Posted on 04/06/2017 2:46:34 PM PDT by nickcarraway
Chemical weapons experts have thrown doubt on Russian claims the attack that killed more than 80 civilians in rebel-held Syria could have been caused by an air strike on a "warehouse" containing toxic agents.
The Syrian regime's ally Russia has sought to deflect an international outcry aimed at Damascus by claiming that Syrian air strikes had hit a warehouse where "toxic substances" were stored and that they were released by the explosion.
Olivier Lepick, a French expert with decades of experience of chemical weapons, told AFP on Thursday that the theory advanced by the Russians was "completely fanciful".
(Excerpt) Read more at al-monitor.com ...
Maybe he could explain why onscene videos (many now removed) show people walking around the “sarin” scene in bare feet and handling “victims’ with no CW protective gear and doctors with time to tweet
and no mothers of the children to be seen
I was wondering that same thing...any information on this???
This has the hallmarks of Soros doing an emergency false-flag to get Susan Rice the hell off the front pages.
But according to the big O we got 100% of chemical weapons out of Syria.
We are going to blow Assad’s ass off. :)
Damascus must come to ruin...
This won’t sway trump, so Assad will have to gas damascus
Prophecy says that Damascus must be completely destroyed before the return of Jesus Christ. Lwrs and the Globalists are determined to level Damascus and kill Assad. Seem they want the end of the world to come faster than Christians or Jews.......
Big question, no one seems to be asking: Where did those Chemical Weapons come from?
Obama Lied About Removing All Chemical Weapons from Syria
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | April6, 2017 | Rush Limbaugh
Posted on 4/6/2017, 2:28:24 PM by Kaslin
Obama Lied About Removing All Chemical Weapons from Syria
Apr 6, 2017
RUSH: There’s a fact-check outfit out there called PolitiFact, and it’s like all the other fact-check outfits. The Washington Post has one; the AP has one. These fact-check outfits exist only to discredit and impugn Trump. Well, the PolitiFact has had to retract a story they categorized as “mostly true” three years ago, and this story is big. Three years ago, Barack Obama and his Regime were an abject disaster. But they were claiming success after success after success, particularly in the Middle East.
One of the things that the Obama administration was celebrating was that they had completely removed chemical weapons from Syria. Obama drew that red line and the Syrians and everybody else realized the bad actor they were dealing with, and they cowered in fear, and they did remove 100% of their chemical weapons. There’s a problem now, though. Those chemical weapons were just used in an attack in Syria on Syrian citizens. So how could the Obama administration have gotten rid of all of these? The Obama… You know what the claim was? They claimed they gave all of that chemical weapons stock to the Russians.
Oh, yeah! Yeah, folks! The Obama administration — now the dire enemy of the Russians, victimized by the Russians — gave the chemical weapon stocks in Syria to the Russians.
Which means the Russians probably gave it right back to the Syrians. But the PolitiFact story retracts a 2014 article that said it was “mostly true” that the Obama administration “helped broker a deal that successfully removed 100% of chemical weapons from Syria.” So a story that was a lie backed up by PolitiFact for three years has been retracted, and the upshot is the Obama administration did not succeed in successfully removing all of Syria’s chemical weapons, as we now know because those weapons were used recently.
For full article go to the link below:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3541780/posts
The timing of Syria chemical exposure and exposure of Rice is not coincidental.
But according to the big O we got 100% of chemical weapons out of Syria.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3541792/posts?page=10#10
Three possibilities
1) Poison gas stored in ISIS weapons depot released from damaged storage containers or gas shells after air strike
2) Syrian forces poison gas attack- with or without Assad OK
3) ISIS release of gas or faking of gas deaths during or shortly after attack
Correct answer is number 3.
3) ISIS release of gas or faking of gas deaths during or shortly after attack.
Odd is it not that the vast majority were innocent civilians?
Where are the dead men with guns? Isis in the past has shown absolutely no compunction not to use civilians as shields and political ploys in their deaths.
I smell “False Flag.”
Great investigation techniques there Frenchy.
Did the “expert” look at an photos, write ups or any other information, or does his “expert” opinion of no specific context point with this specific incident. A general refutation of a claim is not worth much if no evidence is reviewed.
4) Someone else wanting to get us into a war, which it appeared that we would not enter.
Reading the article, there are dueling experts. Other experts say the “accident” theory is plausible.
Having the French as a resource is like having a banjo on a fishing trip.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.