Posted on 07/06/2017 3:23:55 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
“I’m no military expert, I just don’t see any upside to taking action or NOT taking action against NK.”
Well, you can always shoot down the next missile that is launched, saying the missile was armed. Tell them that for any subsequent launches, we now have to assume they are arming missiles and not only will we shoot the next one down, but in retaliation we will launch one of our own.
Tough to respond to that. If Kim says there was no warhead, then he loses face in front of the world. Which means his next launch he will definitely arm a missile.
Question becomes, if Trump says this to Kim, will Trump keep his word? I wouldn’t bet against him.
While many like to play up Gen Mattis as a war-monger, he is an incredibly well-read individual. He is a strategist AND a warrior.
So, for a moment, imagine the NK Leader eating with his generals. One of them drops dead. A few moments later, another one drops dead. Rinse and repeat over a week. Then, Kim Jong-un wakes from a bad night's sleep to this...
This is almost no different from the military head games Reagan ran around the Soviets in the early 1980s. It was brutally effective, without a shot being fired.
Yea, we will still get rhetoric from NK and his people remain under tyranny, but there will be NO more missle tests and NK is now neutralized.
I think THIS is more plausible that nukes.
Fatboy should go to sleep to find a hand grenade under his pillow with a note that says “Please be reasonable, first warning”
Tell that to Alaska.
And according to some experts, he can EMP our entire country and deliver the nerve gas to us at any port as well.
You and Neville would have gotten along well - ya think?
It will be good for LA or Alaska to know as they are dying enmasse that we will retaliate.
I read this over and over again...."But but but - he knows we will retaliate"
Read the definition of psychopath.
so what are you proposing then hero? A preemptive nuclear strike? or will another preemptive conventional war be sufficient? just like it was in Iraq. Some of us have been living with the threat of mutually assured destruction longer than others so we aren’t exactly terrified. Me personally, I just want to see this all turned into increased arms sales to our allies in the region. I am not losing a second of sleep over the “NK threat”.
Her confidence in our choice to choose our own path was quite obvious.
You don't think this little POS Chia Head has not mentioned taking it out?
That’s exactly what I think too.. but the aftermath is what concerns me. Best case scenario Berlin Wall.. the Norks get freedom.. but I was in West Germany when the wall came down. It was very difficult for the West German economy to absorb the East Germans.
Worst case scenario.. people who are controlled in every decision and live a life unimaginable to us cannot assimilate easily.
I think it will be political suicide if trump takes out Kim n co.. everything we have gained will be flushed. 2018 would be a return of the Dems.. is it worth it?
I still think the UN arranged all of this to get their money back. We are being played by world globalist.
what are you, a a scared little child? I have been living under the policy of mutually assured destruction for nearly five decades. and I’m still alive and well and completely unafraid.
The point is moot if he has enough nuke-tipped missiles. Then we are into MAD. He will have the power to take us out anytime he wants. They win, we lose.
Killing Kim J would only start the war, not prevent it.
There is no good answer. The best would be for China to handle it, but again, that would start the war, not prevent it.
If I lived in Seoul, I would be looking to leave for a bit.
Pretty amusing.
One of the quotes I posted here the other day was about a warning that 50 plus planes were headed to Hawaii at 180 mph per radar. And the LT. said it was nothing, to just ignore it as I recall.
It's not like our CIA hasn't been far more proactive in the past. We shall see.
Attacking China would be even more foolish than attacking the U.S.
China wouldn’t be phased one bit losing a few million people overrunning NK.
The videos are there on you tube. I do understand this is not the view of most people. But I stand proudly with it nonetheless. They actually laugh at times as the dog screams in pain.
Not an enhancement for the planet. They can go.
This book I highly recommend to you.
Seems like it all worked out pretty well for us in the end, didn’t it?
When people make certain statements and their acts conform to those statements I tend to take them at their word. ― Mark Steyn, America Alone: The End of the World As We Know It
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.