Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US could wipe out North Korea in 15 minutes, says Gen. Tom McInerney
WFLD-TV ^ | August 9, 2017 | Fox News

Posted on 08/09/2017 5:48:27 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-151 last
To: Huaynero

I tried watching a Filipino soap opera once. I thought it got a little over the top when one girlfriend tried to put a poisonous snake in the bedroom of another rival girlfriend to get rid of her. . . .


141 posted on 08/10/2017 12:19:35 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Gideon300
Think through what I wrote, and then, think through what you wrote.

HOW MANY "NK and Chinese ground troops" are going to be left alive AFTER the initial ICBMs Strike ?
Have you heard of MIRV ?
Watch this video of old photos and pay special attention of the Multiple warheads reentering the atmosphere at Kwajalein from 0:51 seconds until 0:58 seconds (from just one missile) ... and again at 2:21 until 2:28 (from just one missile) . REALLY, HOW MANY of their troops will be left alive ?
Now again I emphasize that this MUST BE A PLANNED, PREEMPTIVE STRIKE, timed out to the very second that each piece of the "tool" we use, will strike the ground.
And don't forget about our tactical nukes that can be carried under the wings of many different aircraft like the F-16s and F-15s at Osan and Kunsan.
Then there's the fighter aircraft we have on aircraft carriers in the Sea of Japan, and at out military bases all over Japan.

What about our nuclear powered submarines that carry MIRVs ?
The time from launch of those weapons until the time they strike North Korea could be extremely short.

Think through what I wrote, and then, ,,, think through what you wrote.
What you don't understand is that ...
It's time to END THIS PROBLEM ! ! !
142 posted on 08/10/2017 1:51:55 PM PDT by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Manly Warrior; Wildbill22

Nukes, even airbursts, create fallout.
And not all the nukes would be airbursts; the Norks have some of the deepest bunkers in the world. When Saddam Hussein was building his command bunker, he consulted with the Norks.
So how do you think all the nations downwind from North Korea are going to respond? How will the South Koreans feel about us nuking their relatives? And do we really want a United Korea sharing a border with the PRC?


143 posted on 08/10/2017 2:51:24 PM PDT by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Hugh the Scot

You didn’t read my comments: “We have perfected solid fuel boosters” Obviously, we aren’t using liquid fuel because of that.

Any NK silo would be ground zero, no hardening would protect it. So any silo hardening would be a waste of time, hence, only purpose would be all-weather.


144 posted on 08/10/2017 3:12:53 PM PDT by gandalftb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Justa

NK has only achieved 2 orbital launches that burned up oh re-entry, we have the video.

NK is not into failure, if they had adequate heat shielding they would use it. If it worked they could always signal a self-destruct on re-entry.

They would learn more that way, which is what they want.


145 posted on 08/10/2017 3:16:56 PM PDT by gandalftb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

Unfortunately, I did read your comments. Russian and Chinese solid booster stages are available to North Korea. Also consider that the weight of solid-fueled rockets do not lend them to a mobile basing scheme...
Another strong recommendation for silo launch. It’s far more likely that TEL development is the limiting factor, not booster design.


146 posted on 08/10/2017 3:54:49 PM PDT by Hugh the Scot ("The days of being a keyboard commando are over. It's time to get some bloody knuckles." -Drew68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

I’ve never been to Korea. My military experience is limited to Southeast Asia 1967-71, so I will defer to your knowledge of NK and their military might, or lack thereof.

Before I post anything, I usually try to think it through to the best of my knowledge and not make snap statements. Of course I’ve heard of MIRV, as has most everyone else. My whole point all along has been that the first person, NK, US, Fubaristan, whomever, who is willing to set off the third nuclear explosion in anger in the history of the world will be opening a Pandora’s Box, and letting the Genie out of the bottle, neither of which can be undone. This act will unleash a worldwide hell that we cannot imagine, and the blood of untold millions will be on the hands of that first nuclear aggressor. Is NK worth it?

I agree diplomacy has failed miserably, and there comes a time when it’s time to “end this crap”. This may be the time. But this may not be the method.


147 posted on 08/10/2017 4:23:18 PM PDT by Gideon300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: kaehurowing

I tried watching a Filipino soap opera once. I thought it got a little over the top when one girlfriend tried to put a poisonous snake in the bedroom of another rival girlfriend to get rid of her. . .
______________________________________________________

I spent a fair amount of time in the Philippines, and I remember one case where someone put a cobra in a container, left it in someone else’s house...all for that very purpose. So it’s not really so farfetched.


148 posted on 08/10/2017 4:32:03 PM PDT by Gideon300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Gideon300
It's going to happen sooner, or later.
The longer we wait, the worse it will be for everyone.
It's better to GET IT OVER WITH NOW, for everyone concerned.

Read your Bible, and pray for the best.
God taught His people to fight for a reason, and to stand for your principles.
149 posted on 08/10/2017 4:48:44 PM PDT by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Hugh the Scot

Well, you were at least fortunate enough to read my comments and change the subject :):).

No dispute about the availability of Russian and Chinese missile technology, although there is strong evidence that they have obtained more help from the Iranians, particularly on solid fuel.

Yes, Tel development is limiting, so is the condition of NK roads, few are all weather. Any road improvements for TEL use would be quickly spotted.


150 posted on 08/10/2017 7:25:18 PM PDT by gandalftb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

Do you want a raggedly wobbly low yield off target thermo nuke to impact, say, on/near Guam or Juneau or Denver or Phoenix or anywhere on US territory? If it comes across as a threat weapon profile, we will shoot it down. The crazies will call our intercept an act of war ( even though the missile is a weapon of MD by all sane minds) One or 13 thermos nukes in the hands of DPRK is too many. Hang on!

The rest of the world will never believe the ballistic data anyway- our allies and friends will understand an attack on one is an attack on all. NK would not likely rely on one missile with a real or no payload at all to tweak Guam as a show of a red ass to the US- they know its all or none.

Do they think we will let them launch a potential nuclear weapon into US territory? Do you?


151 posted on 08/11/2017 7:54:42 PM PDT by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-151 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson