After a snowball earth?
Nope, Global Warming scientists will predict that, after it happens, too.
Posted on 08/04/2017 2:46:24 PM PDT by Openurmind
The Paris Climate Agreement of 2016, which saw 195 nations come together in the shared goal of ameliorating climate change, set forth an ambitious goal of limiting global temperature rise to less than 2 degrees Celsius. Since then, many have wondered, is that even scientifically possible? Unfortunately, the odds aren't looking good.
(Excerpt) Read more at sciencedaily.com ...
“Unfortunately, the odds aren’t looking good.”
If the new Ice Age comes soon, then it’s all cool.
The ice age is coming, the sun is zooming in
Meltdown expected, the wheat is growin’ thin
Engines stop running, but I have no fear
‘Cause London is drowning, and I, I live by the river…
The assumption is that the present temperature of the earth is the “perfect” temperature. How stupid is that?? There’s no such thing.
It’s really funny that these people think they can control the temperature of the planet.
Who has the Sun switch?
Wonder how long it will take for them to finally breakdown and admit that when it happens?
“... The assumption is that the present temperature of the earth is the “perfect” temperature ...”
-
And another assumption is that anyone can accurately determine
what the “temperature of the earth” actually is at any point in time.
(what is it right now; and how is that determined?)
Who knows? Lunatics often are completely unpredictable . I laugh at their insipient flaccid ideas.
You are absolutely right. They really are not sure what the temperature actually is. It is an ?educated? guess.
Human beings, and in fact, all God’s creatures on this good green earth have proven to be remarkably adaptable organisms, for the most part. Little things like minute changes in the composition of earth’s atmosphere, or an insignificant shift in the latent heat of the entire planet, do not lead to mass extinctions or serious die-backs of existing populations. And because of the really massive number of factors involved, that odds that mankind could (or should) make a measurable effect on the whole ecosystem of the planet are about as significant as that of a specific anthill somehow being able to be granted the same power.
All the other anthills did not get a vote?
It’s after the US quit financing the foolishness.
An amusing form of “sour grapes”:
Since there is no longer any money to be had, then best find a reason to give up.
Fear not, you socialist fraud. You will be wrong.
Are we all clear that the "Paris Accord" has nothing to do with "the weather" and everything to do with Global Totalitarian Government?
This study is worthless. The say it is "data driven," but it relies on the assumption that CO2 levels are the key driver of global temperatures, still an unproven hypothesis. But, since global temps have been flat the last 15 years, while CO2 concentrations have dramatically increased, the actual, real world, evidence suggests CO2 is not the driver the alarmists and their computer models claim.
After a snowball earth?
Nope, Global Warming scientists will predict that, after it happens, too.
The war on nature continues. Liberals think they can change the weather as well as turn men into women.
It isn’t possible to get a new ice age until the one we are still in finishes.
It will still be “Global Warming caused this too”. :)
Very well said, We are pretty insignificant in the whole of things.
[ The assumption is that the present temperature of the earth is the “perfect” temperature. How stupid is that?? There’s no such thing. ]
Blatantly ripped off quote from the libtard favorite economic big government zero just to poke the gore-bull-ists in the eye.
” In the end, it is Heat Death for the entire universe “ ~ John Meynard Keynes
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.