Posted on 03/10/2017 11:46:58 AM PST by bamahead
My company has had biometric screenings for a few years under the guise that the employee can get discounted insurance rates. I personally think they do it to see who may have chronic illnesses coming and those will be the ones they target for layoffs. I’ve never subjected myself to the screening. Hopefully it won’t be mandatory in the next two years and I will be retired by then.
Gregor Mendel may have started publishing his results by then, but the Library of Congress probably did not subscribe to the journal his articles were published in. James Garfield could have translated them for his colleagues.
Gregor Mendel may have started publishing his results by then, but the Library of Congress probably did not subscribe to the journal his articles were published in. James Garfield could have translated them for his colleagues.
That little fourth amendment thingy is such a bother.
Which is absurdly ironic...
I paid good money for a most respected and expensive genetic profile, because I was adopted and have no meaningful family medical history.
Obama's Department of Health or some such prohibited the genetics company from revealing what I paid the company to find out.
It's been a year and a half...
Minimum passing grade : 90%
No affirmative Action exceptions of any kind.
If the company was 23andMe, I think they were blocked for a time but are again offering medical analyses...but they are not terribly expensive so maybe you meant a different company.
Unfortunately, DNA tests do not reveal where someone was born.
Crap, I couldn’t take being an employee 16 years ago, so stayed working for myself. Sounds like it’s more or less a coins concentration camp type setup now. Effing tyrants.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.