Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why ObamaCare Cannot Simply Be Repealed… (Dont get PO at not total repeal. Not possible till 18)
conservativetreehouse (Treepers) ^ | March 7, 17 | Sundance.

Posted on 03/07/2017 7:59:07 PM PST by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-192 next last
To: Az Joe

Take your own advice.


61 posted on 03/07/2017 8:46:29 PM PST by Fungi (Every breath, another five thousand fungal spores enter your body. All five thousand will be named.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
In 2018, the GOP can go to the voters, give us a Senate supermajority to finish the job.

If the GOP passes a RyanCare bill in 2016 that still keeps most of ObamaCare's most destructive provisions in place (and by this I mean the provisions that have driven medical insurance premiums up through the roof), then there isn't a chance in hell they're going to get 60 Senators in office in 2018. They'll be lucky to keep the 52 they have.

I'm OK with the incremental repeal as long as the mandates disappear (it looks like they almost certainly will) and eliminate the regulatory burdens that make insurance so expensive as to be worthless to most people anyway.

62 posted on 03/07/2017 8:49:16 PM PST by Alberta's Child (President Donald J. Trump ... Making America Great Again, 140 Characters at a Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Sure, the GOP can do that unilaterally but as Harry Reid discovered to his regret, when you’re in the minority, you lose leverage.

When did he discover this? When have them Dems ever paid a price for this?

Do Republicans really want to find themselves a powerless minority one day and is passing a complete repeal bill worth the cost?

Seems the Republicans are a powerless majority right now. What sense does that make? Historic majority in the House, significant majority in the Senate, and the White House. If we can't get it done now, then when????

63 posted on 03/07/2017 8:51:04 PM PST by kevao (Biblical Jesus: Give your money to the poor. Socialist Jesus: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

No such thing as a ‘constitutional’ filibuster. It wasn’t written in the Constitution other than in the penumbra of ‘the senate makes its own rules.’ They didn’t make it up until well in the 1800s and then it was used mainly, by Democrats, to protect slavery. What we recall as the ‘traditional’ filibuster was the marathon talkathons in the style of Jimmy Stewart. Where you could eventually wear down the minority. That was ended c. 1970 by Rat Senate under Mike Mansfield who replaced it with the current, painless to the minority, procedural filibuster. I’d nuke it back to the pre-Mansfield traditional filibuster. If we ever get rid of the 17th I’d consider nuking the rest of it.


64 posted on 03/07/2017 8:51:48 PM PST by JohnBovenmyer (Waiting for the tweets to hatch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
The Senate’s function as a “cooling saucer” for House legislation would be gone forever.

That was never the Senate's function in the U.S. Constitution. It became the Senate's function through its own stupid rules. There's nothing sacred about a 60-vote majority in the Senate. You might have a stronger case for using the supermajority requirement in the Senate as protection against bad legislation if the place wasn't filled with so many @ssholes.

65 posted on 03/07/2017 8:52:16 PM PST by Alberta's Child (President Donald J. Trump ... Making America Great Again, 140 Characters at a Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Az Joe

Ok. You sound intelligent.


66 posted on 03/07/2017 8:53:19 PM PST by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148) is repealed, and the provisions of law amended or repealed by such Act are restored or revived as if such Act had not been enacted.

That’s it.

Medicaid modifications are separate bills.

They only reason repeal is being coupling with a replacement bill is leverage. Just as they’ve done with “comprehensive immigration reform” - no laws will be enforced until we get our amnesty. Now they will not repeal ACA, only modify it. If they uncouple repeal they loose their leverage. The Uniparty holds this country hostage every damn time.

> Republicans who think they can manage leftist programs better than the Democrats.

How very right you are.


67 posted on 03/07/2017 8:53:36 PM PST by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Why ObamaCare Cannot Simply Be Repealed… (Dont get PO at not total repeal. Not possible till 18)

Assuming your statement is true, WHY pass this insipid GOP-Care now? Why not wait until 2018?

68 posted on 03/07/2017 8:53:49 PM PST by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

“The Feds should get completely out of health-care, except for active-duty and retired military veterans, and of course existing Seniors”

I’m afraid that would be a bridge too far even at this time. It would pass the House, but we wouldn’t even get 51 R votes for that approach in the Senate. I think the Rand Paul bill is the way to go right now. Health care costs need to start coming down yesterday, or we will be looking at single-payer in 2020 nationwide.


69 posted on 03/07/2017 8:54:18 PM PST by SecAmndmt (Arm yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
"The next step to "replace" ObamaCare is for some enterprising people to come up with a financial/insurance product that mirrors all the good things people enjoy about medical insurance without the bad sh!t that makes it expensive and onerously administered. Start marketing it to the public in a state that doesn't mind telling the Federal government to "F%$& off!" (I'm thinking Kentucky might be an ideal place for a number of reasons). Ten bucks says the Federal government won't do a damn thing about it. Congress will probably thank you for getting the issue off their desks without forcing them to vote on anything."

You make a valid point. Via the 10th Amendment, Insurance was typically regulated by the State Commissioner, until Obamacare came around. So everyone wants Medical Marijuana and States Rights? Well good, two can play at that game.

BTW the Product is an HSA w/ Direct Primary Care Tom Prices Bill HR2300 made it payable with your HSA dollars where as now, you only can do it through your Employer, not everyone can. DPC is the cost saver....

70 posted on 03/07/2017 8:54:28 PM PST by taildragger (Do you hear the people singing? The Song of Angry Men!....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener

Ah.
Sundance is good on some things so I try not to let his opining on things he obviously doesn’t understand ‘get to’ me.


71 posted on 03/07/2017 8:54:42 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Democrats are never going to pass a bill to kill Obamacare outright.

That's fine with me.

I want a straight repeal vote. If it doesn't pass, so be it; then the Trump administration should nuke all waivers and exemptions and force everyone to sign up for Obamacare then.

All Ryan is doing is giving GOP candidates the rope to hang themselves with in 2018 and jeopardizing their majority.

Like I said a million times: No Republican voted for Obamacare, so they are not obligated to try and "fix it" either. This notion that Republicans need to "do something" about replacing Obamacare is idiotic on its face. Let the thing implode on its own, and your precious Senate deliberations and process will be maintained.

72 posted on 03/07/2017 8:55:35 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (STOP THE TAPE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Fungi

I heard awhile back that the Parliamentarian told them they can only repeal part of it because it was passed through reconciliation. Well the Dems Parliamentarian told the Dems they could pass it through reconciliation so the Republicans should tell their Parliamentarian to shove it and vote to repeal. Lol


73 posted on 03/07/2017 8:55:47 PM PST by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

Fact: pass any piece of tax/revenue crap with 60 votes. go to reconciliation and then repeal obama care. That is how they passed it.


74 posted on 03/07/2017 8:57:20 PM PST by kvanbrunt2 (all your base are belong to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Az Joe
Hey stupid, how? They need 60 votes right now!

Hey moron - Republicans don't have to do ANYTHING.

Just put a simple repeal up for vote, and if the Dems/RINOs kill it, so be it.

What part of "NO REPUBLICANS VOTED FOR OBAMACARE" do you people not understand?

75 posted on 03/07/2017 8:58:13 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (STOP THE TAPE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

The bill unveiled today is only one of three phases.

First phase is tinkering with the financial mechanisms to make Obamacare more manageable. Second phases is HHS issues regulations that would reduce costs and begin a transition period to free market health care. Third phase is complete repeal of Obamacare.

First two phases can be done through reconciliation and implementing regulations.

Third phase will have to wait until you get that supermajority and as you pointed out, no guarantee it will happen.

Politics is the art of the possible.


76 posted on 03/07/2017 9:00:07 PM PST by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Fungi

Nonsense. A fake post. The got it passed through reconciliation, not 60 votes, it can be repealed the same way. Lyin’ Ryan and Turtle face Mcconnell need to grow some testicles and show the party they mean business.>>> agreed after all it is a tax declared by our scotus. recon can kill it.


77 posted on 03/07/2017 9:01:00 PM PST by kvanbrunt2 (all your base are belong to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: citizen

And when they do it that way......the Republicans lose the house and the senate in the future and the Dems amend it anyway the Secretary shall decide. It’ll be a never ending piece of crap.


78 posted on 03/07/2017 9:01:12 PM PST by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kevao

“And the party that owns ObamaCare-Lite in 2020 (GOP) gets slaughtered.”

Yep. I would rather keep Obamacare as is, if we are forced to make that choice. Let Obama own the destruction of the health care system.


79 posted on 03/07/2017 9:01:13 PM PST by SecAmndmt (Arm yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

Stamp your feet and yell a little louder. As use more capital letters. Maybe that will work.


80 posted on 03/07/2017 9:01:29 PM PST by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-192 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson