Posted on 03/13/2017 8:27:49 AM PDT by antidemoncrat
If I read the article correctly, the penalty is for the loss of sperm by masturbation and thereby not creating a life. Based on that interpretation, shouldn’t women be fined for menstruating?
Design the pamphlet so it can be held in one hand (the other hand is busy).
I realize you have a “condition”, but what’s up with wearing those mittens year ‘round?
A Federal Excise Tax on all dildos!
This is not a serious proposal, just some feminist Democrat being snarky by submitting a law which she (incorrectly) sees as the equivalent to restrictions on abortion funding, or requirements for things like informed consent before having an abortion, or - horror of horrors - requiring affluent women pay for their own contraceptives.
[[Can we just cease having law makers now?]]
“There are at least 5,000 federal criminal laws, with 10,000-300,000 regulations that can be enforced criminally.
from 2000 through 2007, Congress enacted 452 new criminal offenses”
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2015/06/06/how-many-federal-laws-are-there-again-n2009184
ummm, it’s not retroactive, is it ?
Yes.
Enough already.
We have no further need for law makers, and we could now probably use law unmakers.
My sperm is no more a person then your unfertilized egg
Its when the sperm and egg meet..then we have a new third party that has a say
If its illegal for me to ejaculate then it’s illegal for you to ovulate
Are there. Ot already rules limiting the right of a man to get a vasectomy without the wives approval ?!?
There we go folks. I propose a $100 fine for each time a woman refuses to receive the "deposit".
The distinction that she fails to understand is that no one is trying to prevent anything a woman does with an unfertilized egg, so creating a false dichotomy with sperm is just indicative of a failed education. The debate is about fertilized eggs (also known as a baby), and whether they, being human, are entitled to protection.
Wankerette
This is probably a reasonable response to a law that banned contraception for women.
Except there are no laws banning contraception for women.
Instead, the only argument over contraception is whether a health insurance paid for by others is REQUIRED to cover contraception.
The debate then for masturbation should be about whether a man can get a government check to pay for a sex worker to help him with his task.
Ok. And i propose fining a woman every time she menstruates for wasting a potential human.
Exactly. There are 3 aspects of this bill:
Ladies & gents, the latest & greatest new Fad in Fakedom: Fake Laws!
Isn’t that cute. The little feminist thinks she scored a point. :)
I understand that. But my complaint about it goes into the stupidity of spending the peoples money with trash like this being submitted with all the other problems they are having in Texas like other states. It had a number, House Bill 4260, therefore it took people to create it, get it formatted, and submitted to the state properly using taxpayer money. It further is going to cost the taxpayer to get it time on the floor at much higher prices until it is finally, I hope, chased off the floor or voted down. Money all the way.
If this is how she wants to waste the money of the people she is supposed to be representing, then embarrass the he)) out of her by putting this crap on national television and identifying her. Her voters need to see how she is handling their trust and funds. And the federal voters need to see just how the libs will mismanage their taxpayer money if they let them. More lies. Nail each one to the cross.
red
$100 ain’t gonna fix the problem you have with being “a little short”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.