Posted on 03/20/2017 6:20:35 PM PDT by artichokegrower
South Dakota has landed on San Francisco's list of places where city workers aren't allowed to go on official business because the state passed a law allowing religious-affiliated adoption agencies to not place children with unmarried or same-sex couples.South Dakota has landed on San Francisco's list of places where city workers aren't allowed to go on official business because the state passed a law allowing religious-affiliated adoption agencies to not place children with unmarried or same-sex couples.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
Seems mute. Can’t imagine why a city employee would need to go to SD on city business. But, hey, the Gay Bay is all about AtTeNtIoN.
Taxes, regulations, people with a work ethic. I’ve heard the radio ads when living in Minnesota.
I wound up moving my business to Texas no thanks to Crazy Eyes Dayton. According to Minnesota leftards I wasn’t welcome there anyway. Not drinking the Obama Kool Aid put me on the same level as the same level as the Klan (never mind the fact that the Klan was a DEMOCRAT outfit).
Come back when we retake the state.
OK, it’s going to be a while.
God bless you for making the right move to Texas.
I thought the title said Frisco bars travel to South Dakota. I thought that made sense that they’d need to drug South Dakotans to get them to accept that hideousness.
I don’t your average San Francisco resident could find South Dakota on the map if it wasn’t for the pipeline protests.
Well, I don’t think we should let our dollars travel to San Francisco, either! So there!
That’s right - if you work in San Francisco - you only have the freedoms and rights that they say you should have.
If it were me, I’d get another job. (Well, if it were me, I wouldn’t be working in that town, anyway.)
SF was my father’s (RIP) favorite town till the thought police destroyed it.
The only San Franciscans who would go to So. Dakota are those fleeing Sodom and Gomorrah. Or the S.F. Vietnam veterans who would go to piss on George McGovern’s grave.
If I go, I’m drinking a gallon of hot tea on the way. I’ll show old Comrade George what real “Yellow Rain” feels like.
Headline sounds like San Francisco bars can’t go to North Dakota. No Beers on Wheels for them.
Just have to hope our small percentage of rat pockets don’t get their wittle feelings hurt, and do something stupid!
I’d say this is a win/lose for South Dakota and San Fransicko, respectively.
Remember the good ol’ days when state marriage redefinition bills included “religious liberty” in their titles?
They were lying.
Yeah, isn’t that the truth?
It’s no-risk posturing. They have no reason to go to SD and so their empty posturing costs them nothing.
Let’s see them boycott the economic power house of Texas when we pass our no-tranny law.
I’d like to ask the butt-hurt leftists crying in their quiche what they think this law actually does. As usual, they are misrepresenting the reality of it.
It ALLOWS adoption agencies to set their own rules with regard to adopting out kids under their authority. It doesn’t “ban” anything.
Does the ninth circus approve?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.