Posted on 03/09/2017 10:31:42 AM PST by COUNTrecount
This is not about investigating the DNC so much as to keep the bogus ‘RUSSIA HACKED THE ELECTION” crap in the headlines. Republicans are beyond STUPID!
HMMMM? First thought:
He’s setting up a perjury trap. Maybe even a sting operation.
the stupid party stays stupid....
************
These are the very same people who confidently claimed they were ready to repeal and replace Obamacare. But when forced to act as a result of the election, they were totally unprepared and had no idea what to do. The Republicans epitomize weakness and incompetence.
The Stupid Party has a well earned moniker.
Does any sane person think that had crooked Hillary won the election, congress would be wasting time with this crap? No, they would be passing TPP and the rest of the globalist Uniparty junk.
This company is funded by Google and it has several former FBI men on its board.
The GOP is not only stupid, it is also fundamentally deceitful and evil.
Are the Awan brothers scheduled to address the committee?
The committee is chaired by Nunes.
you know any evidence will disappear.........how many times did people in the Obama admin delete oh I mean have a hard drive crash so things went poof
I dunno. After Trumps Twitter hand grenade last weekend, I’m getting the sense that even the Washington Post and CNN are desperate to get the sordid hacking behind the 2016 election out of the headlines.
Where you see “Crowdstrike”, read “seditious elements in the CIA”.
Why should anyone be surprised? After all, these are Obama's Republicans. The only thing that changed in November was we got Trump in the White House. The GOP old guard stayed put.
I’m almost persuaded that “direct action” is the only way to beat these dogs to the curb for good.
The website for the hacking tool claims it was written in Ukraine.
That’s interesting.
Alperovitch bases his claim partly on the claims of a Russian blogger. The blogger claims that Ukrainian military units were targeted via malware inserted onto Ukrainian tablet computers, the malware provided to Russia the location of Ukrainian troops. As evidence the blogger cites a 2016 International Institute for Strategic Studies report of a sharp reduction of Ukrainian D-30 howitzers between 2013 and 2015. Ukraine denies any large loss of D-30 howitzers. Alperovitch claims this same malware was used to breach the DNC email system.
Why would Ukraine write software to target their troops?
Alperovitch’s claims are dubious. Add in the fact that he’s been provided $100M by Clinton colleague Timothy Geither’s company, Warburg Pincus, and the claims are even less credible.
Interesting article from VOA - http://www.voanews.com/a/skeptics-doubt-ukraine-hack-link-to-dnc-cyberattack/3649234.html
URL for the blog post mentioned in the VOA article - http://thesaker.is/ukrainian-army-losses-in-ato-anti-terrorist-operation-according-to-the-iisss-military-balance/
Jackie Speier will get everyone with a camel a security clearance and pay them 3x the going rate.
Do you mean to say that you do not have a problem with Crowdtrike being the only technical expert witness in the investigation??—>
CrowdStrike is a firm hired by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and has become the primary source of the narrative about Russian hacking of the 2016 election and has acted as a mouthpiece for the Democrats since last June.
Maybe, you were referring to something else. Apologies, if I’ve misinterpreted.
FReeRegards,
FMOKM
Some GOPs had sold their soul to higher bidders.
To clarify...
The Russian blogger claims the software was written in Russia to target Ukrainian troops. The software’s website claims it was written in Ukraine.
Sh@t hitting fan for political elites.
Now we know why they attempted to derail Trump campaign.
The skeletons are pounding on the closet doors....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.