Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AP sources: Trump speaks to advisers about firing Sessions
AP News "sources" ^ | July 25, 2017 | JONATHAN LEMIRE and JILL COLVIN

Posted on 07/25/2017 2:31:22 AM PDT by McGruff

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump has spoken with advisers about firing Attorney General Jeff Sessions, as he continues to rage against Sessions’ decision to recuse himself from all matters related to the Russia investigation.

The president’s anger again bubbled into public view Monday as he referred to Sessions in a tweet as “beleaguered.” Privately, Trump has speculated aloud to allies in recent days about the potential consequences of firing Sessions, according to three people who have recently spoken to the president. They demanded anonymity to discuss private conversations.

Trump often talks about making staff changes without following through, so those who have spoken with the president cautioned that a change may not be imminent or happen at all. What is clear is that Trump remains furious that the attorney general recused himself from the investigations.

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: RummyChick

Laurence Tribe? Why should we believe him? :-)

I think DJT is tweeting about Jeff for the media’s consumption.

FWIW, I think I just heard on ABC (I am stuck somewhere where it is on) that Sessions offered to resign and Trump said he would not accept the resignation.


41 posted on 07/25/2017 4:12:15 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

Rachael brand has been confirmed by senate

Trump is bullying Sessions to quit. Install Brand. Fire mueller

What he is doing to Sessions hacks me off. The guy was loyal to him in public when no one wanted to touch him.


42 posted on 07/25/2017 4:14:37 AM PDT by RummyChick (can we switch Don,Jr for Prince Kush and his flak jacket. From Yacht Party to Warzone ready to wear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

Cankles or not at least she had some bigger gonads than church mouse Sessions.


43 posted on 07/25/2017 4:15:44 AM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Because it makes sense. Surely a persons name doesnt get in the way of your reasoning and logic

Brand has already be approved by senate


44 posted on 07/25/2017 4:16:23 AM PDT by RummyChick (can we switch Don,Jr for Prince Kush and his flak jacket. From Yacht Party to Warzone ready to wear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: LS

With a lot of the recent rumblings about Sessions, what are your thoughts?


45 posted on 07/25/2017 4:20:13 AM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phoneman08

Indeed.


46 posted on 07/25/2017 4:21:36 AM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sphinx
I honestly don't know how much of DoJ is subjected to confirmation. US attorneys, Head and Deputy at DOJ, FBI Director (not Trump's guy yet). What are the others subject to confirmation? i don;t know, have to do some research.

Ok, research done. I see Associate AG, and 12 Assistant AG's, head of BATF, head of US Marshal, Solicitor General, and a few others. See CRS RL30959 - Presidential Appointee Positions Requiring Senate Confirmation

I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that you haven't actually looked at the various places nominations are listed.

Senate Exec calendar - Out of committee, in Senate
Us Senate - Civilian Nominations - On Calendar (should be same as above)
US Senate - Civilian Nominations - In Committee

The president also "previews" some nominations via what is referred to as a formal "intention to nominate." Those are listed at the WH, but not in any "current" summary form that I am aware of.

47 posted on 07/25/2017 4:27:43 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Lawrence Tribe is a far left wing loon lawyer that Al Gore used to try to steal the election in 2000.

He is liar and con man not a source for any facts .


48 posted on 07/25/2017 4:28:23 AM PDT by ncalburt (ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Lawrence Tribe is a dem party hack that Al Gore used to steal the 2000 election.

When do these Communist lawyers ever shut up and retire.

Tribe is the last person on earth to believe . .

49 posted on 07/25/2017 4:30:52 AM PDT by ncalburt (ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt

Explain to me why it is not logical that Brand will replace sessions with the expectation that mueller will be fired

How does that not make sense


50 posted on 07/25/2017 4:34:15 AM PDT by RummyChick (can we switch Don,Jr for Prince Kush and his flak jacket. From Yacht Party to Warzone ready to wear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Un-recuse himself! Problem solved! Then go after Illary, dammit!


51 posted on 07/25/2017 4:36:56 AM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

I was commenting on that con man Tribe , a Marxist Left wing lawyer who is clueless and won’t shut and retire.
Have no idea about that person .


52 posted on 07/25/2017 4:40:56 AM PDT by ncalburt (ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Yes, well, we know the left all agrees that recusing was the correct move.

It wasn’t legally right. You don’t have to legally recuse yourself from a manufactured scandal. And, I’m not a lawyer but I don’t think you’re under any legal obligation to recuse yourself from anything. If that were the case then Kagan would have recused herself from the Obamacare case. It’s more an ethical thing, and there’s nothing unethical about not recusing yourself from a fake scandal.


53 posted on 07/25/2017 4:41:53 AM PDT by MountainWalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: major-pelham

Yes, MAGA is better than Sessions — if we have to choose. But I’ve been thinking that Sessions could get away with confessing error and un-recusing himself if he plans it well and does his talking points right. Am I too optimistic?


54 posted on 07/25/2017 4:42:47 AM PDT by Socon-Econ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Could this all be theater? It is certainly keeping Hillary crimes in the news where before they had faded from print. Mentioned enough even slower Americans will begin to see.


55 posted on 07/25/2017 4:44:11 AM PDT by nclaurel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

DAG was nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate before he was sworn in.


56 posted on 07/25/2017 4:47:26 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

And then he continues running the DOJ with this hoax in the rearview mirror.

Look, I’m inclined to think Sessions should resign, but it just sucks that the media would claim another scalp over this fabrication. And, I’m worried Trump won’t get the replacement that he wants.


57 posted on 07/25/2017 4:47:54 AM PDT by MountainWalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: MountainWalker
-- You don't have to legally recuse yourself from a manufactured scandal. --

There are two ways to look at that.

If there is no case, then of course there is no recusal. Recusal proceeeds on a case-by-case analysis. If "the case" is a piece of hallucinated fiction, there is no case, and any recusal is in effect, meaningless. Just for example, session has to recuse from a case where his wife is charged with a federal civil rights crime.

But make no question, Sessions has to recuse from a case that involves his wife. He also has to recuse from a case that involves the Trump campaign.

58 posted on 07/25/2017 4:49:13 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: MountainWalker

So let me get this straight. You are claiming that a republican that was a federal prosecutor..that people here want as AG is now a lefty and is wrong about sessions


59 posted on 07/25/2017 4:51:15 AM PDT by RummyChick (can we switch Don,Jr for Prince Kush and his flak jacket. From Yacht Party to Warzone ready to wear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604
Sessions was confirmed February 8.
Deputy AG Rosenstein was confirmed April 25.
Associate AG Brand was confirmed May 28.

FBI Director Wray has not been confirmed, but likely will be, this week.

60 posted on 07/25/2017 4:52:22 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson