Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court agrees to hear baker's appeal
Twitter ^ | June 26, 2017 | NBC News

Posted on 06/26/2017 6:46:06 AM PDT by Trump20162020

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: TexasFreeper2009
An Islamic magazine should be required to run ads promoting Christianity
21 posted on 06/26/2017 7:18:38 AM PDT by KSCITYBOY (The media is corrupt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Not good considering the Arkansas decision.

How is it not good? If the Supreme Court refused, the baker would have automatically lost (the baker lost in lower courts).

22 posted on 06/26/2017 7:18:49 AM PDT by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Edward.Fish

{We Reserve The Right to Refuse Service To Anyone}

That died in 1964 when the Civil Rights Act was passed. And that is why some conservatives opposed the Civil Rights Act.

“More specifically, Goldwater had problems with title II and title VII of the 1964 bill. He felt that constitutionally the federal government had no legal right to interfere in who people hired, fired; or to whom they sold their products, goods and services. He felt that “power” laid in the various states, and with the people.”

https://freedomsjournalinstitute.org/uncategorized/urban-legend-goldwater-against-civil-rights/


23 posted on 06/26/2017 7:22:30 AM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

I have said from the beginning, that if a Christian baker can be forced to bake a sodomite cake.

Then a black magazine should be required to run ads for the KKK.


That is a great analogy. I had one like it, but have long since forgotten it. Getting old sucks.

I would like to use that quote.


24 posted on 06/26/2017 7:22:59 AM PDT by Wildbill22 ( They have us surrounded again, the poor bastards- Gen Creighton William Abramsp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: Trump20162020

This years term ends this week. Are they already announcing what they will hear come October?


26 posted on 06/26/2017 7:24:26 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KSCITYBOY

An Islamic magazine should be required to run ads promoting Christianity


Another great analogy.
I like it!

Thanks!


27 posted on 06/26/2017 7:24:44 AM PDT by Wildbill22 ( They have us surrounded again, the poor bastards- Gen Creighton William Abramsp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: laplata

There seems to be an illusion that a seller is obligated to sell to any customer, while the customer is free to buy or not to buy, and to choose whom to buy from.

Yet, when you see a transaction for what it is - a trade between two equal individuals, exchanging something of value for something of value - it becomes apparent that both parties have the right to choose whether or not to enter into the bargain.

I sure hope the Supreme Court gets this right, for it is the very heart of free enterprise.


28 posted on 06/26/2017 7:24:58 AM PDT by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
Then a black magazine should be required to run ads for the KKK.

The Klan is not a protected class.

29 posted on 06/26/2017 7:25:53 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wildbill22

I don’t understand how the SC can possibly force anyone to do anything against their beliefs and individual rights.

That just seems primary to the 1st A.


30 posted on 06/26/2017 7:26:44 AM PDT by Wildbill22 ( They have us surrounded again, the poor bastards- Gen Creighton William Abramsp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Verbosus

Yes, it’s Colorado.

Weird, as I know someone said Mississippi on TV.


31 posted on 06/26/2017 7:27:33 AM PDT by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Then a black magazine should be required to run ads for the KKK.
The Klan is not a protected class.


True.

The whole concept of a ‘protected class’ needs to be defined or rejected by the SC, and this case may do just that.


32 posted on 06/26/2017 7:28:22 AM PDT by Wildbill22 ( They have us surrounded again, the poor bastards- Gen Creighton William Abramsp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: enumerated
while the customer is free to buy or not to buy, and to choose whom to buy from

Oh government is doing a good job of putting paid to that element of economic freedom as well.

33 posted on 06/26/2017 7:28:24 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
Whatever happened to,”No shoes, no shirt, no service?”

I wish we could go back to that. Require that if a business wants to be selective as to clientele then they have to post a sign saying "We don't serve gays" or "We don't serve Muslims" or whatever group they don't want to deal with. Then let the market sort it out.

34 posted on 06/26/2017 7:28:35 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: Wildbill22
The whole concept of a ‘protected class’ needs to be defined or rejected by the SC, and this case may do just that.

We'll see. When religious freedom collides with the right not to be discriminated against then religious freedom has been losing. Maybe this will reverse it.

36 posted on 06/26/2017 7:30:29 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Or a Jewish print shop being required to produce flyers for Nazi’s.

This MUST be framed in terms of free speech and coerced speech. This IS discrimination - but against an EVENT not the PERSON. Between forced servitude and coerced speech this is requiring you to put your labor toward an EVENT with which you have a conscientious objection to. It is part of being able to live according to your beliefs.

If a baker won’t sell a ready-made cake on the shelf to somebody because they’re gay that is one thing, it is entirely another when you’re requiring somebody to enter into a contract to create something for an event they don’t agree with. This is NOT discrimination against a person but an event.

Unless this perspective is argued, that it is more of a free speech issue than religious freedom, the point is lost. The argument will otherwise be that religious beliefs don’t trump discriminating against a person. That is not the point.


37 posted on 06/26/2017 7:34:08 AM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing consequences of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wildbill22

Yes, there should be no ‘protected class’. Equal before the law is the only protection that counts, & is no longer the rule in our courts.


38 posted on 06/26/2017 7:35:43 AM PDT by Twotone (Truth is hate to those who hate truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg; TexasFreeper2009
The Klan is not a protected class.

And a "magazine" is not a "public accommodation" within the meaning of Title II of the Civil Rights Act.

39 posted on 06/26/2017 7:38:32 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Not good considering the Arkansas decision.

Gorsuch will be included in this panel. If Kennedy retires, all the better.

40 posted on 06/26/2017 7:44:33 AM PDT by fwdude (Democrats have not been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson