Posted on 02/22/2017 7:23:17 AM PST by Gamecock
On Feb. 20, President Donald Trump announced that Army Lt. Gen. Herbert Raymond “H.R.” McMaster will replace retired Army Gen. Mike Flynn as his national security advisor. A career officer, he served during the Persian Gulf War as well as the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
McMaster joined the military in 1984, and is still serving on active duty. Prior to accepting this role as national security advisor, he served as the director of Army Capabilities Integration Center and deputy commanding general with U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command. In 2005, he commanded 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment and secured the city of Tal Afar in Iraq from Sunni insurgents. In 2006 and 2007, he was passed over twice for promotion to brigadier general, despite being one of the most revered leaders in the Iraq War.
1. Never doubt the complexity of warfare.
In 1997, McMaster published “From Dereliction of Duty: Johnson, McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Lies That Led to Vietnam,” his dissertation based on documents that were recently declassified at the time about the Vietnam War. The book strongly criticized the Joint Chiefs for their failed leadership during the war. Here’s what he wrote about conflict and how Vietnam was lost.
“It’s so damn complex. If you ever think you have the solution to this, you’re wrong and you’re dangerous.”
2. Wars are not just won or lost on the battlefield.
In “From Dereliction of Duty,” McMaster also argued that Washington politics can be just as dangerous to the military as the actual enemy.
“The war in Vietnam was not lost in the field, nor was it lost on the front pages of the New York Times or the college campuses. It was lost in Washington, D.C.”
3. Great military leaders show courage in battle, but also show courage to stand up to their superiors.
In April 2013, McKinsey & Company, published a Q&A with McMaster in which he described how militaries learn and adapt. In the interview, he specifically explained the need for military leaders who are prepared for combat on physical, psychological, and emotional levels.
“I think there are usually four causes of breakdowns in moral character—ignorance, uncertainty, fear, or combat trauma. It is important to understand the effects of those four factors on an organization and then educate soldiers about what we expect of them. We need leaders who have physical and mental courage on the battlefield, of course, but also the courage to speak their minds and offer respectful and candid feedback to their superiors. Our leaders can’t feel compelled to tell their bosses what they want to hear.”
4. We must study the past to prepare our leaders to future responsibilities and challenges.
During this same interview, McMaster also expressed the necessity of studying military history.
“As one of my favorite military historians, Sir Michael Howard, suggested, you have to study history to get its analytic power in width, in depth, and in context: in width, to see change over time; in depth, by looking at specific campaigns and battles to understand the complex causality of events that created them; and then in the context of politics, policy, and diplomacy. Studying history is invaluable in preparing our officers for their future responsibilities.”
5. We must be wary of the civilian-military divide and its threat to the “warrior ethos.”
As the director of the Army Capabilities Integration Center of U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command, McMaster gave the keynote address at Georgetown University’s Veterans Day ceremony on Nov. 11, 2014. Here’s what he said about the warrior ethos being under constant threat:
“The warrior ethos is at risk because popular culture waters down and coarsens the warrior ethos. Warriors are most often portrayed as fragile traumatized human beings. Hollywood tells us little about the warrior’s calling or commitment to his or her fellow warriors or what compels him or her to act courageously, endure hardships, take risks, or make sacrifices.”
The more I hear about this guy, the more I like him.
McMaster for president in 2024.
I’m getting the impression he is thoughtful and brilliant as well as a courageous war fighter.
His book is sitting in my Kindle, calling to me.
I can’t even tell you how happy I am that Trump is choosing Generals who are actual war fighters. And who believe in winning.
These generals were young commanders/staff officers in Desert Storm. They learned how to win from Generals who were young officers in Vietnam who swore never again.
When they grew up they were the senior leaders of OIF/OEF. Clearly many of them leaned their lessons well.
“I’m getting the impression he is thoughtful and brilliant as well as a courageous war fighter.”
Survival on the battlefield is directly correlated with intelligence.
Airborne!
This pick seems so much smarter than Flynn. I don’t think Flynn was ready for prime time.
Flynn was almost a patronage pick. He was onboard the Trump Train from day one. His appointment was partly payback for his loyal support. Then it became clear that he just couldn’t handle the job.
McMaster, so far, seems to be a much more serious pick.
Any one hear how Mad-Dog is doing?
Flynn was a tactical nuke against the shadow gov, but they managed to run a wholly invented operation to take him out. That success has caused them to advance rooks Graham and McCain, and pawns like Waters forward to attack on the Russian front. The endgame is still unclear, the fog of war is still thick in the IC.
When he said Isis is not Muzzy got me off the bus. Just wondering if he was a lacky for Obama and never spoke out against him. Many of the good officers were terminated by Obama, ie Petraues, McCrystal, Maddis, Flynn etc.
“When he said Isis is not Muzzy”
He said what?
I’m pleased that we have a man of substance like General McMaster as National Security Advisor, as opposed to a grandstanding blowhard like John Bolton.
Score one from the swamp. A source that has asked to remain anonymous for fear of reprisals has informed me that he was present in August 2014 when McMaster was the featured speaker for the President’s Lecture Series at National Defense University in Washington, D.C. McMaster addressed an assembly of all the students in the colleges of the National Defense, including the National War College, the College of International Security Affairs (CISA), the Dwight D. Eisenhower School for National Security and Resource Strategy (formerly the Industrial College of the Armed Forces), and the others. There was, therefore, a large crowd, and multiple witnesses.
In his address, McMaster said flatly: “The Islamic State is not Islamic.”
Blogger cite McMaster’s speech at Virginia Military Institute where he says “a perverted interpretation of religion”, which is pretty close.
About four-minute mark:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcESByl9rpc
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.