Hillary: The Girl Can’t Take It

American Thinker.com ^ | May 7, 2017 | Clarice Feldman

[Kaslin]

The Hillary Clinton whinefest continues. I had hoped that like the falling out of favor Kardashians and Caitlyn (aka Bruce) Jenner, she’d just start fading out of an audience, but she feels compelled to keep complaining about all those who cost her the election. This week she blamed James Comey and “Russian” hackers for her loss.

There are two parts to the Russian collusion claim by the Hillaryites. They contend, first, that there was some still unspecified evidence to support a Russian preference for Trump. Then they claim that it was Russians who hacked her email accounts. This week both of those claims proved to be without substance.

In Congressional testimony, the only basis for the first assumption was the purely factually unsupported, speculative belief by FBI director Comey that Russia preferred Trump. The only basis for the second was that the FBI was examining contacts between Trump and the Russians -- a suggestion Comey swatted off. Paul Sperry writes in the New York Post:

[joshua c]

An excerpt from Shattered caught my eye.

Robb Mook stopped doing internal polling out of concern for costs.

$1.2 billion and that is what he cuts?

PA We did not hear too much about too much money in campaigns this election.

[DPMD]

In 40 years, we’ll be seeing ads for “Fast and Furious meets Rocky 62,” and news of clinton’s latest presidential bid.

[HokieMom]

James Antle in the Washington Examiner:
Hillary Clinton imagines an alternate universe in which she is president

[zeestephen]

The attempt to label Hillary Clinton as a “loser” is very puzzling to me.

Obviously, she lost the Electoral College.

But she got just 62,000 fewer votes than Obama got in 2012.

And, in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, just the votes from the Green Party would have given her a majority in each state and won her the election.

[Pagey]

Great Post!

[CedarDave]

Not mine; it’s copied from one by Pollster1.