Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Three challenges for the web, according to its inventor
Web Foundation ^ | Mar 12, 2017 | Sir Tim Berners-Lee

Posted on 03/13/2017 7:30:39 PM PDT by upchuck

Today is the world wide web’s 28th birthday. Here’s a message from our founder and web inventor Sir Tim Berners-Lee on how the web has evolved, and what we must do to ensure it fulfils his vision of an equalising platform that benefits all of humanity.

Today marks 28 years since I submitted my original proposal for the world wide web. I imagined the web as an open platform that would allow everyone, everywhere to share information, access opportunities and collaborate across geographic and cultural boundaries. In many ways, the web has lived up to this vision, though it has been a recurring battle to keep it open. But over the past 12 months, I’ve become increasingly worried about three new trends, which I believe we must tackle in order for the web to fulfill its true potential as a tool which serves all of humanity.

1) We’ve lost control of our personal data

The current business model for many websites offers free content in exchange for personal data. Many of us agree to this – albeit often by accepting long and confusing terms and conditions documents – but fundamentally we do not mind some information being collected in exchange for free services. But, we’re missing a trick. As our data is then held in proprietary silos, out of sight to us, we lose out on the benefits we could realise if we had direct control over this data, and chose when and with whom to share it. What’s more, we often do not have any way of feeding back to companies what data we’d rather not share – especially with third parties – the T&Cs are all or nothing.

This widespread data collection by companies also has other impacts. Through collaboration with – or coercion of – companies, governments are also increasingly watching our every move online, and passing extreme laws that trample on our rights to privacy. In repressive regimes, it’s easy to see the harm that can be caused – bloggers can be arrested or killed, and political opponents can be monitored. But even in countries where we believe governments have citizens’ best interests at heart, watching everyone, all the time is simply going too far. It creates a chilling effect on free speech and stops the web from being used as a space to explore important topics, like sensitive health issues, sexuality or religion.

2) It’s too easy for misinformation to spread on the web

Today, most people find news and information on the web through just a handful of social media sites and search engines. These sites make more money when we click on the links they show us. And, they choose what to show us based on algorithms which learn from our personal data that they are constantly harvesting. The net result is that these sites show us content they think we’ll click on – meaning that misinformation, or ‘fake news’, which is surprising, shocking, or designed to appeal to our biases can spread like wildfire. And through the use of data science and armies of bots, those with bad intentions can game the system to spread misinformation for financial or political gain.

3) Political advertising online needs transparency and understanding

Political advertising online has rapidly become a sophisticated industry. The fact that most people get their information from just a few platforms and the increasing sophistication of algorithms drawing upon rich pools of personal data, means that political campaigns are now building individual adverts targeted directly at users. One source suggests that in the 2016 US election, as many as 50,000 variations of adverts were being served every single day on Facebook, a near-impossible situation to monitor. And there are suggestions that some political adverts – in the US and around the world – are being used in unethical ways – to point voters to fake news sites, for instance, or to keep others away from the polls. Targeted advertising allows a campaign to say completely different, possibly conflicting things to different groups. Is that democratic?

These are complex problems, and the solutions will not be simple. But a few broad paths to progress are already clear. We must work together with web companies to strike a balance that puts a fair level of data control back in the hands of people, including the development of new technology like personal “data pods” if needed and exploring alternative revenue models like subscriptions and micropayments. We must fight against government over-reach in surveillance laws, including through the courts if necessary. We must push back against misinformation by encouraging gatekeepers such as Google and Facebook to continue their efforts to combat the problem, while avoiding the creation of any central bodies to decide what is “true” or not. We need more algorithmic transparency to understand how important decisions that affect our lives are being made, and perhaps a set of common principles to be followed. We urgently need to close the “internet blind spot” in the regulation of political campaigning.

Our team at the Web Foundation will be working on many of these issues as part of our new five year strategy – researching the problems in more detail, coming up with proactive policy solutions and bringing together coalitions to drive progress towards a web that gives equal power and opportunity to all. I urge you to support our work however you can – by spreading the word, keeping up pressure on companies and governments or by making a donation. We’ve also compiled a directory of other digital rights organisations around the world for you to explore and consider supporting too.

I may have invented the web, but all of you have helped to create what it is today. All the blogs, posts, tweets, photos, videos, applications, web pages and more represent the contributions of millions of you around the world building our online community. All kinds of people have helped, from politicians fighting to keep the web open, standards organisations like W3C enhancing the power, accessibility and security of the technology, and people who have protested in the streets. In the past year, we have seen Nigerians stand up to a social media bill that would have hampered free expression online, popular outcry and protests at regional internet shutdowns in Cameroon and great public support for net neutrality in both India and the European Union.

It has taken all of us to build the web we have, and now it is up to all of us to build the web we want – for everyone. If you would like to be more involved, then do join our mailing list, do contribute to us, do join or donate to any of the organisations which are working on these issues around the world.

 

Sir Tim Berners-Lee

The Web Foundation is at the forefront of the fight to advance and protect the web for everyone. We believe doing so is essential to reverse growing inequality and empower citizens. You can follow our work by signing up to our newsletter, and find a local digital rights organisation to support here on this list. Additions to the list are welcome and may be sent to contact@webfoundation.org

Please share this letter on Twitter using the hashtag #HappyBirthdayWWW


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS:
What is this BS? Everybody knows Al Gore invented the Internet.
1 posted on 03/13/2017 7:30:39 PM PDT by upchuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: upchuck

the web invented itself,networks were already developing. Pick one.


2 posted on 03/13/2017 7:41:52 PM PDT by DaxtonBrown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Well, BS is right. let me focus on:

2) It’s too easy for misinformation to spread on the web

That's just so loaded, it's not even funny. Hint: What's the difference between information and misinformation?

Answer ... NOTHING!

3 posted on 03/13/2017 7:41:58 PM PDT by dr_lew (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Bookmark


4 posted on 03/13/2017 7:43:09 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

“Today, most people find news and information on the web through just a handful of social media sites and search engines. These sites make more money when we click on the links they show us. And, they choose what to show us based on algorithms which learn from our personal data that they are constantly harvesting. The net result is that these sites show us content they think we’ll click on – meaning that misinformation, or ‘fake news’, which is surprising, shocking, or designed to appeal to our biases can spread like wildfire.”

This is complete bunk. If I google “global warming” I’m given Alarmist site after Alarmist site and misinformation as far as the eye can scroll.

“And through the use of data science and armies of bots, those with bad intentions can game the system to spread misinformation for financial or political gain.”

Now that makes sense: Google “global warming”.


5 posted on 03/13/2017 7:58:21 PM PDT by JPJones (George Washington's Tariffs were Patriotic. Build a Wall and Build a Wall of tariffs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
We must push back against misinformation by encouraging gatekeepers such as Google and Facebook to continue their efforts to combat the problem, while avoiding the creation of any central bodies to decide what is “true” or not.

I don't think this guy is as smart as he thinks he is.
6 posted on 03/13/2017 7:58:33 PM PDT by Garth Tater (What's mine is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
In the old days, lots of people wanted their own personal computer instead of sharing resources with others on big computers... so they could keep their own personal data on their own computer at home.

After the WWW was created, lots of people share resources with others on big computers (the cloud), and move their personal data onto the cloud where lots of people access their data... and do it willingly.

Wake up, people! Keep your personal data, personal. You put it out there, you may be sorry someday. I like the Web. Use it, abuse it, but don't let it abuse you.

7 posted on 03/13/2017 8:03:48 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Garth Tater

“I don’t think this guy is as smart as he thinks he is.”

Oh, he’s probably plenty smart, the problem is he’s a socialist.


8 posted on 03/13/2017 8:06:21 PM PDT by Rembrandt (Part of the 51% who pay Federal taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JPJones
Now that makes sense: Google “global warming”.

People should stay away from Google, and use other search engines. In particular, use search engines that don't track your information and don't store it. Less spam will come your way. Do a search for other search engines and compare, then leave Google behind.

9 posted on 03/13/2017 8:07:20 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

What about the endless misinformation the TV news media puts out 24/7?

I guess that’s A-OK.


10 posted on 03/13/2017 8:08:26 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaxtonBrown; upchuck

The Internet was originally just an email system for individual scientists and engineers to exchange information. The world wide web (the collection of sites with www. in their addresses) is a very different kettle of fish.


11 posted on 03/13/2017 8:15:56 PM PDT by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Targeted advertising allows a campaign to say completely different, possibly conflicting things to different groups. Is that democratic?

Non-sequitur.

12 posted on 03/13/2017 8:58:44 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Everywhere is freaks and hairies Dykes and fairies Tell me where is sanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roadcat

Absolutely correct about the cloud. Most people don’t realize how vulnerable they make themselves when they put personal data in the cloud.

Corporations have this problem also. They get all excited about “cloud-based solutions.” Bunk! Major corps think nothing of putting all their HR and payroll info in the cloud.


13 posted on 03/13/2017 9:14:32 PM PDT by upchuck (If a Moose has Diarrhea, is that Mooslime? h/t Scrambler Bob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
What about the endless misinformation the TV news media puts out 24/7?

Endless misinformation I don't watch as I have no TV.

14 posted on 03/13/2017 9:17:38 PM PDT by upchuck (If a Moose has Diarrhea, is that Mooslime? h/t Scrambler Bob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

I was not referring to you. My point is they’re all concerned about Internet misinformation, yet TV network news is total 100% manipulated misinformation 24/7.


15 posted on 03/13/2017 9:20:40 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew
That's just so loaded, it's not even funny. Hint: What's the difference between information and misinformation?

I always thought that the ones and zeroes of misinformation look somehow different.

Regards,

16 posted on 03/13/2017 10:14:23 PM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson