Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

David Brock’s Media Matters Allegedly Hid Income From IRS For Years
News Nuke ^

Posted on 03/14/2017 10:40:25 AM PDT by TigerClaws

In December 2016, a largely unnoticed report from The Citizen’s Audit revealed that David Brock’s Media Matter’s allegedly hid $1 million from the IRS spanning 2010 to 2014.

Brock’s Media Matters owns a lease to the entire 6th floor of a building in Washington D.C. – also reported by The Citizen’s Audit – and subleases office space to thirteen other organizations. However, the city of Washington D.C. only recognizes one registered occupant on the 6th floor – Media Matters for America. If they all share the same floor space and pay rent to Brock, that's something to tell the IRS.

Pictured: 13 other organizations share the same address as Media Matters – some even detailing that they’re located on the 6th floor.

Media Matters sharing floor space with 13 other organizations isn’t wrong. However, the fact that Media Matters failed to report their sublet rental income to the IRS definitely is. The Citizen’s Audit report delves deeper…

According to their reporting, Media Matters claims two different figures to the IRS and in their financial statements. To the IRS, Media Matters reports $924,454 in total occupancy expenses and $0 of sublet rental income. In their financials, Media Matters reports $1,214,454 in total occupancy expenses, $290,000 of sublet rental income.

Tax instructions state “Do not net any rental income received from leasing or subletting rented space against the amount reported on line 16 for occupancy expenses.”

Media Matters’ 2014 financial statements, however, show that the reported occupancy expenses includes the net sublease income of $290,000.

Plain as day, it seems Media Matters broke tax guidelines. With this, a huge discrepancy is uncovered:

Media Matters claimed to the IRS in 2014 that their total occupancy expenses in 2014 were $924,454. Media Matters claimed in their 2014 financial statements that their total occupancy expenses were $1,214,454.

Which one of these is true – what Media Matters reported to the IRS or what they reported in their financials? The better question is, where did the $290,000 in sublet rent income go? It wasn’t reported to the IRS in 2014. The IRS provides two options for reporting sublet rental income. Either report the rental income as a program-service revenue or report the rental income as gross rents… On their 2014 tax form, Media Matters did neither:

Furthermore, General Services Administration, a government organization, signed a 10 year lease in 2009 for the entire 5th floor of the same building Media Matters is in.

For the 5th floor, the lease is $942,021 per year; that includes operating expenses and real estate taxes. The lease also makes no reference of an escalation clause.

In 2009, Media Matters signed a 10 year lease for the entire 6th floor of the building and claim to spend much more in rent than the General Services Administration. Interestingly enough, Media Matters specifies that this amount does not include operating expenses and real estate taxes:

It seems Media Matters is truthful in reporting that its occupancy claims were $924,454. However, reporting they collected $0 in sublet rental income was a lie. Media Matters is indeed receiving payments for rent – in 2014, they took payment from American Bridge 21st Century for “office rent”.

Allegedly, with this report, David Brock and his associates are likely pocketing the sublet rent income for personal use and hiding it from the IRS.

Furthermore, compare Media Matters’ reported sublet rental income on their IRS form 990s and their financial statements found in Massachusetts non-profit document search database (search under “AG Account Number: 047309”). On their taxes, they report $0. On their financials, $1,052,500 is reported in sublet rental income spanning 2010 to 2014.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 527s; audit; bonnergroup; brock; davidbrock; franklinforum; mediamatters; mm4a; mmfa; pacs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Paging Trump's IRS....
1 posted on 03/14/2017 10:40:25 AM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

JAIL TIME!!!!


2 posted on 03/14/2017 10:43:57 AM PDT by WENDLE (We said REPEAL the socialism NOT replace with other socialism.!! RINOCARE GOES NOWHERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Ruh-Roh!...................


3 posted on 03/14/2017 10:44:43 AM PDT by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Brock didn’t have a thing to worry about with Obama as president. Obama’s motto was, “Punish our enemies, reward our friends.” Can you begin to imagine how much Obama’s friends got away with?


4 posted on 03/14/2017 10:46:20 AM PDT by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
David Brock’s Media Matters Allegedly Hid Income From IRS For Years

That's illegal if an ordinary person does it, isn't it?

5 posted on 03/14/2017 10:46:38 AM PDT by Steely Tom (Liberals think in propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
"Paging Trump's IRS...."

One of the curious things is that Trump has not fired John Koskinen who was the IRS commissioner under Obama during the time of all the targeting of conservative groups. He could fire him any day he wanted, but not so far.

6 posted on 03/14/2017 10:46:41 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
David Brock and his associates are likely pocketing the sublet rent income for personal use and hiding it from the IRS.

It's OK when liberals do this.

7 posted on 03/14/2017 10:47:04 AM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

This was part of the material that James Alefantis used to extort David Brock:

After their eventful breakup, I understand Brock had to sell his Cape Cod home to raise the required blackmail Hush Money.

It was sort of a faggot-flavored version of a Denny Hastert type situation.


8 posted on 03/14/2017 10:47:34 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Looks like someone was just lazy and/or incompetent.


9 posted on 03/14/2017 10:48:07 AM PDT by Mr. Douglas (Best. Election. EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Looks like the Pizzagate Crowd will go down via the Capone maneuver... in exchange for ratting on their fellow snakes.


10 posted on 03/14/2017 10:49:16 AM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WENDLE
Can you say kickback?

DAVID BROCK Money Laundering Scheme Exposed:
14 Pro-Clinton Super PACs & Non-Profits Implicated
zerohedge.com ^ | Sep 20, 2016 / FR Posted by Helicondelta

David Brock has 7 non-profits, 3 Super PACs, one 527-committee, one LLC, one joint fundraising committee, and one unregistered solicitor crammed into his office in Washington DC.

Uncovered records expose a constant flow of money between these organizations.

The Bonner Group, his professional solicitor, works off a commission. Every time money gets passed around, Bonner receives a 12.5% cut.

Follow the money: Say, for example, you donate $1,062,857 to Media Matters for America. This is how David Brock would have used your charitable donation in 2014:

1- Media Matters would receive your $1,062,857 donation The Bonner Group would earn a $132,857 commission Media Matters would retain $930,000

2- Next, Media Matters would give what’s left of your entire donation, $930,000, to the Franklin Education Forum The Bonner Group would ‘earn’ a $116,250 commission The Franklin Education Forum would retain $813,750

3- The Franklin Education Forum would then forward the remaining $813,750 to The Franklin Forum The Bonner Group would ‘earn’ a $101,718 commission The Franklin Forum would retain $712,031

In the end, Brock’s solicitor would have pocketed $350,825, almost a third of your initial donation! That’s a far cry from the advertised 12.5% commission....more at zerohedge.com


11 posted on 03/14/2017 10:50:18 AM PDT by Liz (DNC Chair Perez's new Democrat slogan: Join us, or we'll sue Trump. W w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WENDLE

I need more popcorn for this show.


12 posted on 03/14/2017 10:50:35 AM PDT by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Probably went to Brock’s trysts at the “men’s” club.


13 posted on 03/14/2017 10:51:13 AM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

I sometimes think he’s ‘saving’ a lot of the bad guys to string them out on CSPAN for weeks and weeks of hearings. Americans need to be able to examine swamp denizens as they’re dredged and netted out, to understand the scale of the rot.


14 posted on 03/14/2017 10:52:55 AM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All
David Brock has 7 non-profits,

Non-profits are just another way for liberals to launder money and buy votes.
15 posted on 03/14/2017 10:58:56 AM PDT by Kid Shelleen (Beat your plowshares into swords. Let the weak say I am strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Fwd to Sessions


16 posted on 03/14/2017 11:02:00 AM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

Bookmark - read later


17 posted on 03/14/2017 11:02:15 AM PDT by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

David Brock and associates are slime. Trump will eat them for breakfast.


18 posted on 03/14/2017 11:02:52 AM PDT by upchuck (U have not lived today until u have done something for someone who can never repay u ~ John Bunyan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

No Obama David Ha


19 posted on 03/14/2017 11:05:05 AM PDT by scooby321 (o even lower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
"That's illegal if an ordinary person does it, isn't it? "

Yeah, but libs, especially libs that are homos, are above the law.

20 posted on 03/14/2017 11:07:25 AM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson