Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Startup’s Plan To Cut Air Freight Costs In Half With 777-Size Drones
Fast Company ^ | 03.27.17 | 2:30 PM | DANIEL TERDIMAN

Posted on 03/27/2017 4:49:23 PM PDT by COBOL2Java


Commercial passenger jets fly at an altitude of around 30,000 feet or higher. Imagine sitting in a window seat of one of those giant aluminum tubes a few years from now as it makes its way across the Pacific Ocean. Picture looking down about 10,000 feet below. You just might see what one startup thinks could be the future of international cargo transport.

The idea is simple: Shipping by air is fast, but expensive. Boat is much cheaper, but very slow. So why not send all those boxes and packages on an un-piloted, amphibious Boeing 777-sized drone that can fly point to point and eventually drop off as much as 200,000 pounds of cargo at a seaside port? It would carry that cargo at about half the cost of normal air freight thanks to a more efficient use of fuel and the lack of an expensive crew.

That’s the thinking behind Natilus, a Richmond, California-based startup that this summer plans on flying FAA-approved tests of a 30-foot prototype that’s about the size and weight of a military Predator drone. The flight will mark the first significant step toward upending the global freight forwarding industry. Eventually, CEO Aleksey Matyushev says, the company hopes to fly the prototype on 30-hour test runs, carrying up to 700 pounds of cargo, between Los Angeles and Hawaii.

Natilus, which has raised $750,000 from venture capitalist Tim Draper and was incubated at the aviation-oriented Starburst Accelerator in Los Angeles, will power its drones with turboprop and turbofan engines and standard jet fuel, sending them on missions at an altitude of approximately 20,000 feet. That’s well below commercial planes, but high enough to be fuel-efficient.

(Excerpt) Read more at fastcompany.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: boondoggle; navigationhazard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Natilus’s founding team: LZ Zhang, Aleksey Matyushev, and Anatoly Starikov.
1 posted on 03/27/2017 4:49:23 PM PDT by COBOL2Java
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

What could possibly go wrong?


2 posted on 03/27/2017 4:52:13 PM PDT by beethovenfan (I always try to maximize my carbon footprint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

What is interesting about this concept is the regulatory hurdles it has to go through. The FAA will not allow unmanned drones to fly over US airspace, so it is limited to overseas shipping. It would be nice if they are successful, as they would be making progress towards unmanned aircraft in the US.


3 posted on 03/27/2017 4:56:02 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

If you’re on a commercial flight and the landing is exceptionally smooth, it is probably not the pilot landing the plane.


4 posted on 03/27/2017 4:57:31 PM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beethovenfan

Even without a crew or cargo, the rendering looks to be out of C.G.


5 posted on 03/27/2017 4:58:20 PM PDT by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches, and get with what's real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

I had an amphibious drone.....once.

Wasn’t supposed to be, but those little stick thingies are hard to use.


6 posted on 03/27/2017 4:58:49 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud

>>If you’re on a commercial flight and the landing is exceptionally smooth, it is probably not the pilot landing the plane.
<<

If you have ever read those really funny “squawk/reply” posts of pilot complaints and maintenance responses, my favorite is:

SQUAWK: Rough on auto-land.
REPLY: Auto-land not installed on this equipment.


7 posted on 03/27/2017 5:01:36 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Not tired of winning yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: beethovenfan

“... What could possibly go wrong? ...”
-
I came to this thread just to type those exact same words.


8 posted on 03/27/2017 5:02:55 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (I was conceived in liberty, how about you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Yeah


9 posted on 03/27/2017 5:05:36 PM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: beethovenfan
What could possibly go wrong?

Isn't that what Orville said to Wilbur?

10 posted on 03/27/2017 5:07:23 PM PDT by COBOL2Java ("Game over, man, game over!" (my advice to DemocRATs))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
What happened to the dirigibles that were going to be doing this?

Seems like they'd be less expensive to operate even with a two man crew. They also wouldn't have the additional potential failure points associated with landing and/or taking off from the water. Plus, with all the huge new natural gas finds, helium has to be readily available these days at a reasonable price.

I've been thinking that before long we'd hear about the plan for Amazon dirigibles doing this at lower cost even with Chinese flight crew provided through cooperation with the Chinese government.

11 posted on 03/27/2017 5:08:56 PM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Halve the cost? Is the pilot and copilot that much of the cost of a flight?


12 posted on 03/27/2017 5:10:53 PM PDT by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

The biggest operating cost is not pilots but fuel.


13 posted on 03/27/2017 5:20:41 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

How many millions (billions?) to develop such a plane?


14 posted on 03/27/2017 5:48:28 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Conservatives love America for what it is. Liberals hate America for the same reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cymbeline

Even if there are three crewmen (pilot, copilot, and flight engineer), They couldn’t add up to more than $500,000 per year. That is a fraction of the cost of operating the aircraft.


15 posted on 03/27/2017 5:50:35 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Conservatives love America for what it is. Liberals hate America for the same reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

“The FAA will not allow unmanned drones to fly over US airspace”

They have allowed ...


16 posted on 03/27/2017 6:25:28 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

17 posted on 03/27/2017 6:28:49 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
They have allowed ...

Under what circumstances outside of a test range?

18 posted on 03/27/2017 6:43:46 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Perfection will not be attained, until every single human working is unemployed.


19 posted on 03/27/2017 7:27:25 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

Watched a guy try out his two really nice model radio controlled amphibious airplanes from a lake during my Saturday morning run near a lake a number of years ago. I stopped and watched from a distance for a while. He took one out on his canoe and tried to have it take off from the water. Crashed it. Retrieved it and got the second one. Took it out on the lake. Same story. It was time to finish my run.


20 posted on 03/27/2017 7:55:30 PM PDT by Western Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson