Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A federal appeals court just upheld a nationwide block on Trump's travel ban
Business Insider ^ | 5/25/17 | Michelle Mark

Posted on 05/25/2017 2:40:30 PM PDT by Cheerio

The 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday largely upheld a nationwide block on President Donald Trump's travel ban, arguing that it "drips with religious intolerance, animus, and discrimination."

The Trump administration will most likely appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: blackroberico; blackrobesvsamerica; courst; judicial; travel; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
Get this up to SCOTUS ASAP.

If this is allowed to stand, we have no nation, and all borders are erased forever. IF SCOTUS upholds then the wack jobs destroying this country will have been 100% successful in absolutely destroyed our Constitution giving rights to every living organism on the planet that they agree with.
1 posted on 05/25/2017 2:40:30 PM PDT by Cheerio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

Either the supremes knock this down or the bloody war begins.


2 posted on 05/25/2017 2:46:25 PM PDT by Bullish (May as well just rename Hollywood---> Hypocrite city)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

Re: ...it drips with religious intolerance...

Sounds like the decision was written by MSNBC.


3 posted on 05/25/2017 2:46:29 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

” drips” eh?
My goodness
Some law clerk had sand in his vagina


4 posted on 05/25/2017 2:46:33 PM PDT by silverleaf (We voted for change, not leftover change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

After more than a century of precedent , suddenly judges can flip on a dime because they don’t like what a President said in a speech somewhere. Who elected these Judges and made them King?


5 posted on 05/25/2017 2:48:32 PM PDT by Nateman (If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

Sessions has just stated the US will appeal to the SCOTUS.

FoxNews reporting...


6 posted on 05/25/2017 2:49:22 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Happy days are here again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

More so-called judges not following the law. When will Congress take a chainsaw to these courts?


7 posted on 05/25/2017 2:49:38 PM PDT by joshua c (Cut the cord! Don't pay for the rope they hang you with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

Send these treasonous, mental giants to Manchester and force them to watch as they gather up body parts, make them look at all those lovely children (and adults) and tell us we don’t need to keep out those who seek to destroy OUR children and grandchildren as well as we adults!!! The blood of any future victims should we have another terrorist attack here is on their hands!!!


8 posted on 05/25/2017 2:49:42 PM PDT by Dawgreg (Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

What Sessions needs to do is ignore these asshole judges.

They do not have any jurisdiction over the matter.


9 posted on 05/25/2017 2:50:19 PM PDT by chris37 (Donald J. Trump, Tom Brady, The Patriots... American Destiny!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: joshua c

That’s what I think too joshua. Give these courts a political enema and the sooner the better!!


10 posted on 05/25/2017 2:51:11 PM PDT by Dawgreg (Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio; All

MORE CRAP from the 9yh Circus.


11 posted on 05/25/2017 2:51:30 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Not the 9th circuit. The federal courts as a whole now stand against the President.


12 posted on 05/25/2017 2:53:01 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

It’s the Fourth Circ, uh, Circuit this time.

But it is indeed crap.

They are relying on statements that have no bearing whatsoever in the case. They look at the statute, the order and the legislative history and that’s about it.

This is judicial activism and clear tyranny.


13 posted on 05/25/2017 2:53:36 PM PDT by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

Since when do judges get to consider “evidence” that is not part of the case? Not a word of the case has to do with campaign speeches and these SOBs are ruling based upon it.


14 posted on 05/25/2017 2:55:45 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio
These pathetic Blackrobes-for-Islamic-terrorism should
remember that what really "drips"
has been the warm blood of freshly-murdered, helpless
innocents; most lately the children of Great Britain.


15 posted on 05/25/2017 2:57:54 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LostInBayport

I have other bad words to descibe it.


16 posted on 05/25/2017 2:57:58 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

“The exclusion of aliens is a fundamental act of sovereignty … inherent in the executive power,” the Supreme Court said in 1950. And lest there be doubt, Congress adopted a provision in 1952 saying the president “may by proclamation and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens and any class of aliens as immigrants or non-immigrants” whenever he thinks it “would be detrimental to the interests of the United States.”

Another federal lower court running amok, heedless of law.


17 posted on 05/25/2017 3:04:19 PM PDT by tumblindice ("Fight for your country." Hector)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris37

Chris, while I’d like to agree with you, I can’t.

Bad judicial verdicts have to be appealed. We can’t just ignore them.

If we ignore them, we go over the line breaking the law. Then there is a charge to be made that is valid whether we like it or not.

If Trump is in violation of the law, he’s breaking the law. We support law and order.

Congress is where relief on this needs to come from if the SCOTUS declines to provide it.

Would I love to see Trump tell these judges where to go? Sure I would. Then I have to calm down and look at it in legal terms.

I don’t think the SCOTUS or the courts have the right to stop Trump from doing anything that is legal for him to do, or is proper for the president to do.

The SCOTUS and other courts have overstepped their mandate. Congress should slap that down.

Once again, here is another think the Congress is failing to do with it’s new found majority and with a Republican president in office.


18 posted on 05/25/2017 3:04:42 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Happy days are here again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

How exaclty does an “inferior court” created by and subordinate to “Congress” even claim to have “Constitutional Authority” over a Branch of Government that is Separate but Equal to the very branch that “ordained and established “ the “inferior court”????


19 posted on 05/25/2017 3:07:03 PM PDT by eyeamok (destruction of government records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

By the time this gets to SCOTUS how many will be let into the country??? I don’t want this crap to become the “new normal” for our grandchildren. Please, Jeff Sessions make this happen yesterday at the earliest.


20 posted on 05/25/2017 3:09:23 PM PDT by azishot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson