Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Confederate monument stands on Chicago's South Side as questions swirl around the country
Chicago Tribune ^ | 8-16-17 | Nereida Moreno•

Posted on 08/17/2017 7:11:51 PM PDT by SJackson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: Timpanagos1

Books? People who destroy monuments and statues that are historical would never destroy or edit a book or document? What if a law was passed to the effect that owning a book considered politically incorrect is hate speech, therefor a crime?

Very little history is taught in school now, what passes for history now is more discussion about feelings, what was right and wrong- mostly wrong about our past from the liberal view of course- anything else is already politically incorrect.

Of course we can always teach our own children history without monuments or books...unless what we teach them can be termed racist, sexist, ETC. which can be classified as hate speech and that can be a problem if some get their way.

So without monuments (that can provide a teaching moment when a child asks about them) without real history books, if we are not allowed to teach our knowledge of history to our own children, then how long will it be before they will be ignorant of all history except what is considered politically correct history?

If the Confederate flag is not allowed, and statues depicting Confederate soldiers are not allowed, do you think photographs of those things will be considered okay? Why? What about documents about it? Papers and pictures are more easily destroyed than statues. Most people in this country under the age of 50 have a poor understanding of history already, it would not take many changes for them to be completely ignorant other than what liberals want them to believe.

If you think this is all about the Confederacy and slavery or even blacks and whites I have a bridge to sell you. This is about all the issues liberals and conservatives differ on. Do you think they would stop with this issue if successful? I think they would move on to another issue, then another...


21 posted on 08/17/2017 10:50:00 PM PDT by Tammy8 (Please be a regular supporter of Free Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

The Reverend Dukes sounds very wise.


22 posted on 08/18/2017 1:37:41 AM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia (Democrats: The perfect party for the helpless and stupid, and those who would rule over them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timpanagos1

Democrat party constructs ALL


23 posted on 08/19/2017 5:33:36 AM PDT by Phil DiBasquette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson