it would not interfere with our lifestyle.

But for poor schlubs barely able to come up with the 45% or whatever of their take-home pay for rent and driving from Apple Valley to Montebello, this will be the difference between eating and starving.


11 posted on 10/29/2017 2:05:52 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Every Californian who supported "sanctuary state" has blood and ashes on his/her hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson