Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Adds 4 States To Travel Ban For Laws It Says Discriminate Against LGBTQ Community
CNN ^ | 06/23/17 | Carma Hassan

Posted on 06/25/2017 7:05:03 AM PDT by Enlightened1

alifornia has issued a ban on state-funded and state-sponsored travel to four more states that it says have laws discriminating against LGBTQ people.

The travel ban was first put into effect January 1 when state measure AB 1887 became law. The law says California is "a leader in protecting civil rights and preventing discrimination" and should not support or finance "discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people."
The travel ban list also includes states that California believes don't protect religious freedoms and states that it says use religious freedom as a basis of discrimination.
"Our country has made great strides in dismantling prejudicial laws that have deprived too many of our fellow Americans of their precious rights. Sadly, that is not the case in all parts of our nation, even in the 21st century," California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said in a statement Thursday.

Why the ban?

Kansas, Mississippi, North Carolina, and Tennessee were the original states banned by AB 1887, but Becerra added Alabama, Kentucky, South Dakota and Texas on Thursday, citing what he called new discriminatory legislation enacted against the LGBTQ community in those states.
Alabama, South Dakota, and Texas all recently passed legislation that could prevent LGBT parents from adopting or fostering children and Kentucky passed a religious freedom bill that would allow students to exclude LGBTQ classmates from campus groups.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: ban; homosexualagenda; keepowt; searchworks; states; travel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
At the bottom of the article,

"There are exceptions to the ban, however. For example, if travel is required to maintain grant funding or licensure, or for auditing and revenue collection purposes. And of course, anyone can travel to any of the states on the list in a personal capacity. "

1 posted on 06/25/2017 7:05:04 AM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

I think this is unconstitutional. States can’t interfere with interstate commerce.


2 posted on 06/25/2017 7:06:43 AM PDT by CondorFlight (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

States should reciprocate and ban Californians. Arrest their college and professional coaches, and forfeit their games when they come to town.


3 posted on 06/25/2017 7:09:32 AM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
Gee! Wow!

Maybe soon all 57 states will be on the list..... (snicker)

4 posted on 06/25/2017 7:10:59 AM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Response: we all go to these banned states on vacation and avoid Ca and CA businesses. May the queers continue to spread their diseases in CA.


5 posted on 06/25/2017 7:11:05 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

The left loves “travel bans” when it fits their agenda.


6 posted on 06/25/2017 7:11:25 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (Ignorance is reparable, stupid is forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

“And of course, anyone can travel to any of the states on the list in a personal capacity. “

Scary that they would even feel the need state this.


7 posted on 06/25/2017 7:13:56 AM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Queerapornia

So what?


8 posted on 06/25/2017 7:17:07 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huskrrrr

I officially ban any and all californicate citizens, esp my family who lives there, from my property.


9 posted on 06/25/2017 7:17:53 AM PDT by oldasrocks (rump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Huskrrrr

They are trying to avoid getting caught up in civil law suits.

Given the fact that California can’t even control their boarders.

This is more symbolic. Nevertheless, it should be challenged in Court as illegal.


10 posted on 06/25/2017 7:18:34 AM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Reciprocation is the right approach and it should be a coalition of the roughly 35 red states. Banning travel by state employees (including university employees) to California will effectively mean that no academic conferences or national level meetings can be held in California from now on. That would end this fascism from California quickly.

All red states need to act to do this now, regardless of what their individual laws are. If California gets away with this, they will eventually try to dictate policy to all 49 of their neighbors in every area.

Just another way that intolerant liberals are destroying the basic civility and live-and-let-live attitude that had been the strength of this nation since its inception.


11 posted on 06/25/2017 7:19:14 AM PDT by CaptainMorgantown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

If they were serious they would ban air travel to or from any of these states from using any airport that gets any funding from California state funds.


12 posted on 06/25/2017 7:20:49 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

“And of course, anyone can travel to any of the states on the list in a personal capacity. “

It’s ok with me if the State of California should ban Californian’s form traveling to Texas in a personal capacity as well....


13 posted on 06/25/2017 7:21:12 AM PDT by snoringbear (E.oGovernment is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Jokes aside, it’s getting difficult to tell leftist enclaves and Sharia states like Saudi Arabia apart, so merciless is their enforcement of ideology.


14 posted on 06/25/2017 7:23:15 AM PDT by relictele
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

I’m sure the 9th circuit will uphold this travel ban.


15 posted on 06/25/2017 7:23:28 AM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Oh just go all in. Secession! Now!


16 posted on 06/25/2017 7:24:23 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Didnt the nuts do this sometime before?


17 posted on 06/25/2017 7:27:28 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight

Not engaging in commerce among the States though is not interstate commerce.

The Constitution doesn’t grant the federal power to regulate things that affect commerce among the several States but are not interstate commerce themselves: like growing your own feed stock or engaging in commerce within a state.

That the federal does so is an artifact of FDR era lawlessness. High handed lawlessness at that.


18 posted on 06/25/2017 7:31:19 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Huskrrrr

“And of course, anyone can travel to any of the states on the list in a personal capacity. “

For now...


19 posted on 06/25/2017 7:32:53 AM PDT by Noumenon ("Only the dead have seen an end to war.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CaptainMorgantown

Sounds good: let’s bitch-slap California’s sorry ass.


20 posted on 06/25/2017 7:33:06 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson