Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republican Wins Congressional Seat in Kansas, 53-45%
cnsnews.com ^ | 4/12/2017 | ROXANA HEGEMAN

Posted on 04/12/2017 8:34:43 AM PDT by rktman

Republicans pulled out a victory in Kansas in the first of four U.S. House special elections to replace GOP congressmen named to top jobs in President Donald Trump's administration, but the next contest for a seat in Georgia could be tougher to hold.

The margin of victory Tuesday for Kansas Republican Ron Estes in the 4th District special election slid to only seven percentage points from a 31-point margin in November, when incumbent Mike Pompeo was running before he was appointed Trump's CIA director.

In a further warning sign for Republicans, Estes narrowly lost the district's most populous county around the city of Wichita to his Democratic opponent James Thompson, a political newcomer. Trump won that county by 18 points.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Kansas
KEYWORDS: ks2017; politics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: DoodleDawg

The most obvious reason for the fall off would be the circular firing squad antics of the House Republicans over the Federal Health Care farce. Hopefully the boys and girls will get the message.


21 posted on 04/12/2017 9:10:50 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Even Democrats in red state Kansas suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome. They were highly energized by hate and put forth an all out effort to win this special election.

Instead, they still came up 8% short.

James Thompson, the Democrat in this race, has already announced he's running against Estes in Nov 2018. IF IF IF, Trump and the GOP Congress does its job, Thompson will get spanked by at least 25 points.
22 posted on 04/12/2017 9:11:55 AM PDT by Dan in Wichita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ohioan
The most obvious reason for the fall off would be the circular firing squad antics of the House Republicans over the Federal Health Care farce. Hopefully the boys and girls will get the message.

A far greater concern, at least where this district is concerned, is Trump's proposed 21% cut in the Ag Department budget. That would basically eliminate all discretionary spending and do away with a lot of programs the farmers in this district depend on. Add Trumpcare to that and 2018 could be interesting.

23 posted on 04/12/2017 9:16:33 AM PDT by DoodleDawg (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rktman

My take away from this is that the rats ‘nationalized’ this election...by pouring in out of state resources. This usually happens with endangered seats, where he rats think thy have a shot at winning.

To see them dabble with this safe seat election indicates, to me at least, that the mid-terms will feature a Tsunami of party funds.

And I don’t know what to do...I don’t particularly trust the RNC enough to give them money right now...but I’m sure the rats will be well funded.


24 posted on 04/12/2017 9:34:57 AM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
Considering that in November Pompeo racked up a 31 point win then this is eking.

And, Dems barely put a candidate with a pulse against Pompeo and spent no money trying to win the seat in 2016.

25 posted on 04/12/2017 9:41:06 AM PDT by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Demoncrats are saying they consider the “narrow” difference in votes to be a win for them. I hope they keep “winning” that way.


26 posted on 04/12/2017 9:41:47 AM PDT by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lady Heron
Now take an honest look at the liberal direction of Trump in the last few weeks

What liberal direction? He continues to negotiate a health care deal with the Freedom Caucus, deportations for illegals are way up and he refused to sign the Paris Climate Change deal. And, Gorsuch was confirmed to the Supreme Court.

If there is a problem it is with House leadership, especially the refusal to providing funding for a border wall.

27 posted on 04/12/2017 9:46:37 AM PDT by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

The liberal has raised $9,000,000 mostly from NY and Kalifornia. The Democraps will be out in force, and the Conservatives and Republicans (not necessarily the same thing) had better trundle their asses to the polling place if they want to stop him.


28 posted on 04/12/2017 9:54:57 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kazan
And, Dems barely put a candidate with a pulse against Pompeo and spent no money trying to win the seat in 2016.

Thompson was hardly better known than Giroux was and the Democrats spent about the same amount of money in 2016 as they did in this special.

29 posted on 04/12/2017 10:06:19 AM PDT by DoodleDawg (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
Democratic Voters Pour Cash Into Kansas Special Election

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/james-thompson-kansas-election_us_58ea3423e4b05413bfe38f8b

30 posted on 04/12/2017 10:17:58 AM PDT by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: rktman
No need to sweat this out in that race.

Libs trumped lots of big abortion, gun cintrol, gay lobby money to beat a guy who could best be described as an engineer, accountant or bank teller (no intent to besmirch anyone in these fields, just trying to describe Ron Estes to you.)

Libs tried pulling a charm offensive, lying about all their guy's intention, especially in Wichita, which could be described as pretty strong minority community (poor blacks & Latinos, both legal & illegal) who will vote as their liberal handlers tell them to vote.

Libs might try a do over in 2018 but no conservative in KS is interested in leaving this seat to shysters and carpetbagger anti-Trumpster, Clinton land!

31 posted on 04/12/2017 10:22:21 AM PDT by zerosix ( Native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan
Democratic Voters Pour Cash Into Kansas Special Election

Yep, they poured a little less than $300 thousand into it...and were outspent by the Republican by a factor of over 4 to 3. What's your point?

32 posted on 04/12/2017 10:32:47 AM PDT by DoodleDawg (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Galactic Overlord-In-Chief; BillyBoy; ...

Romney also won this district by a wide margin, 15 points. This was an underperformace but not earth-shattering.


33 posted on 04/12/2017 12:26:51 PM PDT by Impy (End the kritarchy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Impy

It’s hilarious the rodents think all the races will be this close in 2018. Estes will likely perform at GOP standard next year.


34 posted on 04/12/2017 12:53:02 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Je Suis Pepe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

That money was raised and spent on a special election that last weeks. That is little different that raising and spending money in an regular election that last months.


35 posted on 04/12/2017 12:53:11 PM PDT by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Kazan
That money was raised and spent on a special election that last weeks. That is little different that raising and spending money in an regular election that last months.

And that would mean that the Republicans still poured more money into the election than the Democrats did.

36 posted on 04/12/2017 2:08:37 PM PDT by DoodleDawg (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; Impy
It’s hilarious the rodents think all the races will be this close in 2018. Estes will likely perform at GOP standard next year.

Incumbency alone is going to make such a swing in many seats highly unlikely.

A concerning result, but can't be separated from local factors like Brownback's unpopularity, plus I've read Estes was a less than inspiring candidate.
37 posted on 04/12/2017 5:23:09 PM PDT by Galactic Overlord-In-Chief (Domo Arigato, Mr. Rubio. Domo Arigato, Mr. Rubio.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Galactic Overlord-In-Chief; Impy; AuH2ORepublican; BillyBoy

True, those are likely the two reasons for Estes’ subpar performance. Estes was also chosen at a convention, as opposed to a primary, and those candidates have often proven to be somewhat poor in special elections (witness NY state after Zero’s election). I was surprised to see ex-Congressman Todd Tiahrt, who badly wanted his old seat back, placed 3rd at the convention. Presumably, he might’ve performed far better as a well-known name in that district.

There is well-founded concern that the Dems might take the KS Governorship in 2018 because of one simple fact (excluding the unpopularity of Brownback), not since 1964 has either party had a successor elected from the same party (when Republican Bill Avery succeeded fellow Republican John Anderson, Jr.). Beginning with the defeat of Avery in 1966, it could be counted on to swing back and forth like clockwork.

Popular Sec of State Kris Kobach is a potential leading candidate for our side, but he hasn’t officially gotten in yet. Of course, back in 1974, the popular Conservative Democrat Attorney General Vern Miller fully expected to hold the Governorship for the Dems on the strength of Watergate. Instead, he was upset by RINO “Moderate” Bob Bennett (the 1st of 3 RINOs elected up until Brownback, the first Conservative Republican since Avery).


38 posted on 04/12/2017 5:41:24 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Je Suis Pepe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; Galactic Overlord-In-Chief; AuH2ORepublican

” Vern Miller”

Another Joan Finney? Why the hell did she switch to the rats anyway?


39 posted on 04/12/2017 6:57:56 PM PDT by Impy (End the kritarchy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
were outspent by the Republican by a factor of over 4 to 3.

I was guess that in typical race in that district the ratio is a lot more than 4-3. Most parties spend virtually nothing in districts that their candidate won't be competitive in.

I can't even tell you who the Democrat that ran in 2016 against Bob Gibbs was in my district in Ohio. I don't remember seeing a single ad for the candidate.

The point is that your spin, the same one libtards are using, is hyperbole being used to advance a political message.

40 posted on 04/12/2017 8:33:57 PM PDT by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson