Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Blocks Enforcement Of Right To Work In West Virginia; Supreme Court Thrashes Her Ruling
Forbes ^ | September 18, 2017 | George Leef

Posted on 09/28/2017 9:13:11 AM PDT by reaganaut1

Last year, West Virginia became the 26th state to enact Right to Work legislation. The bill was enacted over the veto of then-governor Earl Ray Tomblin, as I discussed in this piece.

Organized labor almost invariably launches desperate legal challenges when states enact RTW and West Virginia was no different. The state’s AFL-CIO looked around for a friendly circuit judge and found one in Kanawha County’s Jennifer Bailey. The argument they presented was that the RTW law would do them “irreparable harm” and should be stayed pending a challenge to its constitutionality.

The unions argued that the law is unconstitutional because 1) it takes the property of labor unions without just compensation – a Fifth Amendment violation; 2) because it interferes with their First Amendment right of association; and 3) because it takes away liberty from union officials.

Even though similar arguments have been tried and found unpersuasive by many courts in the past, Judge Bailey entered an injunction against enforcement of the law, stating that an injunction was warranted because she found it “likely” that the AFL-CIO would ultimately prevail with their claims. Judge Bailey’s order was promptly appealed.

In Morrisey v. West Virginia AFL-CIO, the state’s Supreme Court reversed her order in a forceful opinion by Justice Ketchum.

On the First Amendment claim, Justice Ketchum wrote that while there is no doubt that union workers enjoy constitutionally protected rights of assembly and association, “We see nothing in Senate Bill 1 (the RTW statute) that prevents a person from making a voluntary choice to associate with a union or pay union dues.”

Exactly right – the First Amendment protects Americans against governmental coercion that interferes with their rights.

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; US: West Virginia
KEYWORDS: righttowork; unions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 09/28/2017 9:13:11 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Forcing people to be in a union and forcibly taking money from their pay to go to the union is wrong, unconstitutional, and illegal even if there are laws that allow it - those laws are invalid.


2 posted on 09/28/2017 9:14:49 AM PDT by I want the USA back (*slam is a political movement that hides behind the illusion of religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Today, unions are evil.

Especially public unions.


3 posted on 09/28/2017 9:15:15 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

I know in the early days they needed the muscle, but sleeping with the Mafia rarely turns out well.

Believe me.


4 posted on 09/28/2017 9:19:28 AM PDT by dp0622 (The Left should know that if Trump is kicked ouokt of office, it is WAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Take a look:

She’s #2 following some turd with three chins!

http://www.courtswv.gov/public-resources/press/circuitJudgesMasterList.html


5 posted on 09/28/2017 9:19:49 AM PDT by vette6387 (LOCK HER UP! COMEY TOO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
The unions argued that the law is unconstitutional because 1) it takes the property of labor unions without just compensation

Pretty foul, making the claim that union dues yet to be paid are already yours.

6 posted on 09/28/2017 9:21:59 AM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

More proof (as if any more was needed) that the judiciary has been poisoned with lawyers who think that leftwing dogma trumps duly enacted legislation.


7 posted on 09/28/2017 9:23:41 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

It was especially interesting to note the union’s argument that this law would harm them by “taking” their property without compensation-by which they meant, dues money that they haven’t yet collected (or forced) from employees. That’s the mindset of the left in a nutshell, no private property, it all belongs to them.


8 posted on 09/28/2017 9:24:48 AM PDT by mrsmel (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

Hey.....us persons of three chinedness resent that.


9 posted on 09/28/2017 9:25:30 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“Hey.....us persons of three chinedness resent that.”

Sorry, I am also appalled at the phalanx of fat nurses I see on my visits to the doctor too.


10 posted on 09/28/2017 9:27:26 AM PDT by vette6387 (LOCK HER UP! COMEY TOO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
In Morrisey v. West Virginia

That would be Patrick Morrisey, our Attorney General who is now running for US Senate.

11 posted on 09/28/2017 9:30:43 AM PDT by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

More activists judges. Thankful we have the votes on the Supreme court to override this horrible activist who wants the people of the United States to be controlled.

We must ensure we keep our freedom despite these activist judges trying to take our freedoms away from us and force collectivism upon us.

JoMa


12 posted on 09/28/2017 9:40:59 AM PDT by joma89
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

What property was taken from the unions with RTW? Do they consider the person their property or just all their money?

Apparently, in their sick minds, unions have rights but individuals don’t.

I really hate communists.


13 posted on 09/28/2017 9:41:24 AM PDT by No Socialist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy
Maybe the property is the worker, it I thought the thirteenth amendment already covered that.

The unions argued that the law is unconstitutional because 1) it takes the property of labor unions without just compensation – a Fifth Amendment violation; 2) because it interferes with their First Amendment right of association; and 3) because it takes away liberty from union officials.

It's interesting that they said that without the slightest hint of irony. Those same three arguments could be used to argue much more strongly why forced unionization should be illegal everywhere. It takes away the workers' property. It interferes with the workers' rights to freely not associate with the union. And it takes away liberty from the workers.

14 posted on 09/28/2017 9:53:31 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (The Whig Party died when it fled the great fight of its century. Ditto for the Republicans now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All

Black robed, lawless creatures, fight proper law. Thank you SCOTUS for correcting this creature. It would be better if there were jail for judges like this.


15 posted on 09/28/2017 10:08:30 AM PDT by veracious (UN = OIC = Islam ; Democrats may change USAgov completely, just amend USConstitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

Michigan SOS union employees are particularly vile pieces of excrement......!


16 posted on 09/28/2017 10:09:21 AM PDT by Trevieze (Messy desk is a sign of a messy mind. An empty desk is a sign of an empty mind!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Wow, Mennis Ketchum is on this court. He built a nice home less than a block away from where I went to high school.


17 posted on 09/28/2017 10:15:51 AM PDT by TheStickman (#MAGA all day every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

RTW law would do them “irreparable harm”


Automobiles did irreparable harm to the buggy-whip industry.
Should fed gov have intervened?

Or even better, repealing Prohibition did irreparable harm to makers of grape bricks used to make home made wine. Should Prohibition have been reinstated?


18 posted on 09/28/2017 10:16:03 AM PDT by sparklite2 (I'm less interested in the rights I have than the liberties I can take.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
I know I'm a teen, but what property? If the property is the employee's money that he is robbed for paying off the union, it isn't the UNION'S money.

Make Right to Work a law across the USA. No union dues.

19 posted on 09/28/2017 11:11:43 AM PDT by ConservaTeen (Islam is Not the Religion of Peace, but The religion of Pedophilia...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I’ve learned through multiple incidents to NEVER trust a woman named “Jennifer”. Bad news all the way.


20 posted on 09/28/2017 12:06:07 PM PDT by Buckeye Battle Cry (Beer! Because you can't drink bacon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson