Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US approves $650M for San Francisco Bay Area train system
Ft. Worth Star-Telegram (AP) ^ | May 22, 2017 | JULIET WILLIAMS

Posted on 05/22/2017 2:51:08 PM PDT by Drago

SAN FRANCISCO - The Trump administration announced Monday that it will fully fund a $650 million federal grant for electrification of a San Francisco Bay Area train system that also would help California's high-speed rail project.

(Excerpt) Read more at star-telegram.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: caltrain; chao; hsr; mcconnell; obamarail
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Brian Griffin

“I think California should just use overnight sleeper train service between LA and SF.”

They should use buses. Faster and more reliable.

There are two ways by rail, SF-LA
One is by the coast. That’s a slow, rough route, lots of curves and tunnels, very scenic (the Amtrak Coast Starlight is the service on it) but because of the nature of the track and sharing with freight trains, the schedule is extremely variable. Its a nice train for riding, but not a good train to depend on.

The other is the San Joaquin Limited, runs through the Valley to Bakersfield, reliably. But no further. From there to LA its a bus.


21 posted on 05/22/2017 3:31:44 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Despot of the Delta

That was February, this is now...$650 million in federal funds now approved under Chao (Mitch McConnell).


22 posted on 05/22/2017 3:32:11 PM PDT by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: buwaya

Sleeper bus: http://www.autoblog.com/2016/05/09/sleepbus-la-sf-overnight-official/


23 posted on 05/22/2017 3:33:18 PM PDT by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Drago
More $$ wasted on "the train to nowhere" project. Mr. Trump, if you ever hope to balance a budget this is a great place to start, very disappointing.

Absolutely disappointing. Gov. Jerry Moonbeam Brown was blasting the Feds a couple months ago, saying California could go its own way and not rely on Federal money. Brown even said California could build its own satellites. Well, they can't build their own trains. After blasting Wash DC and President Trump, Gov Brown went begging for $650 million for the train project. President Trump should have tied it to ending sanctuary status for illegals.

Truth is, the electrification of the trains was unnecessary. CalTrain was already operating highly efficient hybrid trains that use electric motors, the electrical power provided by onboard diesel engines. In other words, the train was already an electric train. The real story is that Brown's high-speed train wants to share the same rail right-of-way as the CalTrain line, so Brown saw the electrification project as a way to achieve his high-speed project. All the money is going into creating rail infrastructure to handle the high-speed trains.

A huge waste of money all around, done with lies by Gov Brown.

24 posted on 05/22/2017 3:39:41 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drago

Different train project. The “high speed” project is the train to nowhere one.


25 posted on 05/22/2017 3:42:56 PM PDT by semaj (Audentes fortuna juvat: Fortune favors the bold. Be Bold FRiends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roadcat

Yep, the “high speed” train was dead as soon as the HS Rail Authority bowed to wealthy Palo Alto/San Bruno, etc. residents and “blended” the system with existing CalTrain tracks...will never achieve Prop 1(A) speed or “time to L.A.” requirements. Illegal for the Prop. 1(A) funding to be used since they can’t meet the requirements.


26 posted on 05/22/2017 3:46:27 PM PDT by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GOPe Means Bend Over Spell Run
Make the ticket price cover it or stop the train!

The fare box has never covered the true costs of the train. Highly subsidized, as is most public transportation; usually the fare box covers 1/3rd of true costs. I've ridden this CalTrans train, very nice. The way it was, was nice. The millions and now billions thrown at it lately were unnecessary. All done just for the high-speed pipe dream of Gov Brown. Most of the money spent has to do with altering the corridor to accommodate the high-speed trains simultaneously with CalTrain between Bay Area destinations. They're lowering streets, or building overhead rail, and building stations where none existed. It's a mess, mostly for the high-speed rail which will forever be heavily subsidized.

27 posted on 05/22/2017 3:48:42 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: semaj
Different train project. The “high speed” project is the train to nowhere one.

The "high speed" train to nowhere was "blended" with CalTrain long ago...wealthy Palo Alto/San Bruno, etc. residents objected to new HSR tracks and noise from high speed trains. HSR will run on CalTrain tracks (60-70 mph speed limits) and use the electric centenaries this wasteful funding builds (on the peninsula). Let the Bay Area finance it!

28 posted on 05/22/2017 3:53:21 PM PDT by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“Does anybody ride trains anymore”
I would if I felt safe doing it. The stations in Cleveland and Akron give me the creeps! I’d love to take a NICE train trip to visit my Sister in Chicago (actually Palatine) but everything about Amtrack has fallen apart! I remember, as a kid, taking the train to visit my Grandparents who were vaxationing at the Wigwam in Arizona. Observation cars! Clean! Great service. I was a little boy traveling on my own, and the conductors and all the other service people took great care of me! A golden age,,,,,GONE! Too bad, as it was a great way to travel and see the sights along the way.


29 posted on 05/22/2017 3:54:10 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra (Don't touch that thing Don't let anybody touch that thing!I'm a Doctor and I won't touch that thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Drago
Bay Area Rapid Transit: BART
Bay Area Train System: BATS
Phoenix Area Rapid Transit:      PHART

30 posted on 05/22/2017 3:59:45 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Everywhere is freaks and hairies Dykes and fairies Tell me where is sanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buwaya
Runs from Gilroy to San Francisco.

So gay people can pick up their garlic.

31 posted on 05/22/2017 4:01:10 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Everywhere is freaks and hairies Dykes and fairies Tell me where is sanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: Drago; All
Thank you for referencing that article Drago. Please note that the following critique is directed at Trump and not at you.

Noting that I voted for Trump and do not regret doing so, please consider the following.

Regardless of Trump’s good intentions for the country, as a consequence of constitutionally low-information Trump surrounding himself with advisors who probably don’t know the fed’s constitutionally limited powers any better than he does, Trump is still unsurprisingly clueless that the feds have no constitutional authority to tax and spend for infrastructure like train systems. This is evidenced by the following clarifications of Congress’s limited power to tax and spend by previous generations of state sovereignty-respecting Supreme Court justices.

In fact, and with all due respect to the family, friends and supporters of the late President Eisenhower, Eisenhower was likewise clueless that the states have never expressionally constitutionally delegated to the feds the specific power to establish a national highway system.

This is evidenced by the following excerpt from the writings of President Thomas Jefferson, Jefferson indicating that the states would first have to expressly constitutionally delegate to the feds the specific power to regulate, tax and spend for a national highway — something that the states have never done.

"On a few articles of more general and necessary use, the suppression in due season will doubtless be right, but the great mass of the articles on which impost is paid is foreign luxuries, purchased by those only who are rich enough to afford themselves the use of them. Their patriotism would certainly prefer its continuance and application to the great purposes of the public education, roads, rivers, canals, and such other objects of public improvement as it may be thought proper to add to the constitutional enumeration of federal powers [emphases added]”—Thomas Jefferson : Sixth Annual Message to Congress

In fact, President James Madison later vetoed the public works bill of 1817, complementing Jefferson’s words by pointing out that, regardless of politically correct (my term) interpretations of the Common Defense and General Welfare Clause (1.8.1), other than the post roads clause (1.8.7), there are no clauses in Congress’s constitutional Article I Section 8-limited powers that gave Congress the specific power to tax and spend to build roads and canals.

Veto of federal public works bill

In other words, Eisnhower needed to first successfully petition the states for a national interstate highway amendment to the Constitutional before building one imo.

So at this point in time, misguided Trump is inadvertently helping to unconstitutionally expand the already unconstitutionally big federal government’s powers like Eisenhower did imo.

Roy Riegels wrong way run in the Rose Bowl

33 posted on 05/22/2017 4:13:44 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Outlet malls plus more-affordable housing for South Bay workers.


34 posted on 05/22/2017 4:22:03 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Drago

Actually it’s a different train, the commuter train between SF and San Jose. It’s a line that’s actually full a lot of the time. Of course the diesels work fine. But Trump shares the liberal love of trains.


35 posted on 05/22/2017 4:28:55 PM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drago

Not a good move on multiple levels.


36 posted on 05/22/2017 5:16:37 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drago

Willie Green would approve.


37 posted on 05/22/2017 5:18:30 PM PDT by DFG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drago

What deal did Trump exact in return? Inquiring minds want to know.


38 posted on 05/22/2017 5:24:33 PM PDT by Albion Wilde ("We will be one people, under one God, saluting one American flag." --Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drago

Why would Trump’s administration approve a dollar for SF? Tell their judges to fund the project.


39 posted on 05/22/2017 5:36:00 PM PDT by Uncle Sam 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

And the stupidity just never ends. Maybe this is fake news.

Never the less - the time of man is running out.


40 posted on 05/22/2017 5:50:43 PM PDT by TheTimeOfMan (A time for peace and a time for war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson