To: dfwgator
Why not decide the winner with a series of penalty goal kicks? Oh, that’s right. They already do in REAL football.
5 posted on
05/23/2017 11:40:08 AM PDT by
beelzepug
(Anybody I attack may rest assured it's personal!)
To: beelzepug
Real football? Is that the one with the guys in short, laying on the ground crying?
*watched no NFL last season due to Kraptastic
8 posted on
05/23/2017 11:45:14 AM PDT by
mykroar
(Congratulations President Trump)
To: beelzepug
What would be even better:
One quarterback, 1 center, 4 wide receivers vs 1 nose tackle, 1 linebacker and 4 defensive backs
Each team lines up at the 10 yard line and gets one play to get it in the end zone.
Keep going until someone scores.
10 posted on
05/23/2017 11:49:28 AM PDT by
Bratch
("The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke)
To: beelzepug
Why not decide the winner with a series of penalty goal kicks? Oh, that’s right. They already do in REAL football.
Which "real" football do you mean? Wikipedia has:
Association football/soccer
Australian rules football
Gaelic football
American football
Canadian football
Rugby football
20 posted on
05/23/2017 11:57:48 AM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics.)
To: beelzepug
No white person in the Western Hemisphere cares about soccer.
To: beelzepug
Okay, but the place kicker only gets to kick once.
-PJ
47 posted on
05/23/2017 12:50:07 PM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
To: beelzepug
Why not decide the winner with a series of penalty goal kicks? Oh, that’s right. They already do in REAL football. There's nothing more exciting than a kicking contest at the end of 93.2 minutes of 0-0 play.
117 posted on
05/24/2017 10:16:08 AM PDT by
Mr.Unique
(The government, by its very nature, cannot give except what it first takes.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson