Posted on 04/20/2017 12:31:49 PM PDT by TBP
How thirsty does Variety look begging readers to join it in doing high V cheerleading moves for Chelsea Clinton?
Thirstier than an ultra-marathoner lost in Death Valley in mid-July.
Hyping the entertainment magazine's latest cover, Co-Editor-in-Chief Claudia Eller gushed this week, "How cool does Chelsea Clinton look on our Power of Women, NY, cover?"
Welcome to the liberal media's manufacturing of "cool." Leather jacket? Check. Overzealous airbrushing? Check. Humanizing grin? Check. Democratic establishment pedigree? Checkity-check-check.
This is just the latest attempt by The Media Resistance to make Chelsea Clinton a thing. The same liberal lunatics in the press who rage about the Trump children's nepotistic privileges champion the "refreshingly outspoken" daughter of the Clinton dynasty who, at 37 years old, will receive a "Lifetime Impact" award from Variety on Friday for her "humanitarian work."
The honor comes during the same week that the Clinton Global Initiative cash machine officially shut down. Among the generous "humanitarian" projects of CGI's parent, the Clinton Foundation: chipping in a reported $3 million for Chelsea's wedding to another heir of Democratic corruptocrats, Marc Mezvinsky the newly jobless former hedge fund manager and son of convicted fraudster Edward Mezvinsky, a former Democratic congressman from Iowa.
Remember: The Clintons' own inner circle lambasted Chelsea's hubby for exploiting the Clinton Foundation and CGI to prop up his now-defunct hedge fund. The duo also siphoned off charitable donations to pay for "taxes on money from her parents" and expenses racked up to subsidize her "life for a decade," according to longtime Clinton aide Doug Band.
But I digress from the Cult of Chelsea Coolness. Shake those pompoms, propaganda media:
The New York Times lauded "Chelsea Clinton, Unbound," applauded her "confrontational tweeting" against President Trump and interviewed her about books for a series featuring successful authors after her most recent ghostwritten opus on global health care flopped like those famous Filipino divers on YouTube.
BuzzFeed and The Hill cover Chelsea as if she were a Kardashian. Politico also cooed over Chelsea's new "spicy, sarcastic online personality" on Twitter. Then the Beltway publication hailed her upcoming children's book, which opportunistically cribs left-wing feminist Sen. Elizabeth Warrens cri de coeur, "She Persisted."
The Huffington Post breathlessly reported on Chelsea's brave thoughts about breast-feeding and menstruation. She boldly asserted in a wellness article that we all need to "support" breast-feeding women and menstruating girls "by talking candidly" about them. OK then. Prepare the Nobel Prize nomination, stat!
Insipid platitudes deserve eye rolls, not gala celebrations. What independent "power of women" has Chelsea Clinton exercised, other than inheriting her father's name and whats left of her two-time-losing mother's political cachet?
"Lifetime achievement"? She skated through college and pulled family strings to secure her short-lived, high-priced jobs in management consulting and media.
Those who know Chelsea Clinton best see her for what she is: a "spoiled brat," to quote Doug Band.
She is Bill Clinton without the charm, Hillary Clinton without the ruthlessness and full Billary in her bottomless well of inflated entitlement and ideological hackery.
The ineluctable drive to prop up Chelsea Clinton is textbook fake news. The only constituency rooting for her to run for political office is the Hollywood-media complex, which is desperately trying to squeeze blood from a rotten turnip.
How uncool is that?
As I recall, the headline when that picture came out was “Chelsea Rocks Leather Pants!!!!”; which is a great example of the over-the-top cheer leading Malkin is talking about.
Please have a heart. I’d rather be waterboarded than see that cover again? Have you no mercy?
The woman in the second photo is actually attractive. I’d ask her out if I was still in that age group.
Yes, she’s actually cute, in a pathological ax-murderer sort of way....................
REAL
See post 13 by Huntress.
Then do a Google search "chelsea rocks leather pants"
In all fairness I must caution you - do not do the search if you have a weak stomach.
The Whale Family, Momma Cow And Baby Calf
She is still a knockout!!!
Yes, she is.
I think the first one I posted was too large. But good.
That’s not nice to compare a braying donkey to the beautiful young woman with the perfect teeth in photo #2.
I’d ask her out even if I’m not.
My Lord,does she own a mirror?
After the last election, you’d think that the left would get the message that we’re utterly sick of these people. What the hell has Chelsea ever accomplished in her life? Graduated from no-show college? Getting no-show jobs? I still hear my dad’s words, “Something given to you has no value.” It’s my contention that Chelsea’s entire life is worthless. She needs to just take her trust fund and her rich husband into the sunset, she’s just making an ass of herself every time she opens her bleating pie-hole to the media.
Oh my lord, she looks like a deranged 50 year old that took one too many happy pills and decided to dress sassy.
That’s the first picture I’ve ever seen of Chelsea where I see a resemblance to Bill Clinton, in the mouth, the way the smile is angled. After the presumption over so many years that Webb Hubbell might be or is her father, here-finally I do see Bill Clinton for the first time-in her smile.
Photoshopped. Hips pared down a lot.
Arms lengthened
Just for starters
They just pasted her plate-like face on an entirely different body.
LOL!......................
Despite trying to improve her appearance, she is a dead ringer double of Howdy Doody. She probably doesn’t know exactly who that grinning puppet is - but her parents and the rest of us do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.